DoD's $38.2M IGF Initiative with Booz Allen Hamilton Faced Extended Duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $38,215,579 ($38.2M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-10-23

End Date: 2020-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,926 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.8K/day

Sector: IT

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF INFRASTRUCTURE REENGINEERING INITIATIVE

Place of Performance

Location: Indiana, 46249

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $38.2 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF INFRASTRUCTURE REENGINEERING INITIATIVE Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton for $38.2M. 2. Significant contract duration of 1926 days (over 5 years). 3. No specific small business participation noted. 4. Sector is Defense, specifically IT/Finance support.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $38.2M over 5 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific deliverables or benchmarks, assessing value is difficult. Pricing is likely based on labor hours and rates, common for consulting services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract type is a delivery order, implying it was likely part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. The competition method for the original IDIQ is unknown, impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for this initiative. The value and effectiveness of the services rendered will determine the ultimate taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Defense spending on IT and financial systems modernization. Potential impact on military financial operations and efficiency. Long-term contract duration may indicate ongoing needs or scope creep.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Extended contract duration
  • Lack of small business participation
  • Unclear competition method

Positive Signals

  • Awarded to a known contractor
  • Addresses a critical defense function

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically IT and financial systems support. Spending benchmarks for similar re-engineering initiatives can vary widely based on scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication of small business participation in this contract. This could represent a missed opportunity for small businesses to contribute to defense initiatives.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). The extended duration warrants scrutiny to ensure continued relevance and cost-effectiveness.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Finance and Accounting Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Extended contract duration
  • Lack of small business participation
  • Unclear competition method
  • Potential for outdated technology

Tags

department-of-defense, in, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $38.2 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. IGF::OT::IGF INFRASTRUCTURE REENGINEERING INITIATIVE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Finance and Accounting Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $38.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-10-23. End: 2020-01-31.

What specific outcomes or improvements were achieved by the IGF Infrastructure Reengineering Initiative?

The provided data does not detail the specific outcomes or improvements achieved by the IGF Infrastructure Reengineering Initiative. Further analysis would require access to performance reports, milestone achievements, and final project evaluations to determine if the $38.2M investment yielded tangible benefits for the Department of Defense's financial systems.

What were the risks associated with extending this contract for over five years?

Extending a contract for over five years carries risks such as potential cost overruns if not managed tightly, scope creep leading to increased expenses beyond initial estimates, and the risk of technology becoming outdated during the contract period. There's also a risk of reduced competition if the contract is repeatedly extended without re-competition.

How effective was the competition strategy for the original contract vehicle that this delivery order was placed against?

The effectiveness of the competition strategy cannot be determined from the provided data, as the original contract vehicle is not specified, nor is the method of competition. If it was a sole-source or limited competition vehicle, the price discovery and overall value for the taxpayer may have been suboptimal compared to a full and open competition.

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending