Parsons Government Services Inc. awarded $162.4M for Mission Command Training Support, with 7 bids received

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $162,427,614 ($162.4M)

Contractor: Parsons Government Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2015-03-27

End Date: 2018-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,283 days

Daily Burn Rate: $126.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF MISSION COMMAND TRAINING SUPPORT PROGRAM (MCTSP) TRAINING SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22033

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $162.4 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF MISSION COMMAND TRAINING SUPPORT PROGRAM (MCTSP) TRAINING SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in military training infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a healthy market for these specialized support services. 3. Performance period of over three years indicates a need for sustained support. 4. The contract falls within administrative and management consulting services, a broad category. 5. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 6. The award was a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $162.4 million over approximately 3.5 years suggests a substantial but potentially reasonable investment for comprehensive training support. Benchmarking against similar large-scale training and simulation contracts is necessary for a definitive value assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure indicates an expectation of predictable costs, which is a positive sign for value realization, assuming the contractor can deliver within these parameters.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, with seven bids received. This indicates a robust competitive environment, which typically leads to better pricing and service innovation. The presence of multiple bidders suggests that the market has sufficient capacity and interest to support this type of requirement, fostering price discovery and potentially driving down costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process like this generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring that the government secures services at a price reflecting market value, rather than a premium that might be associated with less competitive solicitations.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are military personnel who receive enhanced training to improve mission command capabilities. Services delivered likely include curriculum development, simulation support, and operational planning assistance. The geographic impact is likely focused on training facilities within the United States, potentially supporting various Army posts. Workforce implications include employment for consultants, trainers, and technical support staff within the contractor's organization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if training requirements evolve significantly beyond initial projections.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical training support could pose a risk if performance falters.
Ensuring consistent quality across all training modules and support functions requires diligent oversight.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a strong market offering and potential for competitive pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Award to a known entity like Parsons Government Services Inc. may indicate a track record of successful performance in similar areas.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on management consulting and training. The market for defense training and simulation services is substantial, driven by the continuous need for military readiness and technological advancement. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large training support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense and other federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions or subcontracting goals for this particular delivery order. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the prime contractor has a subcontracting plan in place that benefits small businesses, or if the nature of the services inherently limits small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the relevant Department of the Army or supporting agency. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting, though specific performance metrics may not be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) programs
Simulation and Training Technology
Military Consulting Services
Defense Readiness Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract duration exceeds typical delivery order lengths, requiring sustained oversight.
Scope of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' is broad, necessitating clear performance metrics.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical training support.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $162.4 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.. IGF::OT::IGF MISSION COMMAND TRAINING SUPPORT PROGRAM (MCTSP) TRAINING SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $162.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-03-27. End: 2018-09-30.

What is the historical spending trend for the Mission Command Training Support Program (MCTSP)?

The provided data reflects a single award of $162.4 million for the IGF::OT::IGF MISSION COMMAND TRAINING SUPPORT PROGRAM (MCTSP) TRAINING SERVICES to Parsons Government Services Inc. This specific award covers the period from March 27, 2015, to September 30, 2018. To understand the historical spending trend, one would need to examine prior contract awards for MCTSP, including any predecessor programs or contracts held by other entities. Analyzing the total obligated amounts and contract durations over several fiscal years would reveal patterns in investment and program evolution. Without access to historical contract databases or specific program budget documents, it is difficult to provide a comprehensive trend analysis beyond this single data point.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar training support contracts for military command and control systems?

The $162.4 million award for Mission Command Training Support is a significant sum, indicative of a comprehensive and long-term training requirement. To benchmark this value, one would compare it to other large-scale contracts for developing, implementing, and sustaining training solutions for complex military systems, particularly those related to command and control (C2) or mission planning. For instance, contracts supporting simulation and virtual training environments, or those involving extensive curriculum development and instructor support for advanced warfighting capabilities, could serve as comparators. The number of bidders (7) suggests a competitive market, which generally supports reasonable pricing. However, a direct comparison would require detailed analysis of the scope of work, duration, and specific deliverables of other similar contracts.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) typically associated with Mission Command Training Support contracts?

Key performance indicators for Mission Command Training Support contracts often revolve around the effectiveness and efficiency of the training delivered. Common KPIs include trainee satisfaction scores, measured through post-training surveys; proficiency improvements, assessed via pre- and post-training evaluations or simulations; and the successful completion rate of training modules. Additionally, metrics related to the availability and reliability of training systems and simulators, adherence to training schedules, and the contractor's responsiveness to evolving military requirements are crucial. For this specific contract, the firm-fixed-price nature implies that meeting defined service levels and performance standards is paramount for the contractor to achieve full payment and avoid penalties.

What is the track record of Parsons Government Services Inc. in delivering similar large-scale training and simulation services?

Parsons Government Services Inc. has a substantial history of providing a wide range of services to government agencies, including significant work in defense and intelligence sectors. While specific details on their track record for Mission Command Training Support require deeper investigation into past performance reviews and contract histories, their general presence in the government contracting space suggests experience with complex projects. They have been involved in areas such as engineering, cybersecurity, and program management, which often intersect with the requirements of large-scale training and simulation. Evaluating their past performance on similar contracts, including client feedback, on-time delivery rates, and adherence to budget, would be essential for a complete assessment.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the development of future military training technologies?

Contracts like this can significantly influence the development of future military training technologies by driving innovation and demand. The requirements for mission command training often necessitate advanced simulation, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and sophisticated data analytics for performance tracking. As contractors like Parsons Government Services Inc. work to meet these needs, they invest in and refine these technologies. The insights gained from implementing and supporting these systems can inform future research and development efforts, potentially leading to more immersive, adaptive, and cost-effective training solutions. Furthermore, the success or challenges encountered in this contract could shape acquisition strategies and technology roadmaps for subsequent training programs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Parsons Corporation

Address: 100 W WALNUT ST, PASADENA, CA, 91124

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $183,084,968

Exercised Options: $183,084,968

Current Obligation: $162,427,614

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 8

Total Subaward Amount: $1,711,302

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F0005R

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline