DoD's $27.8M consulting contract for strategic human capital planning awarded to DP George & Company, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,862,650 ($27.9M)

Contractor: DP George & Company, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-08-15

End Date: 2022-02-14

Contract Duration: 2,009 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF STRATEGIC HUMAN CAPITAL PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20301

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $27.9 million to DP GEORGE & COMPANY, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF STRATEGIC HUMAN CAPITAL PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of approximately 5.5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to administrative and management consulting services. 5. The contract was awarded as a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery contract vehicle. 6. The contractor, DP George & Company, LLC, has secured this significant award, indicating a level of trust and capability. 7. The service area is Washington Headquarters Services, within the Department of Defense.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $27.8 million contract is challenging without specific deliverables and performance metrics. However, the duration of nearly six years suggests a substantial investment in consulting services. Comparing it to similar contracts for strategic human capital planning within the DoD or other large federal agencies would provide better context for assessing its value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure offers some cost control, but the overall value hinges on the effectiveness and impact of the consulting provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 5 bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this requirement. While full and open competition is generally preferred for maximizing price discovery and ensuring fair access to government contracts, the specific number of bidders (5) provides a limited view of the true competitive landscape. Further analysis would be needed to understand if this represented robust competition or if potential bidders were deterred.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more favorable pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions. The fact that five bids were received suggests that the opportunity was accessible to multiple firms, potentially driving down costs compared to a sole-source award.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Defense, which receives support for its strategic human capital planning. Services delivered include administrative management and general management consulting, aimed at improving workforce strategies. The geographic impact is centered in Washington D.C., where the Washington Headquarters Services are located. Workforce implications include potential improvements in DoD's human capital management, affecting its personnel and operational efficiency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true impact and value delivered by the consulting services.
The long contract duration could lead to vendor lock-in or reduced agility if needs change significantly over time.
Without detailed breakdowns of the consulting services, it's hard to ascertain if the $27.8M was optimally allocated across different strategic areas.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a fair and accessible bidding process.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract supports a critical function: strategic human capital planning within the Department of Defense.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services to address complex policy and operational challenges. The market for management consulting is large and diverse, with numerous firms capable of providing strategic advice. This contract represents a substantial investment in human capital strategy, a critical component for any large organization, especially a federal agency like the DoD.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus was on full and open competition. There is no explicit information on subcontracting requirements for small businesses within this award. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether DP George & Company, LLC, utilizes small businesses as subcontractors, which is not detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the Washington Headquarters Services contracting office within the Department of Defense. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

DoD Human Capital Management Programs
Federal Management Consulting Services
Strategic Planning Support Contracts
Administrative Management Services
General Management Consulting

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep given the long duration and consulting nature.
Difficulty in objectively measuring the impact and ROI of consulting services without defined KPIs.
Reliance on a single contractor for a significant period could limit flexibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $27.9 million to DP GEORGE & COMPANY, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF STRATEGIC HUMAN CAPITAL PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DP GEORGE & COMPANY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-08-15. End: 2022-02-14.

What specific strategic human capital planning initiatives did DP George & Company, LLC support under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific initiatives supported by DP George & Company, LLC. However, given the NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) and the contract's purpose ('STRATEGIC HUMAN CAPITAL PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES'), the services likely encompassed areas such as workforce analysis, talent management strategies, organizational design, succession planning, leadership development, and HR policy development. The contract's duration of nearly six years suggests a comprehensive and ongoing engagement rather than a single project. To understand the specific initiatives, one would need to review the contract's statement of work (SOW) or task orders issued under this award.

How does the $27.8 million contract value compare to similar human capital consulting contracts within the federal government?

Comparing the $27.8 million contract value requires context regarding the scope, duration, and specific services rendered. For strategic human capital planning, this amount over approximately 5.5 years (August 2016 to February 2022) averages around $4.8 million per year. This figure is substantial but not necessarily out of line for large-scale, long-term consulting engagements within major federal agencies like the Department of Defense. Benchmarking against similar contracts would involve identifying awards with comparable NAICS codes (e.g., 541611, 541612) and service descriptions (human capital, workforce strategy, organizational development) awarded to large federal agencies during a similar timeframe. Without access to a comprehensive database of such contracts and their specific details, a precise comparison is difficult, but the value suggests a significant and sustained effort.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. Typically, for consulting services, KPIs would be defined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or task orders. These might include metrics related to the successful development and implementation of strategic plans, improvements in workforce recruitment or retention rates, efficiency gains in HR processes, or the successful execution of leadership development programs. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it impossible to objectively assess the contractor's performance or the contract's overall effectiveness in achieving its intended outcomes.

What is the track record of DP George & Company, LLC in securing and performing on federal contracts, particularly in the consulting space?

DP George & Company, LLC has secured this $27.8 million contract with the Department of Defense, indicating a capacity to compete for and win significant federal awards. The contract's duration (August 2016 - February 2022) suggests a successful performance history, as agencies typically extend or re-award contracts to vendors who meet or exceed expectations. While this specific award is substantial, a comprehensive assessment of their track record would involve examining their portfolio of other federal contracts, including their value, duration, agency, and performance ratings (if available through sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS). Their specialization in administrative and management consulting, as indicated by NAICS code 541611, suggests experience in this domain.

Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with this contract, and how were they managed?

The provided data does not explicitly list risks or challenges associated with this contract. However, common risks in large, long-term consulting contracts include scope creep, potential for cost overruns (though mitigated by fixed-price), contractor performance issues, changes in government requirements, and integration challenges with existing systems or personnel. The management of these risks would typically involve robust contract oversight, clear communication channels, regular progress reviews, and adherence to the contract's terms and conditions. The firm-fixed-price nature helps manage financial risk for the government, while the full and open competition aims to ensure a capable contractor is selected.

What is the historical spending trend for strategic human capital planning support services within the Department of Defense?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award and does not offer historical spending trends for strategic human capital planning support services within the Department of Defense. To analyze such trends, one would need access to historical contract data over multiple fiscal years, identifying all contracts related to human capital strategy, workforce planning, and related consulting services across various DoD components. This would involve examining spending patterns, identifying key contractors, and understanding fluctuations in demand for these services over time. Such an analysis could reveal whether spending on these services has increased, decreased, or remained stable, and whether it is concentrated within specific offices or spread broadly.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2121 EISENHOWER AVE STE 100, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,862,650

Exercised Options: $27,862,650

Current Obligation: $27,862,650

Actual Outlays: $1,271,519

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F0033X

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline