Analytic Strategies LLC awarded $24.5M for engineering services, with a 5-year duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,523,614 ($24.5M)

Contractor: Analytic Strategies LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2016-04-29

End Date: 2021-10-28

Contract Duration: 2,008 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF CORPORATE SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22209

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $24.5 million to ANALYTIC STRATEGIES LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF CORPORATE SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the 5-year performance period. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment. 3. Performance timeline indicates a moderate-term engagement. 4. Engineering services are critical for agency infrastructure and operations. 5. Contract awarded to a single entity, requiring monitoring for performance. 6. Virginia-based contractor suggests potential regional economic impact.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $24.5 million over approximately five years for engineering services appears to be within a reasonable range for the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering support contracts for federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, without specific details on the services rendered, a definitive comparison is challenging. The pricing structure, likely time and materials, necessitates careful oversight to ensure efficiency and prevent cost overruns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited and allowed to bid. The presence of four bidders (implied by 'no': 4) suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This competitive process is expected to drive more favorable pricing and service quality for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more cost-effective solution compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The Department of the Interior benefits from specialized engineering expertise. Services delivered likely support infrastructure projects, facility management, or technical consulting. Geographic impact is primarily centered in Virginia, where the contractor is based. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for engineers and technical staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in time and materials contracts if not closely managed.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical engineering services requires robust performance monitoring.
Ensuring fair and equitable distribution of work if subcontracts are utilized.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Contract duration of five years allows for continuity of essential services.
Contractor has a track record with the government, suggesting familiarity with federal processes.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330), a significant segment of the federal contracting market. This sector encompasses a wide range of professional services related to the design, development, and implementation of infrastructure and technology. Federal spending in engineering services is substantial, supporting everything from military base construction to environmental remediation and IT system development. This contract's value of $24.5 million over five years is moderate within the context of large federal engineering procurements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a result, large businesses or those capable of competing in a full and open environment were the primary participants. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which would be a key area for further investigation to understand the broader impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the Department of the Interior's contracting officers and program managers. The Inspector General's office may also conduct audits or investigations into contract performance and financial management. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed performance metrics and spending breakdowns would require specific reporting from the agency.

Related Government Programs

Department of the Interior - General Services
Engineering and Technical Services
Professional Services Contracts
Time and Materials Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing structure.
Need for robust oversight to manage scope creep and ensure efficient service delivery.
Contractor performance history requires verification for risk assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $24.5 million to ANALYTIC STRATEGIES LLC. IGF::CT::IGF CORPORATE SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ANALYTIC STRATEGIES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-04-29. End: 2021-10-28.

What specific engineering services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Engineering Services' under NAICS code 541330. However, the specific nature of these services is not detailed. Typically, engineering services for an agency like the Department of the Interior could encompass a broad range of activities, including but not limited to civil engineering for infrastructure projects, environmental engineering for compliance and remediation, mechanical or electrical engineering for facility upgrades, or specialized technical consulting related to the agency's mission. Further analysis would require access to the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) to understand the precise deliverables and technical requirements.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar engineering contracts within the Department of the Interior?

The awarded amount of $24.5 million over approximately five years for engineering services is a moderate-sized contract within the federal landscape. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare it against other engineering services contracts awarded by the Department of the Interior or similar agencies (e.g., Army Corps of Engineers, EPA) with comparable scopes of work and durations. Factors such as the complexity of the engineering tasks, the required expertise, and the geographic location can significantly influence pricing. Without access to a detailed database of comparable contracts and their specific service details, a precise comparison is difficult, but the value appears reasonable for a multi-year, full-and-open competition award.

What are the potential risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract of this magnitude?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like the one awarded here, carry inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. The government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used, plus a fixed fee or நிர்ணயிக்கப்பட்ட markup. The main risk is that without stringent oversight, costs can escalate beyond initial estimates due to inefficiencies, scope creep, or inflated labor rates. For a $24.5 million contract over five years, the potential for significant cost overruns is substantial. Mitigation strategies include detailed monitoring of labor hours, verification of material costs, clear definition and control of the scope of work, and regular performance reviews to ensure productivity.

What is the track record of Analytic Strategies LLC in performing federal engineering contracts?

The provided data indicates that Analytic Strategies LLC was awarded this contract. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving engineering services. This would involve reviewing past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), checking for any past performance issues, disputes, or contract terminations. A history of successful project completion, adherence to schedules and budgets, and positive client feedback would indicate a strong track record. Conversely, any significant negative performance indicators would raise concerns about their capability to execute this current contract effectively.

How has federal spending in engineering services evolved over the past five years, and where does this contract fit?

Federal spending on engineering services has generally remained robust, driven by ongoing infrastructure needs, modernization efforts, and national security requirements. Agencies across the government consistently procure engineering expertise for a wide array of projects. This contract, valued at $24.5 million over five years, represents a moderate investment within the broader federal engineering services portfolio. It aligns with the consistent demand for such services, reflecting the government's ongoing commitment to maintaining and improving its physical and technical assets. Trends in federal spending often reflect budgetary priorities, economic conditions, and specific agency mission requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: D16PS00145

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Culmen International, LLC

Address: 8280 GREENSBORO DR STE 700, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,523,614

Exercised Options: $24,523,614

Current Obligation: $24,523,614

Actual Outlays: $10,768,851

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADS104

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline