DHS Awards $140M Security Contract to Chenega Infinity, LLC for Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $139,914,254 ($139.9M)

Contractor: Chenega Infinity, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2016-10-01

End Date: 2025-06-30

Contract Duration: 3,194 days

Daily Burn Rate: $43.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF ENTERPRISE SECURITY SERVICES, FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTERS, INCLUDING GLYNCO, GA; ARTESIA, NM, CHARLESTON, SC AND CHELTENHAM, MD

Place of Performance

Location: BRUNSWICK, GLYNN County, GEORGIA, 31524

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $139.9 million to CHENEGA INFINITY, LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF ENTERPRISE SECURITY SERVICES, FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTERS, INCLUDING GLYNCO, GA; ARTESIA, NM, CHARLESTON, SC AND CHELTENHAM, MD Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $139.9 million, covers security services for multiple federal law enforcement training facilities. 2. Chenega Infinity, LLC is the sole awardee under a full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 3. The contract duration is over 8 years, indicating a long-term need for these security services. 4. The primary service is Security Guards and Patrol Services, a critical function for government facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $139.9 million over 8 years suggests a significant investment in security. Benchmarking against similar large-scale security contracts would be necessary for a precise value assessment, but the duration and scope indicate a substantial, potentially competitive, pricing structure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a competitive process but with specific source exclusions. This method aims for competition while potentially narrowing the field, which could impact price discovery compared to unrestricted full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers are funding essential security services for federal law enforcement training. The competitive nature, even with exclusions, aims to secure reasonable pricing for these vital operations.

Public Impact

Ensures the safety and security of federal law enforcement personnel and facilities. Supports the operational readiness of critical training centers across the US. Provides employment opportunities within the security services sector. Contributes to the overall mission of the Department of Homeland Security.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
Long contract duration may require performance reviews to ensure continued value.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical security functions.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process.
Addresses a critical government need for security.
Long-term commitment provides stability for services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Security and Protection Services sector, specifically focusing on guard and patrol services. Spending in this sector is consistently high across federal agencies due to the need for facility and personnel protection. Benchmarks for similar contracts would typically consider the number of sites, personnel required, and the level of security.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct small business participation evident in this specific award, which could be a missed opportunity for subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. Oversight would involve monitoring contractor performance, adherence to security protocols, and financial accountability throughout the contract's lifespan.

Related Government Programs

Security Guards and Patrol Services
Department of Homeland Security Contracting
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition due to source exclusion.
Potential for vendor lock-in with a long-term contract.
Lack of small business participation.
Dependence on a single provider for critical security.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $139.9 million to CHENEGA INFINITY, LLC. IGF::CT::IGF ENTERPRISE SECURITY SERVICES, FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTERS, INCLUDING GLYNCO, GA; ARTESIA, NM, CHARLESTON, SC AND CHELTENHAM, MD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHENEGA INFINITY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Law Enforcement Training Center).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $139.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-10-01. End: 2025-06-30.

What specific factors led to the exclusion of certain sources in this 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award?

The exclusion of sources typically occurs due to specific requirements, past performance issues, or proprietary technology/capabilities that only a limited number of vendors possess. Understanding these exclusions is crucial to assessing the true breadth of competition and whether the government secured the best possible value by limiting the pool of potential offerors.

How does the 'firm fixed price' contract type mitigate cost overruns for these security services?

A firm fixed price (FFP) contract establishes a ceiling price that the contractor must not exceed. This shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, incentivizing them to manage expenses efficiently. For the government, it provides budget certainty, although it may lead to higher initial pricing to account for contractor risk.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of Chenega Infinity's security services?

Effective oversight would involve tracking KPIs such as response times to incidents, adherence to post orders, reduction in security breaches, personnel qualifications and training levels, and overall client satisfaction from the training centers. Regular performance reviews against these metrics ensure the contractor is meeting the required security standards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: HSFLGL-15-R-00023

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14295 PARK MEADOW DR STE 400, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $139,914,254

Exercised Options: $139,914,254

Current Obligation: $139,914,254

Actual Outlays: $50,363,625

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline