DHS awards $10.19M for Guard Services to MVM, INC. in California

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,187,416 ($10.2M)

Contractor: MVM, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2006-12-19

End Date: 2007-09-23

Contract Duration: 278 days

Daily Burn Rate: $36.6K/day

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: OTHER (NONE OF THE ABOVE)

Sector: Other

Official Description: GUARD SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90731

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $10.2 million to MVM, INC. for work described as: GUARD SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded for security guard services, a common government need. 2. MVM, INC. is the sole awardee, raising questions about competition. 3. The contract duration is short (278 days), suggesting a potential gap-filler or short-term need. 4. Spending on security services is a significant but often scrutinized area of government expenditure.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $10.19M for approximately 9 months of service appears high. Benchmarking against similar contracts for guard services is needed to assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This appears to be a sole-source award, which limits price discovery and competitive pressure. The justification for sole-source is not provided, but it could be due to urgency or specific capabilities.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can lead to higher costs for taxpayers if competition is artificially suppressed.

Public Impact

Ensures security at federal facilities, contributing to public safety. Potential for increased costs due to lack of competition impacts taxpayer funds. Supports employment in the private security sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Potentially high cost per unit
Short contract duration may indicate a reactive procurement

Positive Signals

Addresses a critical government function (security)
Awarded to a single entity, potentially simplifying management

Sector Analysis

Security services are a recurring government expense. Benchmarks vary widely based on location, scope, and security level required, but this award appears substantial for the duration.

Small Business Impact

The award does not indicate any specific provisions for small business participation. Sole-source contracts often bypass small business set-aside opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial for sole-source contracts to ensure fair pricing and performance. The Department of Homeland Security's contracting office would be responsible for monitoring this award.

Related Government Programs

Security Guards and Patrol Services
Department of Homeland Security Contracting
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Programs

Risk Flags

Sole-source award limits competition.
Potential for overpayment due to lack of competitive bidding.
Short contract duration may indicate a reactive procurement strategy.
Lack of transparency regarding justification for sole-source award.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $10.2 million to MVM, INC.. GUARD SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MVM, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-12-19. End: 2007-09-23.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding the procurement strategy. Without it, it's difficult to assess if the government explored all competitive options or if there were legitimate reasons, such as urgency or unique capabilities, that precluded full and open competition. This lack of transparency raises concerns about potential inefficiencies and higher costs for taxpayers.

How does the per-unit cost of these guard services compare to industry benchmarks?

A detailed cost analysis comparing the per-unit cost (e.g., hourly rate per guard) to industry benchmarks for similar security services in California is essential. Given the sole-source nature, it's imperative to verify that the pricing is reasonable and reflects fair market value. Without this comparison, it's challenging to determine if taxpayers are receiving good value for the $10.19 million expenditure.

What is the expected impact of this short-term contract on long-term security service provision?

The short duration (278 days) suggests this contract might be a bridge to a larger, more comprehensive security solution or a response to an immediate, unforeseen need. Understanding the long-term strategy is important. If it's a recurring need, the government should consider a more competitive and longer-term contract to potentially achieve better pricing and service stability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Contractor Details

Address: 1593 SPRING HILL RD STE 700, VIENNA, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,187,416

Exercised Options: $10,187,416

Current Obligation: $10,187,416

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HSACL2C0006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline