Interior's $21.8M DPAA Network Integration Contract Awarded to Alii Consulting & Sales LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,800,636 ($21.8M)
Contractor: NA Alii Consulting & Sales LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior
Start Date: 2015-04-30
End Date: 2020-02-26
Contract Duration: 1,763 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: DPAA NETWORK INTEGRATION AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT IGF::CT::IGF
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of the Interior obligated $21.8 million to NA ALII CONSULTING & SALES LLC for work described as: DPAA NETWORK INTEGRATION AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT IGF::CT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor, raising questions about competition. 2. Significant contract value for Computer Systems Design Services. 3. Long duration of 1763 days suggests a substantial, ongoing need. 4. No small business participation noted. 5. Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's value of $21.8M for Computer Systems Design Services is substantial. Without a clear benchmark or competitive pricing data, assessing its value is difficult. The lack of competition further complicates a fair value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a limited source selection. This likely impacted price discovery, as there was no competitive pressure to drive down costs.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition and potential for inflated pricing could lead to suboptimal use of taxpayer funds.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the absence of competitive bidding. The long-term nature of the contract could lock the government into potentially outdated technology or services. Lack of transparency in the procurement process hinders public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- No small business participation
- Potentially high cost due to limited competition
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty
- Long-term contract ensures continuity of services
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Computer Systems Design Services, a critical sector for government operations. The spending benchmark for this category can vary widely based on complexity and duration, but the lack of competition here is a concern.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded to any small businesses, representing a missed opportunity for small business engagement and economic development. This suggests a potential gap in outreach or a focus on larger, established vendors.
Oversight & Accountability
The limited competition and sole-source nature of this award warrant further oversight to ensure the government received fair value and that the justification for limited competition was sound.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- Department of the Interior Contracting
- Departmental Offices Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpricing
- No small business participation
- Long contract duration without clear performance benchmarks
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, department-of-the-interior, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of the Interior awarded $21.8 million to NA ALII CONSULTING & SALES LLC. DPAA NETWORK INTEGRATION AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT IGF::CT::IGF
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NA ALII CONSULTING & SALES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-04-30. End: 2020-02-26.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a limited, non-competitive basis?
The justification for limited competition is crucial for understanding why alternative vendors were not considered. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the government explored all viable options or if there were unique circumstances necessitating a sole-source award. This lack of transparency raises concerns about potential inefficiencies and the best use of public funds.
How does the per-unit cost of these services compare to similar government contracts awarded competitively?
Comparing the per-unit cost to competitively awarded contracts is essential for determining value for money. If this contract's pricing is significantly higher than market rates established through competition, it indicates potential overspending. Without this benchmark, the $21.8M expenditure lacks context and makes it challenging to identify cost savings opportunities.
What measures are in place to ensure the effectiveness and relevance of the DPAA network integration and operations support over the contract's duration?
Given the contract's long duration, ensuring the ongoing effectiveness and relevance of the services is paramount. Mechanisms for performance monitoring, technology refresh, and adaptation to evolving needs should be robust. Without clear oversight and performance metrics, the government risks paying for outdated or underperforming services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: D15PS00130
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3375 KOAPAKA ST SUITE F220-24, HONOLULU, HI, 96819
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Native Hawaiian Organization Owned Firm, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,990,667
Exercised Options: $21,990,667
Current Obligation: $21,800,636
Actual Outlays: $2,235,140
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-04-30
Current End Date: 2020-02-26
Potential End Date: 2020-02-26 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-02-09
Other Department of the Interior Contracts
- Department of Health and Human Services, Administration of Children and Families, Office of Refugee Resettlement's Legal Services for Unaccompanied Children — $832.4M (Acacia Center for Justice)
- Military Family Life Counseling Program Igf::ot::igf — $638.8M (MHN Government Services LLC)
- Military Family Life Counseling Program — $637.0M (Magellan Healthcare Inc)
- Grants Program Solutions and Information Technology Support Services — $446.3M (Guidehouse Digital LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Requirement for Grants Program Solutions and IT Support Services IS to Provide Efficient and Effective Grant, Financial, and Contract Management Services, IT Solutions, and Support to the Grantsolutions and ITS Partners — $403.1M (Guidehouse Inc.)