DoD's $156M AN/TPY-2 O&S Contract Awarded to Raytheon Company

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $155,878,484 ($155.9M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-11-01

End Date: 2023-07-30

Contract Duration: 1,001 days

Daily Burn Rate: $155.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FY 21 AN/TPY-2 O&S

Place of Performance

Location: WOBURN, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01801

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $155.9 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: FY 21 AN/TPY-2 O&S Key points: 1. High contract value suggests significant operational needs for the AN/TPY-2 system. 2. Sole-source award to Raytheon Company, the likely original equipment manufacturer. 3. Risk of limited competition and potential for higher costs due to sole-source nature. 4. Spending falls within the 'Other Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance' sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure can incentivize cost savings but also carries inherent risk if not managed tightly. Benchmarking against similar complex electronic system maintenance contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to Raytheon Company. This limits price discovery and potentially increases costs for taxpayers as competition is absent.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this sole-source award may lead to higher expenditures than a competitively bid contract, impacting taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operational readiness of critical missile defense radar systems. Supports advanced threat detection capabilities for national security. Potential for cost overruns due to sole-source nature and CPIF contract type.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type
  • Lack of transparency in pricing

Positive Signals

  • Maintains critical defense capability
  • Long-term contract duration

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance' sector, which is crucial for supporting advanced defense systems. Spending benchmarks for specialized radar operations and maintenance are often high due to unique technical requirements and limited vendor pools.

Small Business Impact

The awardee is Raytheon Company, a large defense contractor. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific contract, which is common for sole-source awards of this nature.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Defense's Missile Defense Agency is responsible for this contract. Oversight is critical to ensure cost control and performance under the CPIF structure, especially given the sole-source nature.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Missile Defense Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition.
  • Potential for cost overruns with CPIF contract.
  • Lack of transparency in pricing.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for critical system maintenance.

Tags

other-electronic-and-precision-equipment, department-of-defense, ma, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $155.9 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. FY 21 AN/TPY-2 O&S

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $155.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-11-01. End: 2023-07-30.

What is the justification for the sole-source award, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?

The justification for a sole-source award typically stems from unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or the original equipment manufacturer's necessity for maintenance. The Missile Defense Agency would need to provide documentation demonstrating why competition was not feasible or advantageous for the AN/TPY-2 system's sustainment.

How are cost efficiencies being monitored and incentivized under the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure?

Under a CPIF contract, both the contractor and the government share in any cost savings or overruns relative to a target cost. Effective oversight involves rigorous review of incurred costs, performance metrics, and adherence to the incentive targets to ensure value for money and prevent excessive spending.

What is the long-term strategy for ensuring competitive sourcing for future AN/TPY-2 sustainment needs?

The long-term strategy should explore options for fostering competition, potentially through technology refresh programs, developing alternative support capabilities, or encouraging other qualified entities to gain expertise. This would mitigate reliance on a single source and improve future cost-effectiveness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Other Services (except Public Administration)Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and MaintenanceOther Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance

Product/Service Code: QUALITY CONTROL, TEST, INSPECTIONOTHER QUALITY, TEST, INSPECT SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: HQ014718R0001

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: RTX Corp

Address: 225 PRESIDENTIAL WAY, WOBURN, MA, 01801

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $158,123,297

Exercised Options: $158,123,297

Current Obligation: $155,878,484

Actual Outlays: $48,414,629

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 8

Total Subaward Amount: $963,910

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HQ014718D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-11-01

Current End Date: 2023-07-30

Potential End Date: 2023-07-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-18

More Contracts from Raytheon Company

View all Raytheon Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending