DoD's $36.4M TRUST TA Phase 1 contract with Raytheon Company awarded via full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $36,387,576 ($36.4M)
Contractor: Raytheon Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-10-25
End Date: 2012-03-30
Contract Duration: 1,618 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 29
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: TRUST TA PHASE 1
Place of Performance
Location: EL SEGUNDO, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90245
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $36.4 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: TRUST TA PHASE 1 Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Raytheon Company for R&D services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized. 3. Contract duration was 1618 days. 4. The contract type was Cost Plus Fixed Fee.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $36.4M over 1618 days suggests a moderate per-diem rate. Without specific deliverables or comparable R&D contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult, but it appears within a reasonable range for complex research and development.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery. This method allows multiple bidders to compete, theoretically driving down costs and ensuring the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were utilized through a competitive process, aiming for efficiency in research and development spending.
Public Impact
Supports advanced research and development initiatives within the Department of Defense. Potential for technological advancements that could enhance national security. Investment in a major defense contractor, potentially impacting the aerospace and defense sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can incentivize cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- Long contract duration may indicate complexity or potential for scope creep.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Contract supports critical R&D for the DoD.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector. Spending in this area is crucial for technological advancement but can be prone to cost overruns due to the inherent uncertainties of research.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific involvement or benefit for small businesses in this contract. Large prime contractors like Raytheon often manage complex R&D projects with limited subcontracting opportunities for smaller entities.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, suggesting standard oversight procedures are in place. However, the effectiveness of oversight for Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts depends heavily on detailed performance metrics and vigilant monitoring.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
- Long contract duration.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
- Potential for cost overruns.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, ca, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $36.4 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. TRUST TA PHASE 1
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $36.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-10-25. End: 2012-03-30.
What were the key performance indicators and milestones for TRUST TA Phase 1, and how were they measured to ensure value for money?
The specific performance indicators and milestones for TRUST TA Phase 1 are not detailed in the provided data. For a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, value is typically assessed against the achievement of defined research objectives and technical milestones. Effective oversight would involve rigorous tracking of progress against these benchmarks and ensuring that the fixed fee accurately reflects the complexity and risk undertaken by the contractor.
Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, what mechanisms were in place to mitigate the risk of cost overruns and ensure efficient use of taxpayer funds?
Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts inherently carry a risk of cost overruns. Mitigation typically involves stringent contract clauses, detailed cost accounting standards, and proactive oversight by the contracting agency. Mechanisms might include regular audits, review of contractor expenditures, and clear definitions of allowable costs. The fixed fee itself is intended to provide an incentive for the contractor to manage costs efficiently, as any savings beyond the fee are usually shared.
How does the technological outcome of TRUST TA Phase 1 align with the Department of Defense's long-term R&D strategy and its effectiveness in enhancing national security capabilities?
The provided data does not detail the specific technological outcomes of TRUST TA Phase 1 or its alignment with DoD's strategic goals. Assessing effectiveness requires evaluating the delivered technologies against their intended applications and their contribution to national security. A thorough analysis would involve reviewing technical reports, operational test results, and the subsequent adoption or impact of the developed technologies within the defense apparatus.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: BASIC RESEARCH
Offers Received: 29
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2000 EAST EL SEGUNDO BLVD., EL SEGUNDO, CA, 90245
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $36,673,217
Exercised Options: $36,673,217
Current Obligation: $36,387,576
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-10-25
Current End Date: 2012-03-30
Potential End Date: 2012-03-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-03-27
More Contracts from Raytheon Company
- Federal Contract — $5.7B (Department of Defense)
- TEN Fire Units for Qatar — $5.6B (Department of Defense)
- GPS Advanced Control Segment (OCX) Phase B Blocks 1 and 2 — $4.5B (Department of Defense)
- An/Spy-6(v) Hardware Production — $3.3B (Department of Defense)
- Predominant - Patriot UAE — $3.0B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)