DHS Funds TTAC Adjudication Services Recompete with Initial $12.1M for HAZMAT, Anticipating 4-Year Contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,129,847 ($12.1M)

Contractor: Jupiter Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2007-02-22

End Date: 2008-12-01

Contract Duration: 648 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.7K/day

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: Other

Official Description: THIS PR PROVIDES INITIAL FUNDING FOR THE TTAC ADJUDICATION CENTER CONTRACT RECOMPETE. CONTRACT NUMBER: DETERMINED UPON AWARD. CURRENT CONTRACT (THIS PR WILL NOT FUND THIS): BPA-HSTS02-05-F-CPO919 (TASK ORDER HSTS02-05-F-CPO013) CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: TBD UPON AWARD. EXPECTED FOR BASE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR PLUS THREE OPTION YEARS COMPANY: TBD SERVICES PROVIDED: ADJUDICATION SERVICES FOR TTAC PROGRAMS AND PROGRAMS OUTSIDE TTAC WHO UTILIZE THE TTAC BACKGROUND RECORDS CHECK SERVICES (INCLUDING HAZMAT PROGRAM, TWIC, RT, ETC.). PERIOD THIS PR FUNDS: FEBRUARY 1, 2007 - APRIL 10, 2007. INITIAL FUNDING WILL COVER HAZMAT ADJUDICATIONS FROM FEBRUARY 1, 2007 THROUGH APPROXIMATELY APRIL 10, 2007; OTHER TTAC PROGRAMS WILL CONTRIBUTE FUNDING PRIOR TO THEIR PROGRAMS REQUIRING CONTRACT ADJUDICATIONS SUPPORT. THIS CONTRACT/TASK ORDER WILL BE INCREMENTALLY FUNDED ON A QUARTERLY BASIS. POC: RUSS ROBERTS, 7-1986

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22201

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $12.1 million to JUPITER CORPORATION for work described as: THIS PR PROVIDES INITIAL FUNDING FOR THE TTAC ADJUDICATION CENTER CONTRACT RECOMPETE. CONTRACT NUMBER: DETERMINED UPON AWARD. CURRENT CONTRACT (THIS PR WILL NOT FUND THIS): BPA-HSTS02-05-F-CPO919 (TASK ORDER HSTS02-05-F-CPO013) CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: TBD UPON AW… Key points: 1. Initial funding of $12.1M allocated for adjudication services, primarily for HAZMAT. 2. Contract recompete indicates potential for new vendor or renewed contract. 3. Services support multiple programs including HAZMAT, TWIC, and RT, highlighting broad utility. 4. The contract is for 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' (NAICS 541990).

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The provided data lacks sufficient detail to benchmark pricing against similar contracts. The initial funding amount is for a short period (Feb-Apr 2007), making a comprehensive value assessment difficult without knowing the full contract value and period of performance.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract type is listed as BPA (Blanket Purchase Agreement), but the specific competition method for this task order or the recompete is not detailed. The lack of clarity on competition makes it difficult to assess price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The initial funding of $12.1M for a short period suggests a larger contract value to come. Without transparency on competition and pricing, it's hard to determine the optimal use of taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Ensures continued adjudication services for critical transportation security programs. Supports background checks for programs like HAZMAT, TWIC, and RT, impacting public safety. The recompete process could lead to improved services or cost efficiencies for taxpayers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of transparency on competition method for recompete.
Limited data on full contract value and period of performance.
Unclear pricing benchmarks for adjudication services.

Positive Signals

Provides essential services for multiple transportation security programs.
The recompete process aims to ensure continued service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under professional, scientific, and technical services, specifically related to background check adjudications for transportation security. Benchmarking requires comparison with similar government contracts for vetting and adjudication services.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses are involved in this contract or if there are specific set-aside goals. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The provided data is limited and does not offer insights into specific oversight mechanisms or accountability measures for this contract. The recompete process itself is a form of oversight.

Related Government Programs

All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Department of Homeland Security Contracting
Transportation Security Administration Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of transparency regarding competition.
Insufficient data for value and cost analysis.
Unclear performance metrics.
Limited information on contract duration and total value.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $12.1 million to JUPITER CORPORATION. THIS PR PROVIDES INITIAL FUNDING FOR THE TTAC ADJUDICATION CENTER CONTRACT RECOMPETE. CONTRACT NUMBER: DETERMINED UPON AWARD. CURRENT CONTRACT (THIS PR WILL NOT FUND THIS): BPA-HSTS02-05-F-CPO919 (TASK ORDER HSTS02-05-F-CPO013) CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: TBD UPON AWARD. EXPECTED FOR BASE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR PLUS THREE OPTION YEARS COMPANY: TBD SERVICES PROVIDED: ADJUDICATION SERVICES FOR TTAC PROGRAMS AND PROGRAMS OUTSIDE TTAC WHO UTILIZE THE TTAC BACKGROUND RECORDS CHECK SERVICE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JUPITER CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-02-22. End: 2008-12-01.

What is the total estimated value of the full contract, including all option years, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks for similar adjudication services?

The provided data only specifies an initial funding amount of $12.1M for a limited period (Feb-Apr 2007). The total estimated value for the base period plus three option years is not disclosed. Without this information and comparable industry pricing data, it's impossible to assess the overall value for money or benchmark it effectively against similar government or private sector contracts.

What specific competition methods were employed for this contract recompete, and how did they ensure fair and reasonable pricing?

The data indicates this is a recompete but does not specify the competition method used (e.g., full and open, sole source, limited competition). The contract type is a BPA. Transparency regarding the solicitation process, evaluation criteria, and the number of bids received is crucial for assessing whether fair and reasonable pricing was achieved and if taxpayer funds were used efficiently.

How effective are the current adjudication services in meeting the needs of TTAC programs and other utilizing entities, and what metrics are used to measure this effectiveness?

The provided data focuses on funding and service description but lacks information on performance metrics, service level agreements, or user feedback. Effectiveness would typically be measured by timeliness, accuracy, and completeness of adjudications. Without these details, it's difficult to gauge the actual effectiveness of the services provided under this contract.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Contractor Details

Address: 2730 UNIVERSITY BLVD, WHEATON, MD, 08

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,539,886

Exercised Options: $12,460,768

Current Obligation: $12,129,847

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HSTS0205ACPO920

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline