CACI Technologies awarded $3.36M for Engineering Services, with a $786K task order for FY23
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $33,652,780 ($33.7M)
Contractor: CACI Technologies, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2015-05-04
End Date: 2018-05-03
Contract Duration: 1,095 days
Daily Burn Rate: $30.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF R23G TASK ORDER W15P7T-10-D-D413 KY05. FUNDS ARE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF $786,273.90.
Place of Performance
Location: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21005
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $33.7 million to CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF R23G TASK ORDER W15P7T-10-D-D413 KY05. FUNDS ARE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF $786,273.90. Key points: 1. Analysis indicates a fair value for money, with a cost-plus-fixed-fee structure. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 3. Risk indicators appear moderate, given the contract type and duration. 4. Performance context is tied to engineering services for the Department of the Army. 5. This contract fits within the broader IT and Engineering Services sector for defense spending.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $3.36 million for engineering services appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar contracts for specialized technical support within the Department of Defense. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure, while allowing for flexibility, can sometimes lead to higher overall costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not closely managed. The specific task order of $786,273.90 represents a significant portion of the total award, suggesting its importance to the overall project.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of a single award for this delivery order suggests that CACI Technologies, LLC was selected as the most advantageous offer based on the evaluation criteria. The competitive nature of the initial award process likely contributed to price discovery and ensured a degree of cost-effectiveness.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the assurance that the contract was awarded through a process designed to solicit the best value from a range of qualified providers, rather than through a non-competitive process.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from specialized engineering services. Services delivered likely support critical defense infrastructure or operational needs. The geographic impact is primarily within Maryland, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include employment for engineers and technical specialists at CACI Technologies.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in CPFF contracts if not rigorously monitored.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical engineering services could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive selection process.
- Contractor CACI Technologies, LLC has a track record in providing IT and engineering solutions to the government.
- The task order is well-defined within the broader contract scope.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader IT and professional services market supporting government operations. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. Benchmarking against similar contracts for defense engineering support suggests that the award amount is within typical ranges for the scope and duration of services provided.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that this was not a small business set-aside, and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless CACI Technologies voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, though detailed performance reports are often internal.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense IT Services
- Army Engineering Contracts
- Professional Services Contracts
- Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed properly.
- Limited competition information available for this specific task order beyond the initial award type.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, delivery-order, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, it-and-engineering, maryland, professional-services, caci-technologies-llc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $33.7 million to CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF R23G TASK ORDER W15P7T-10-D-D413 KY05. FUNDS ARE PROVIDED IN THE AMOUNT OF $786,273.90.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $33.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-05-04. End: 2018-05-03.
What is CACI Technologies, LLC's track record with the Department of Defense for similar engineering services?
CACI Technologies, LLC has a substantial track record with the Department of Defense, frequently securing contracts for IT, engineering, and professional services. Their history includes numerous awards across various branches, indicating a strong presence and established relationship. For engineering services specifically, CACI has been involved in projects ranging from systems engineering to technical support for complex defense systems. While this specific contract is a delivery order under a larger award, CACI's overall performance history with the DoD suggests a capacity to deliver on such requirements. A deeper dive into past performance evaluations for similar contracts would provide more granular insights into their reliability and quality of service.
How does the value of this contract compare to other engineering services contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?
The total award value of $3.36 million for engineering services, spread over a 3-year period (based on the delivery order dates), positions this contract as a mid-tier award within the Department of the Army's extensive portfolio. Many large-scale engineering projects for the Army can reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. However, for specialized engineering support or specific task orders, $3.36 million is a significant sum. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specific technical expertise or support functions would reveal whether the pricing is competitive. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure also means the final cost could vary, making direct comparisons challenging without detailed cost breakdowns.
What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for engineering services?
The primary risk associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for engineering services is the potential for cost overruns. While the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs, the fixed fee provides a set profit margin. If costs escalate significantly beyond initial estimates due to unforeseen technical challenges, scope creep, or inefficient management, the government bears the brunt of the increased expenses. This structure can disincentivize the contractor from aggressively controlling costs, as their fee remains constant regardless of cost efficiency. Effective oversight, detailed cost tracking, and robust change management processes are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value.
How effective are full and open competition processes in ensuring competitive pricing for specialized engineering services?
Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring competitive pricing for specialized engineering services. By allowing all responsible sources to submit offers, it maximizes the pool of potential bidders, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive proposals. This process encourages vendors to offer their best pricing and technical solutions to win the contract. However, the effectiveness can be influenced by the complexity of the service, the availability of qualified vendors, and the clarity of the solicitation requirements. In highly specialized niches, the number of capable bidders might be limited, potentially reducing the competitive pressure.
What is the historical spending trend for engineering services within the Department of the Army over the last five years?
Historical spending trends for engineering services within the Department of the Army have generally shown a consistent demand, often fluctuating with defense budgets and specific modernization or sustainment initiatives. While precise figures require access to comprehensive spending databases, the Army consistently allocates substantial resources to engineering support across various domains, including infrastructure, weapon systems, and IT. Spending in this category is often influenced by geopolitical factors, readiness requirements, and the lifecycle of major defense programs. Periods of increased global tension or new technology adoption typically correlate with higher spending on engineering and technical services to develop, maintain, or upgrade capabilities.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: CACI International Inc
Address: 14370 NEWBROOK DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $33,757,197
Exercised Options: $33,757,197
Current Obligation: $33,652,780
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W15P7T10DD413
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-05-04
Current End Date: 2018-05-03
Potential End Date: 2018-05-03 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-24
More Contracts from CACI Technologies, LLC
- Award of Task Order 0127 (S3R-043) PWS Titled, "engineering, Installation/Integration, Technology Insertion and Logistical Support to the Quick Reaction&battle Command Support Division" Funding IS Provided for Engineering, Logistical and Training Seta Support for Centcom, and C2D SPO Personnel on Slin 0008AA — $238.5M (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Award a NEW Five (5) Year Task Order Under the RS3 Contract for Modeling and Simulation, Analysis, Engineering, Networking, and Experimentation Support — $202.0M (Department of Defense)
- Award of Task Order 0092, W15p7t-06-D-E402 Title, "PEO C3T System Engineering Technical Assistance Support. Funding IS Provided for Seta Support on Slin 0001AA $12,000,000.00, on Slin 0001AB $5,500,000.00 and on Slin 0001AC $7,000,000.00 — $196.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200512!052533!1700!n00024!naval SEA Systems Command !N0017804D4026 !A!N! !Y!EH01 ! !20050901!20050930!057364507!094107844!045534641!n!caci Technologies, Inc !14151 Park Meadow Drive !chantilly !va!20151!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000000120139!n!n!000000000000!r408!program Management/Support Services !S1 !services !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!021!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! !1700!N00178!0001! ! — $184.5M (Department of Defense)
- Naval Forces Logistics Support — $178.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)