DHS Spends $24.9M on Field Furniture from U.S. Business Interiors, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,876,592 ($24.9M)
Contractor: U.S. Business Interiors, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2006-11-29
End Date: 2009-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,128 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FIELD FURNITURE
Place of Performance
Location: UPPER MARLBORO, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20774
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $24.9 million to U.S. BUSINESS INTERIORS, INC. for work described as: FIELD FURNITURE Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $24.9 million for field furniture. 2. Awarded to U.S. Business Interiors, Inc. under full and open competition. 3. Contract duration of 1128 days suggests a substantial furniture requirement. 4. NAICS code 337211 indicates a focus on wood office furniture manufacturing.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $24.9 million for field furniture over approximately three years appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale furniture procurements would be necessary to definitively assess value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely led to a more efficient use of funds compared to non-competitive methods.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness by providing necessary furniture for federal facilities. Supports the furniture manufacturing sector, specifically wood office furniture. Potential for long-term use of furniture impacting agency space utilization.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific per-unit cost data makes value assessment difficult.
- Contract duration could lead to obsolescence if furniture designs change rapidly.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Clear contract end date provides a defined period for the requirement.
Sector Analysis
The procurement falls under the manufacturing sector, specifically wood office furniture. Federal spending in this area is often driven by agency build-outs, renovations, and replacement cycles.
Small Business Impact
While awarded under full and open competition, there is no explicit indication of small business participation or subcontracting goals within the provided data. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration. Standard procurement oversight processes would apply, but specific details on monitoring and accountability are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing
- Department of Homeland Security Contracting
- Transportation Security Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown.
- Potential for furniture obsolescence due to contract length.
- No explicit small business participation noted.
- Limited insight into specific furniture types and quantities.
Tags
wood-office-furniture-manufacturing, department-of-homeland-security, md, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $24.9 million to U.S. BUSINESS INTERIORS, INC.. FIELD FURNITURE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is U.S. BUSINESS INTERIORS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-11-29. End: 2009-12-31.
What was the average per-unit cost for the field furniture procured under this contract?
The provided data does not include specific per-unit cost breakdowns. The total award of $24.9 million over 1128 days for field furniture makes it challenging to establish a precise per-unit cost without itemized details. Further investigation into contract line item numbers (CLINs) or delivery orders would be required to calculate this benchmark.
What are the potential risks associated with a long-duration furniture contract?
Long-duration furniture contracts carry risks such as furniture becoming outdated in design or functionality, potential for wear and tear exceeding expected lifespans, and missed opportunities to leverage newer, more cost-effective or ergonomic furniture solutions that emerge during the contract period. Price fluctuations for raw materials could also impact long-term cost-effectiveness if not properly managed.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure optimal value for taxpayers?
The full and open competition method is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best prices. While this process generally leads to better outcomes, the ultimate effectiveness in ensuring optimal value depends on the specific bids received, the evaluation criteria used, and the negotiation process. Without access to bid data, it's presumed to have been effective.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: FURNITURE
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 8800 LOTTSFORD ROAD, LARGO, MD, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,876,592
Exercised Options: $24,876,592
Current Obligation: $24,876,592
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HSTS0304DRES107
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-11-29
Current End Date: 2009-12-31
Potential End Date: 2009-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-04-19
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)