Booz Allen Hamilton awarded $23M contract for DoD environmental restoration support, highlighting administrative consulting needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,036,447 ($23.0M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-09-29

End Date: 2025-09-28

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUPPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.0 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: SUPPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM Key points: 1. Contract value of $23M over five years suggests a significant, long-term need for specialized environmental consulting. 2. Full and open competition indicates a robust bidding process, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. The contract's focus on administrative and general management consulting for environmental restoration points to complex program management requirements. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor, incentivizing efficient service delivery. 5. Awarded to a single contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, suggesting strong qualifications or a specific niche expertise. 6. The contract duration of 1825 days (5 years) aligns with the long-term nature of environmental restoration projects.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $4.6 million annually for administrative management and general management consulting services appears reasonable given the scope of supporting the Department of Defense's Environmental Restoration Program. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental consulting contracts for federal agencies suggests this pricing is within expected ranges. The fixed-price nature of the contract further supports value by incentivizing cost control by the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a competitive environment was sought. This approach is generally favored for ensuring fair pricing and access to a broad range of expertise.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve the quality of services received.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits through enhanced support for its environmental restoration program, crucial for managing legacy contamination and compliance. Services delivered include administrative and general management consulting, likely encompassing project planning, regulatory compliance assistance, and program oversight. The geographic impact is broad, as the DoD's environmental restoration efforts span numerous installations nationwide. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized environmental consultants and administrative support staff, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in the consulting sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if administrative tasks are not clearly defined.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical administrative support could pose a risk if performance falters.
Ensuring effective oversight of a large, multi-year contract requires dedicated resources.

Positive Signals

Award under full and open competition suggests a competitive process that likely yielded a qualified contractor.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Long contract duration allows for continuity of essential support services for the DoD's environmental program.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. The market for these services supporting federal environmental programs is substantial, driven by regulatory requirements and the need for specialized expertise. Comparable spending often involves large, multi-year contracts for program management, technical analysis, and compliance support for agencies with significant environmental footprints like the DoD.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large contract awarded to a major firm, Booz Allen Hamilton, it is unlikely to involve significant direct subcontracting opportunities for small businesses unless specified within the BPA call's terms. The primary impact on the small business ecosystem would be indirect, through the overall health of the consulting market.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would likely be managed by the Washington Headquarters Services (WHS) within the Department of Defense. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract structure, requiring the contractor to deliver services within agreed-upon terms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics and oversight activities may not be publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Environmental Programs
Environmental Consulting Services
Federal Administrative Support Contracts
Management and Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Contract duration exceeds typical short-term needs.
Sole awardee for a significant contract value.
Focus on administrative services may mask underlying technical needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.0 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. SUPPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-09-29. End: 2025-09-28.

What is the historical spending pattern for environmental restoration support services by the Department of Defense?

Historical spending on environmental restoration support by the Department of Defense is substantial, reflecting the vast scale of its operations and legacy environmental challenges. While specific figures for this exact contract type are not detailed here, the DoD consistently allocates significant resources towards environmental compliance, cleanup, and management. This includes funding for consulting services, remediation technologies, and program management. Over the past decade, federal agencies, including the DoD, have increasingly relied on specialized contractors to navigate complex environmental regulations and execute restoration projects efficiently. Spending trends often correlate with regulatory changes, budget appropriations, and the identification of new environmental liabilities across military installations.

How does the awarded amount compare to other administrative consulting contracts for similar federal agencies?

The awarded amount of $23 million over five years, averaging approximately $4.6 million annually, positions this contract as a significant but not exceptionally large award within the federal administrative consulting space. Many federal agencies, particularly those with large operational footprints like the EPA, Department of the Interior, or Department of Energy, award contracts in the multi-million dollar range for comprehensive environmental program support. Contracts for broad administrative and management consulting services can range from a few million to tens of millions annually, depending on the agency's specific needs, the complexity of the program, and the duration of the contract. This award appears to be in line with typical procurements for specialized, long-term support.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) typically used to evaluate contractors for environmental restoration support?

Key performance indicators for environmental restoration support contracts often focus on adherence to regulatory requirements, project timelines, budget management, and the quality of deliverables. For administrative and management consulting, KPIs might include the accuracy and timeliness of reports, the effectiveness of program planning and coordination, successful navigation of permitting processes, and stakeholder engagement. For Booz Allen Hamilton on this DoD contract, metrics could involve the efficiency of administrative processes, the clarity of guidance provided, and the successful integration of various restoration activities. Performance is typically assessed through regular reviews, client feedback, and milestone achievement reports.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with the Department of Defense and environmental consulting contracts?

Booz Allen Hamilton has a long-standing and extensive track record of providing a wide array of services to the Department of Defense, encompassing technology, strategy, and management consulting. They are a major federal contractor with significant experience supporting defense initiatives. Within the environmental domain, they have engaged in various projects related to environmental compliance, sustainability, and resource management for government agencies. Their history with the DoD suggests a deep understanding of military operations and requirements. While specific details of past environmental restoration support contracts are not provided here, their overall profile indicates a capacity to handle complex, large-scale government contracts.

What are the potential risks associated with this type of administrative consulting contract for environmental restoration?

Potential risks for this administrative consulting contract include scope creep, where the defined administrative tasks expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns or schedule delays. There's also a risk related to the contractor's ability to maintain consistent performance over the five-year period. Ensuring effective knowledge transfer and continuity of service, especially if key personnel change, is crucial. Furthermore, the complexity of DoD environmental regulations means that misinterpretations or inadequate administrative support could lead to compliance issues or project setbacks. Robust oversight is necessary to mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: HQ003415R0054

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,038,947

Exercised Options: $23,038,947

Current Obligation: $23,036,447

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $114,432

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HQ003415A0034

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline