HUD Awards $14.3M Contract for Internet/Intranet Development and Content Maintenance

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,279,306 ($14.3M)

Contractor: Drayton, Drayton & Lamar, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2008-05-09

End Date: 2013-05-08

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: IT

Official Description: DEPSEC/ODOC: NEW CONTRACT TO PROVIDE DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT MAINTENANCE FOR THE DEPARTMENT'S INTERNET/INTRANET PROGRAM. BASE PERIOD ONE YEAR, FUNDING FOR 7 MONTHS

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22201

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $14.3 million to DRAYTON, DRAYTON & LAMAR, INC for work described as: DEPSEC/ODOC: NEW CONTRACT TO PROVIDE DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT MAINTENANCE FOR THE DEPARTMENT'S INTERNET/INTRANET PROGRAM. BASE PERIOD ONE YEAR, FUNDING FOR 7 MONTHS Key points: 1. Contract awarded to DRAYTON, DRAYTON & LAMAR, INC for custom computer programming services. 2. The contract has a base period of one year, with funding for 7 months. 3. This award falls under the 'OTHER' contract type category. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541511. 5. The contract duration is 1825 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $14,279,305.94. Without specific benchmarks for custom computer programming services of this nature, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing. Further analysis would require comparison to similar contracts for internet/intranet development and maintenance.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This suggests that while competition was intended, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the breadth of competition and impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The impact on taxpayers is unclear without knowing the extent of the source exclusion and whether it led to a suboptimal price compared to full and open competition.

Public Impact

Citizens rely on HUD's internet and intranet for information and services. Effective content maintenance ensures accurate and accessible public information. Development of these platforms can improve government efficiency and citizen engagement.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition due to source exclusion.
Funding for only 7 months of the 1-year base period.
Contract duration significantly exceeds initial funding period.

Positive Signals

Awarded for essential IT services.
Contract falls under a standard NAICS code for the industry.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically custom computer programming services. Spending in this area is substantial across government, with significant variation based on project scope and complexity. Benchmarks are typically derived from similar custom development and maintenance contracts.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or achieved through subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract type 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests some level of oversight in the procurement process, but the exclusion of sources warrants scrutiny to ensure fairness and best value. The phased funding also raises questions about long-term planning and oversight.

Related Government Programs

Custom Computer Programming Services
Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracting
Department of Housing and Urban Development Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition.
Funding duration mismatch with base period.
Lack of justification for source exclusion.
Potential for service disruption due to phased funding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $14.3 million to DRAYTON, DRAYTON & LAMAR, INC. DEPSEC/ODOC: NEW CONTRACT TO PROVIDE DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT MAINTENANCE FOR THE DEPARTMENT'S INTERNET/INTRANET PROGRAM. BASE PERIOD ONE YEAR, FUNDING FOR 7 MONTHS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DRAYTON, DRAYTON & LAMAR, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-05-09. End: 2013-05-08.

What was the justification for excluding specific sources in this 'limited' competition?

The justification for excluding specific sources in this 'limited' competition is not provided in the data. Typically, such exclusions require a documented rationale, such as specific technical capabilities, national security concerns, or prior performance issues. Understanding this rationale is crucial for assessing the fairness of the procurement process and whether it truly achieved the best value for the government.

How does the $14.3 million cost compare to similar custom computer programming contracts for government internet/intranet development and maintenance?

Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable government contracts for custom computer programming services, a precise cost comparison is challenging. Factors like the scope of work, complexity of features, user base size, and required security protocols significantly influence pricing. A detailed analysis would involve benchmarking against contracts with similar technical requirements and service levels.

What is the risk associated with funding only 7 months of a 1-year base period for this contract?

The primary risk associated with funding only 7 months of a 1-year base period is the potential for disruption in services if follow-on funding is delayed or denied. This can lead to project delays, loss of institutional knowledge, and increased costs for contract re-competition or transition. It also raises concerns about the agency's long-term budget planning and commitment to the program.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (3)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 616 PONDER PLACE DR STE 2, EVANS, GA, 30809

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,279,306

Exercised Options: $14,279,306

Current Obligation: $14,279,306

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS06F0411Z

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline