DoD awards $83M for SBX Development to Raytheon Company, a sole-source contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $82,950,162 ($83.0M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-11-01

End Date: 2024-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,429 days

Daily Burn Rate: $58.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: US SBX DEVELOPMENT

Place of Performance

Location: WOBURN, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01801

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $83.0 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: US SBX DEVELOPMENT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, large business vendor. 2. Focus on advanced missile defense technology development. 3. Potential for cost overruns due to Cost Plus Award Fee structure. 4. Limited transparency on pricing due to sole-source nature.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure can incentivize performance but also carries a risk of higher costs if not managed tightly. Benchmarking is difficult without competitive data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, which limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers. The sole-source award suggests a lack of available alternatives or a strategic decision to use a specific vendor.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition raises concerns about whether the government achieved the best possible price for this critical defense system.

Public Impact

Enhances national security through advanced missile defense capabilities. Supports high-tech jobs within the defense sector. Potential for technological advancements in radar and sensor systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition.
  • Cost Plus Award Fee structure can increase costs.
  • Lack of transparency in pricing.
  • No small business participation noted.

Positive Signals

  • Addresses critical national security needs.
  • Awarded to a known defense contractor with relevant expertise.
  • Potential for significant technological advancement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the defense sector, specifically focusing on advanced radar and sensor systems for missile defense. Spending in this area is critical for national security, but often involves high costs and complex technologies.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication of small business participation in this contract. The award to a large prime contractor suggests that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may be limited or not explicitly tracked in this data.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure cost control and performance. The Missile Defense Agency should actively monitor expenditures and contractor performance against award fee criteria.

Related Government Programs

  • Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Missile Defense Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award.
  • Cost Plus Award Fee contract type.
  • Lack of small business participation.
  • High dollar value contract.
  • Critical defense technology.

Tags

search-detection-navigation-guidance-aer, department-of-defense, ma, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $83.0 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. US SBX DEVELOPMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $83.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-11-01. End: 2024-09-30.

What is the justification for the sole-source award, and were alternative solutions considered?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, critical national security needs, or a lack of viable alternatives. Without further documentation, it's difficult to assess if alternatives were thoroughly explored or if the chosen vendor's capabilities are truly unique and indispensable for the SBX Development program.

How will the Cost Plus Award Fee structure be managed to prevent cost overruns and ensure value for taxpayer money?

Effective management of a CPAF contract requires clear, measurable performance metrics and rigorous oversight. The agency must establish objective criteria for award fees, regularly assess contractor performance against these metrics, and ensure that fee amounts are directly tied to achieved outcomes and cost efficiencies.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will their achievement be measured?

Key performance indicators for a contract like SBX Development would likely include technical milestones, system performance metrics (e.g., detection range, accuracy), integration timelines, and adherence to budget constraints. The agency needs robust testing and validation processes to objectively measure the contractor's progress and success against these defined KPIs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingNavigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments ManufacturingSearch, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: HQ014717R0012

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Rockwell Collins Australia PTY Limited

Address: 225 PRESIDENTIAL WAY, WOBURN, MA, 01801

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $83,845,515

Exercised Options: $83,845,515

Current Obligation: $82,950,162

Actual Outlays: $56,254,777

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HQ014718D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-11-01

Current End Date: 2024-09-30

Potential End Date: 2024-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-24

More Contracts from Raytheon Company

View all Raytheon Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending