DoD Awards $4.58B for Next Generation Interceptor Development, Facing Potential Cost Overruns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,583,507,771 ($4.6B)

Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-03-25

End Date: 2031-03-31

Contract Duration: 3,658 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.3M/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEVELOPMENTAL TESTING OF THE NEXT GENERATION INTERCEPTOR (NGI) ALL-UP-ROUND (AUR)

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35805

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $4.58 billion to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEVELOPMENTAL TESTING OF THE NEXT GENERATION INTERCEPTOR (NGI) ALL-UP-ROUND (AUR) Key points: 1. Significant investment in critical missile defense technology. 2. Sole contractor, Lockheed Martin, raises competition concerns. 3. Long duration and cost-plus contract structure pose financial risks. 4. R&D spending in advanced defense systems is a key sector focus.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The $4.58 billion contract for NGI AUR is substantial. Given the 'Cost Plus Incentive Fee' structure and long development timeline, there's a high risk of cost growth beyond initial estimates. Benchmarking is difficult due to the unique nature of next-generation weapon systems.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

While initially awarded under full and open competition, the current phase appears to be with a single entity, Lockheed Martin. This limits future competitive pressure on pricing and innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are committed to a high-priority, but potentially costly, long-term defense program. Cost overruns could significantly increase the final price tag.

Public Impact

Enhances national security by developing a crucial missile defense capability. Supports high-tech jobs in the aerospace and defense sector. Long-term commitment of taxpayer funds for a critical defense asset. Potential for technological advancements with broad defense applications.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 75 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost overrun risk due to CPIF contract type.
  • Limited competition in later development phases.
  • Long project duration increases uncertainty.
  • Lack of small business participation noted.

Positive Signals

  • Addresses a critical national security need.
  • Utilizes advanced R&D capabilities.
  • Significant investment in defense modernization.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, specifically for advanced defense systems. Spending in this area is driven by national security priorities and technological advancement, often involving large, complex, and long-term projects with high R&D costs.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates no explicit small business participation. Large, complex defense development programs often subcontract to larger primes, potentially limiting direct opportunities for small businesses unless specifically mandated or pursued.

Oversight & Accountability

The Missile Defense Agency is responsible for this program. Oversight will be critical to manage costs, schedule, and performance throughout the extensive development and testing phases, especially given the CPIF contract structure.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Missile Defense Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost Overruns
  • Schedule Delays
  • Technical Performance Risk
  • Sole-Source Dependence
  • Limited Small Business Engagement

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, al, definitive-contract, billion-dollar

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $4.58 billion to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEVELOPMENTAL TESTING OF THE NEXT GENERATION INTERCEPTOR (NGI) ALL-UP-ROUND (AUR)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Missile Defense Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.58 billion.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-03-25. End: 2031-03-31.

What is the projected total lifecycle cost of the NGI program, and how does it compare to previous interceptor programs?

The current contract value is $4.58 billion for design, development, and testing through 2031. However, the total lifecycle cost is not provided and is likely to be significantly higher, encompassing production, deployment, and sustainment. Benchmarking against prior programs is challenging due to the 'next generation' nature and evolving threat landscape, but historical trends suggest potential for substantial cost growth in such complex weapon systems.

What are the specific performance metrics tied to the incentive fee, and what are the potential penalties if these are not met?

The provided data specifies a 'Cost Plus Incentive Fee' (CPIF) contract but does not detail the specific performance metrics or incentive fee structure. These metrics typically relate to technical performance, schedule adherence, and cost control. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the effectiveness of the incentives in driving desired outcomes or the potential financial impact of underperformance.

How will the MDA ensure continued competition or cost control throughout the NGI's lifecycle, given the current sole-source nature of this phase?

Ensuring future competition or cost control will require strategic planning by the MDA. Options include structuring future contract phases to allow for competitive bidding, implementing robust cost-tracking and negotiation processes, and potentially exploring alternative technologies or approaches. Proactive oversight and clear performance expectations are crucial to mitigate risks associated with a sole-source development path.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: HQ085620R0001

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4800 BRADFORD DR NW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35805

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,356,695,146

Exercised Options: $5,356,695,146

Current Obligation: $4,583,507,771

Actual Outlays: $1,591,846,741

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2000

Total Subaward Amount: $2,403,956,613

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-03-25

Current End Date: 2031-03-31

Potential End Date: 2031-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-05

More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation

View all Lockheed Martin Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending