Interior Department's $14.2M Facilities Management Contract Awarded to TESSADA & ASSOCIATES, INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,205,330 ($14.2M)

Contractor: Tessada & Associates, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2008-09-26

End Date: 2012-03-25

Contract Duration: 1,276 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Other

Official Description: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20372

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $14.2 million to TESSADA & ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the contract duration and scope. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a competitive delivery order, suggesting potential for price discovery. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a long performance period requiring ongoing oversight. 4. Performance context shows a multi-year contract for essential facilities management. 5. Sector positioning places this within the broader professional services and facilities management industry.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $14.2 million over approximately 3.5 years (1276 days) for facilities management services suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts for federal agencies would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the duration implies a need for consistent service delivery, and the total value is not exceptionally high for such a comprehensive scope.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely competed for this specific task order under a broader contract vehicle. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a reasonable level of competition, which is generally positive for price negotiation and service quality. The specific details of the competition, such as the number of proposals received and the evaluation criteria, are not fully detailed here.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a more efficient marketplace, potentially leading to lower prices and better service terms compared to sole-source procurements.

Public Impact

Benefits the Department of the Interior by ensuring the upkeep and operational efficiency of its facilities. Delivers essential facilities management services, including maintenance, repair, and potentially other operational support. Geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia, where the facilities are located. Workforce implications may include direct employment by the contractor and potential impacts on government facility staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (over 3 years) increases the risk of cost overruns or performance degradation if not actively managed.
Potential for scope creep if the definition of 'facilities management' is not tightly controlled.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical facility operations requires robust performance monitoring.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting initial price and service considerations.
Contract is for a defined period, allowing for re-evaluation and potential re-competition.
The contractor, TESSADA & ASSOCIATES, INC., has secured a federal contract, indicating some level of established capability.

Sector Analysis

Facilities management is a significant sector within the broader professional services industry, encompassing a wide range of services from building maintenance and repair to operational support. Federal spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to maintain a vast portfolio of government-owned and leased properties. This contract fits within the typical procurement patterns for agency operational support services, often competed through various contract vehicles.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside criterion for this specific contract award. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-asides is minimal. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would be a secondary avenue for small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Interior's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's statement of work and performance standards. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, though detailed performance reviews are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Buildings Fund
Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Other Agency Facilities Support Services

Risk Flags

Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
Potential for performance degradation over time.
Scope definition critical to prevent overruns.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $14.2 million to TESSADA & ASSOCIATES, INC.. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TESSADA & ASSOCIATES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-09-26. End: 2012-03-25.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities management services by the Department of the Interior?

Analyzing historical spending for facilities management by the Department of the Interior would involve examining contract data over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in total expenditure, the number and value of contracts awarded, and the types of services procured. For instance, a review might show an increasing reliance on outsourced facilities management, shifts in spending towards specific service categories (e.g., energy efficiency upgrades, cybersecurity for facility systems), or changes in the average contract size and duration. Understanding these patterns helps contextualize the $14.2 million award, indicating whether it represents a typical investment, an increase, or a decrease in spending for these services. It also informs future budget planning and identifies potential areas for cost savings or efficiency improvements by comparing current spending against historical benchmarks.

How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract compare to industry benchmarks for facilities management?

Determining the per-unit cost requires breaking down the total contract value by the specific services rendered and their corresponding quantities (e.g., cost per square foot maintained, cost per HVAC unit serviced, cost per janitorial hour). Without this granular data, a direct per-unit cost comparison is challenging. However, if such data were available, it could be benchmarked against industry reports from organizations like IFMA (International Facility Management Association) or surveys from consulting firms specializing in facilities management. A comparison might reveal if the government is paying a premium, a competitive rate, or a below-market rate for these services. Factors like geographic location (District of Columbia often has higher labor costs), the complexity of the facilities, and the specific service level agreements would need to be considered in any such comparison to ensure fairness.

What is TESSADA & ASSOCIATES, INC.'s track record with federal facilities management contracts?

Assessing TESSADA & ASSOCIATES, INC.'s track record involves reviewing their past performance on similar federal contracts. This includes examining contract values, durations, agencies served, and any reported performance evaluations or past performance questionnaires (PPQs). A history of successful contract completions, positive performance reviews, and minimal disputes or contract terminations would indicate a reliable contractor. Conversely, a record of poor performance, contract disputes, or frequent changes in key personnel might raise concerns. For this specific $14.2 million contract, understanding their experience with facilities management of a similar scale and complexity for agencies like the Department of the Interior is crucial for evaluating the risk associated with their selection.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this facilities management contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a facilities management contract typically focus on service delivery, cost efficiency, and compliance. Examples include response times for maintenance requests, completion rates for scheduled preventive maintenance, energy consumption reduction targets, occupant satisfaction scores, and adherence to safety and environmental regulations. The specific KPIs would be detailed in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Objectives (SOO). Regular monitoring and reporting against these KPIs by the contracting officer's representative (COR) are essential for ensuring the contractor meets its obligations and provides value for taxpayer money. Failure to meet KPIs could trigger corrective actions or penalties.

How has the scope of facilities management services evolved within the federal government over the past decade?

The scope of federal facilities management services has evolved significantly over the past decade, driven by technological advancements, sustainability mandates, and changing workplace dynamics. Initially focused on basic maintenance and repair, the scope now often includes energy management and efficiency initiatives (e.g., LEED certifications, smart building technologies), cybersecurity for building systems (BMS, IoT devices), space utilization optimization, and enhanced occupant well-being services. There's also a greater emphasis on lifecycle asset management and predictive maintenance using data analytics. Federal agencies are increasingly looking for integrated facilities management solutions that encompass a broader range of services, aiming for greater efficiency, cost savings, and improved environmental performance, moving beyond simple reactive repairs to proactive, strategic management.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8001 FORBES PL STE 310, SPRINGFIELD, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,205,330

Exercised Options: $14,205,330

Current Obligation: $14,205,330

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS06F0169Z

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline