CACI Technologies awarded $65.6M for Army engineering and technical support, with a significant portion for reprogramming analysis
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $65,619,186 ($65.6M)
Contractor: CACI Technologies, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2015-01-29
End Date: 2019-07-28
Contract Duration: 1,641 days
Daily Burn Rate: $40.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: IGF::CL,CT::IGF ARMY REPROGRAMMING ANALYSIS TEAM - PROGRAM OFFICE ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $65.6 million to CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC for work described as: IGF::CL,CT::IGF ARMY REPROGRAMMING ANALYSIS TEAM - PROGRAM OFFICE ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value of $65.6 million over its period of performance. 2. Primarily focused on engineering and technical support for the Army, including reprogramming analysis. 3. Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. Contract duration of over 3 years, suggesting a need for sustained support. 5. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 6. The base award value is $39.9 million, with potential for growth through subsequent orders.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total value of $65.6 million over approximately 3.5 years averages to about $18.7 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar IT engineering and technical support contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the CPFF contract type introduces inherent risk for cost control. The base award of $39.9 million suggests a significant portion of the work was defined upfront, but the potential for growth to $65.6 million indicates flexibility and potential for scope expansion.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. With 3 bidders identified, this indicates a moderate level of competition. While not a large number, it suggests that the government sought multiple proposals and likely received competitive pricing. The specific details of the evaluation criteria and the winning proposal's strengths are not provided, but the competitive nature is a positive sign for price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best pricing and technical solutions, leading to potentially lower costs and better service quality.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army, receiving essential engineering and technical support. Services delivered include program office engineering and technical support, with a specific emphasis on reprogramming analysis. The geographic impact is likely concentrated within the Army's operational and administrative centers, primarily in Virginia where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include the employment of skilled engineers and technical specialists by CACI Technologies, LLC.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can incentivize contractors to increase costs to maximize profit, requiring robust oversight.
- The significant increase from the base award ($39.9M) to the total award ($65.6M) suggests potential for scope creep or unmanaged cost growth.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true value and effectiveness of the services provided.
- The contract's duration of over three years necessitates continuous monitoring to ensure ongoing relevance and efficiency.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process that should drive better value.
- The contractor, CACI Technologies, LLC, is a well-established entity in the government contracting space, suggesting experience and capability.
- The contract supports critical Army functions, including reprogramming analysis, which is vital for resource management and operational planning.
- The base award provides a defined scope, offering a degree of predictability for initial budgeting and resource allocation.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) and professional services sector, specifically custom computer programming services and engineering support. The market for such services is substantial, with numerous government contractors vying for these types of awards. The Department of Defense is a major client in this sector, frequently outsourcing complex technical and analytical functions. Benchmarking against similar contracts would require detailed analysis of service scope, duration, and contractor performance, but the $65.6 million value positions it as a significant award.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). CACI Technologies, LLC is a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific contract appears limited, though large prime contractors often utilize small business subcontractors for specialized tasks.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. As a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, rigorous financial oversight is crucial to monitor costs and ensure the fixed fee remains appropriate. Transparency is facilitated by the contract being awarded through full and open competition, with details likely available through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Army IT Support Services
- Defense Reprogramming Analysis
- Engineering and Technical Services Contracts
- Custom Computer Programming Services
- Department of Defense IT Procurement
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type requires careful monitoring to control costs.
- Significant potential for growth from base award to total award warrants scrutiny of scope and cost management.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes objective value assessment difficult.
- Contract duration necessitates ongoing oversight to ensure continued relevance and efficiency.
Tags
it, defense, department-of-the-army, engineering-services, technical-support, custom-computer-programming, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, virginia, large-business
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $65.6 million to CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. IGF::CL,CT::IGF ARMY REPROGRAMMING ANALYSIS TEAM - PROGRAM OFFICE ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $65.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-01-29. End: 2019-07-28.
What is the specific nature of the 'reprogramming analysis' and its importance to the Army?
Reprogramming analysis within the Department of Defense refers to the process of reviewing and justifying requests to shift funds between different budget accounts. This is a critical function because Congress appropriates funds for specific purposes, and any deviation requires formal approval through the reprogramming process. The Army, like other branches, must adhere to these budgetary controls. Analysis in this context likely involves evaluating the necessity of the proposed fund shifts, ensuring they align with strategic objectives, assessing potential impacts on other programs, and preparing the documentation required for congressional notification and approval. Effective reprogramming analysis ensures that funds are used efficiently and in accordance with legal and policy requirements, preventing waste and maintaining fiscal accountability.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract structure compare to other contract types for similar services?
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) is a type of cost-reimbursement contract where the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred, plus a fixed fee representing profit. This structure is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined or when there is a high degree of uncertainty. Compared to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contracts, CPFF shifts more cost risk to the government, as the final price is not known upfront. However, it can be advantageous for complex, R&D-intensive, or evolving requirements where FFP might stifle innovation or lead to inadequate proposals. Other cost-reimbursement types include Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), which adds performance incentives, and Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), which includes subjective award criteria. For IT engineering and technical support, FFP is often preferred for well-defined tasks, while CPFF or CPIF might be used for more developmental or integrated support roles.
What is CACI Technologies, LLC's track record with similar Army contracts?
CACI Technologies, LLC, is a major government contractor with extensive experience supporting the Department of Defense, including the Army. They have a history of performing IT, engineering, and technical support services across various Army commands and programs. While specific details on past performance for identical 'reprogramming analysis' tasks are not provided in this data snippet, CACI's broad portfolio suggests they possess the necessary infrastructure and expertise. A deeper dive into their contract history would reveal past performance ratings, any significant issues or accolades, and the scale of previous similar engagements. Generally, CACI is recognized for its capabilities in areas like C4ISR, cybersecurity, enterprise IT, and program management support, which are relevant to this contract's domain.
What are the potential risks associated with the $25.7 million difference between the base and total award values?
The difference of $25.7 million (from $39.9M base to $65.6M total) represents a potential increase of over 64% from the initial award amount. This significant variance could indicate several risks. Firstly, it might suggest that the initial scope defined in the base award was incomplete or underestimated, leading to the need for substantial modifications or additions. Secondly, under a CPFF structure, this growth could translate directly into higher costs for the government if not meticulously managed and justified. It raises questions about the initial cost estimation accuracy and the effectiveness of program management in controlling scope and expenditures. Without further details on how this increase was utilized (e.g., additional task orders, option periods exercised), it's difficult to definitively assess the risk, but it warrants close scrutiny of contract modifications and performance.
How does this contract's spending compare to overall Army IT or engineering support budgets?
The $65.6 million awarded to CACI Technologies, LLC for engineering and technical support is a notable sum for a single contract. However, when compared to the overall IT and engineering support budgets of the Department of the Army, it represents a relatively small fraction. The Army's annual budget runs into the tens of billions of dollars, with significant allocations for IT modernization, cybersecurity, research and development, and operational support. This specific contract likely addresses a specialized need within a larger program or functional area. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to identify the specific Army program this contract supports and compare its value against the total budget allocated to that program or the broader category of engineering and technical services within the Army's overall financial structure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: CACI International Inc
Address: 14370 NEWBROOK DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $84,992,067
Exercised Options: $65,619,186
Current Obligation: $65,619,186
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 6
Total Subaward Amount: $1,815,313
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W15P7T12DE010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-01-29
Current End Date: 2019-07-28
Potential End Date: 2019-07-28 12:07:00
Last Modified: 2023-10-26
More Contracts from CACI Technologies, LLC
- Award of Task Order 0127 (S3R-043) PWS Titled, "engineering, Installation/Integration, Technology Insertion and Logistical Support to the Quick Reaction&battle Command Support Division" Funding IS Provided for Engineering, Logistical and Training Seta Support for Centcom, and C2D SPO Personnel on Slin 0008AA — $238.5M (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Award a NEW Five (5) Year Task Order Under the RS3 Contract for Modeling and Simulation, Analysis, Engineering, Networking, and Experimentation Support — $202.0M (Department of Defense)
- Award of Task Order 0092, W15p7t-06-D-E402 Title, "PEO C3T System Engineering Technical Assistance Support. Funding IS Provided for Seta Support on Slin 0001AA $12,000,000.00, on Slin 0001AB $5,500,000.00 and on Slin 0001AC $7,000,000.00 — $196.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200512!052533!1700!n00024!naval SEA Systems Command !N0017804D4026 !A!N! !Y!EH01 ! !20050901!20050930!057364507!094107844!045534641!n!caci Technologies, Inc !14151 Park Meadow Drive !chantilly !va!20151!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000000120139!n!n!000000000000!r408!program Management/Support Services !S1 !services !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!021!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! !1700!N00178!0001! ! — $184.5M (Department of Defense)
- Naval Forces Logistics Support — $178.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)