DHS's $23.6M facilities support contract with Brymak Universal LLC awarded under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,639,446 ($23.6M)

Contractor: Brymak Universal LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2014-08-15

End Date: 2019-11-13

Contract Duration: 1,916 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BUILDING OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: NORTHPORT, STEVENS County, WASHINGTON, 99157

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $23.6 million to BRYMAK UNIVERSAL LLC for work described as: BUILDING OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. The contract value of $23.6 million over approximately 5 years represents a significant investment in facilities support services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this suggests a competitive bidding process that should have yielded favorable pricing. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor, potentially leading to cost certainty for the government. 4. The duration of 1916 days (approx. 5.25 years) indicates a long-term need for these essential building operations and maintenance services. 5. The contractor, Brymak Universal LLC, has been awarded this contract, highlighting its role in providing critical support to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 categorizes this as Facilities Support Services, a broad but essential category for government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more specific service details and comparable contract data. However, a $23.6 million spend over five years for facilities support services for a major agency like DHS suggests a substantial operational requirement. The firm-fixed-price nature of the award implies that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value if the price was competitive. Further analysis would require comparing the per-unit costs of specific services (e.g., maintenance hours, square footage serviced) against industry benchmarks or similar government contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which is a specific type of full and open competition. This indicates that the solicitation was made available to all responsible sources, and any responsible source was permitted to submit a response. The fact that it was competed suggests that multiple bidders likely participated, leading to price discovery and potentially a more competitive price for the government. The number of bidders (7) is a good indicator of the level of competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces. The presence of multiple bidders suggests that the government received a range of offers, increasing the likelihood of securing services at a reasonable cost.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel and operations, who rely on well-maintained facilities to conduct their mission. Services delivered include building operations, maintenance, and repairs, ensuring the functionality and safety of critical infrastructure. The geographic impact is likely concentrated in the areas where CBP facilities are located, potentially across various regions within the United States. The contract supports the workforce employed by Brymak Universal LLC, contributing to jobs in the facilities management and maintenance sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if maintenance needs are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for essential building operations could pose a risk if performance falters.
Ensuring consistent quality of maintenance and repair services across all contracted facilities requires robust oversight.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contractor has a defined period to deliver services, allowing for focused performance.
The contract duration suggests a stable, long-term relationship for essential services.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, is a broad sector encompassing a wide range of activities necessary for the operation and upkeep of buildings and other real property. This sector is critical for government agencies, ensuring that their physical infrastructure is functional, safe, and efficient. The market size for government facilities management is substantial, with agencies constantly requiring services for maintenance, repair, janitorial, security, and other operational needs. This contract fits within the broader landscape of government contracting for essential support services, where consistent demand exists across various agencies and departments.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data does not indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award to Brymak Universal LLC, a single entity, suggests that the primary focus was on securing the necessary services through the most competitive means available at the time. Without explicit small business set-aside provisions or reported subcontracting goals, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract appears limited, though the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors at its discretion.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) contracting officer and their representatives. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. The Inspector General for the Department of Homeland Security would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service
Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Public Facility Management Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract duration is long, requiring sustained performance monitoring.
Firm-fixed-price contracts can sometimes lead to contractor pressure to cut corners if not properly overseen.
Dependence on a single contractor for essential services poses a risk if performance issues arise.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $23.6 million to BRYMAK UNIVERSAL LLC. BUILDING OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BRYMAK UNIVERSAL LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Customs and Border Protection).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-08-15. End: 2019-11-13.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by U.S. Customs and Border Protection?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is crucial for understanding the agency's commitment to maintaining its infrastructure and for contextualizing the $23.6 million awarded to Brymak Universal LLC. While specific historical data for CBP's facilities spending is not provided in the given data snippet, such contracts are typically recurring needs for large federal agencies. CBP, responsible for border security, operates numerous facilities including ports of entry, office buildings, and detention centers, all requiring ongoing maintenance and operational support. Annual spending on these services can fluctuate based on infrastructure age, new construction, and specific operational demands. A comprehensive review would involve examining CBP's budget allocations and contract awards over several fiscal years to identify trends, average contract values, and the prevalence of different contract types and award methods for facilities management.

How does the awarded amount compare to the typical value of similar facilities support contracts within the federal government?

The $23.6 million awarded to Brymak Universal LLC for facilities support services over approximately five years is a substantial sum, indicative of the scale of operations managed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). To benchmark this value, one would compare it against similar contracts awarded by other federal agencies for comparable services (e.g., building operations, maintenance, repairs) and scope. For instance, contracts for large federal buildings or complexes managed by agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) or the Department of Defense often fall within this range or exceed it, depending on the size and complexity of the facilities. The firm-fixed-price nature of this award suggests an effort to control costs, but the ultimate value-for-money assessment depends on the specific services rendered and the competitive landscape. Without detailed service breakdowns and direct comparisons, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a high or low value, but it aligns with significant federal infrastructure support requirements.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Brymak Universal LLC's performance under this contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a facilities support services contract like the one awarded to Brymak Universal LLC typically focus on the reliability, responsiveness, and quality of the services provided. While not detailed in the provided data, common KPIs would likely include response times for maintenance requests (e.g., emergency repairs, routine service calls), completion rates for scheduled preventive maintenance, adherence to safety standards, energy efficiency targets, and overall customer satisfaction surveys from facility users. For a firm-fixed-price contract, meeting these KPIs is critical for the contractor to achieve profitability and avoid penalties or contract modifications. CBP would establish specific metrics and thresholds within the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) to objectively measure Brymak Universal LLC's performance and ensure the government receives the expected level of service for its investment.

What is Brymak Universal LLC's track record with federal contracts, particularly in facilities management?

Brymak Universal LLC's track record with federal contracts is a critical factor in assessing the risk and potential success of this $23.6 million award. While the provided data indicates this specific contract was awarded, it does not detail the company's history. A thorough review would involve examining federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) to identify previous contracts awarded to Brymak Universal LLC. This would reveal the types of services they have provided, the agencies they have served, contract values, performance ratings (if available), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. A strong track record in facilities management, particularly with agencies similar in size and scope to CBP, would suggest a lower performance risk. Conversely, a limited or problematic history might raise concerns about their capacity to meet the demands of this significant contract.

What is the potential impact of this contract on small businesses in the facilities support sector?

The potential impact of this contract on small businesses in the facilities support sector depends heavily on whether Brymak Universal LLC engages in subcontracting. The contract data indicates it was not a small business set-aside and the prime contractor is not a small business. Therefore, there is no direct set-aside benefit for small businesses. However, large federal contracts often include subcontracting goals, requiring the prime contractor to award a certain percentage of the work to small businesses. If such goals are in place for this contract, it could create opportunities for small businesses specializing in specific maintenance, repair, or operational services. Without explicit subcontracting plans or data, the impact remains indirect, relying on Brymak Universal LLC's discretion in selecting subcontractors.

How does the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award type influence pricing and contractor selection?

The award type 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' is a specific method within the broader category of full and open competition. It implies that the solicitation was publicly advertised, allowing all responsible sources to submit offers. However, the 'exclusion of sources' part suggests that certain potential sources might have been excluded based on specific criteria outlined in the solicitation, perhaps related to capability, past performance, or specific requirements. This method aims to maximize competition while ensuring that only qualified and capable contractors are considered. For taxpayers, this approach generally leads to competitive pricing as multiple bidders vie for the contract. The selection process would likely involve evaluating both price and non-price factors, with the goal of selecting the offer that represents the best value to the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1560 CHESTER AVE, BRYANS ROAD, MD, 20616

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $53,218,972

Exercised Options: $45,751,424

Current Obligation: $23,639,446

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline