Booz Allen Hamilton awarded $30.6M for engineering services, with a significant portion allocated to technical analysis

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,591,581 ($30.6M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2015-09-29

End Date: 2019-02-14

Contract Duration: 1,234 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF STUDIES&TECHNICAL ANALYSIS SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, ALEXANDRIA CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22350

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $30.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF STUDIES&TECHNICAL ANALYSIS SUPPORT Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair, with a substantial portion of the contract dedicated to specialized technical analysis. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open competition, suggesting a robust market for these services. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, given the nature of engineering and technical support services. 4. Performance context shows a multi-year contract supporting critical Department of Defense functions. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the broader engineering and professional services market for the federal government.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award of $30.6 million for engineering services, including technical analysis, is substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized engineering and analytical support is crucial for a definitive value assessment. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) contract type suggests that costs are reimbursed, plus a fixed fee for profit, which can sometimes lead to higher overall costs if not managed tightly. However, CPFF is often used for research and development or complex services where cost estimation is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of multiple bidders in such a competitive environment generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation implies a healthy competitive landscape.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it drives down prices through market forces and encourages a wider pool of contractors to offer their services, leading to potentially better value.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense is the primary beneficiary, receiving critical engineering and technical analysis support. Services delivered likely include complex engineering studies, technical assessments, and strategic analysis to support defense operations. The geographic impact is primarily centered around Washington Headquarters Services, indicating support for high-level defense decision-making. Workforce implications involve skilled engineers, analysts, and technical experts contributing to national security objectives.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts if not rigorously monitored.
Scope creep could increase the total contract value beyond initial projections without adequate change control.
Dependence on a single large contractor for critical technical analysis could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
Booz Allen Hamilton is a well-established contractor with significant experience in government services.
The contract duration and value indicate a significant and ongoing need for these specialized services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically engineering services. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large engineering support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense and other agencies for similar specialized analytical capabilities.

Small Business Impact

The contract details do not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions. Given the nature and scale of the services, it is likely that larger, established firms like Booz Allen Hamilton are the primary awardees. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, but are not explicitly detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of Defense. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be sensitive.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Engineering Services
Technical Analysis Support Contracts
Professional and Technical Services
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
Washington Headquarters Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee contract type requires diligent oversight to manage costs.
Potential for scope creep in complex engineering and analysis projects.
Dependence on contractor expertise for specialized technical analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $30.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. IGF::CL::IGF STUDIES&TECHNICAL ANALYSIS SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Washington Headquarters Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-09-29. End: 2019-02-14.

What is the historical spending pattern for IGF::CL::IGF STUDIES&TECHNICAL ANALYSIS SUPPORT with Booz Allen Hamilton?

Historical spending data for the specific contract identifier 'IGF::CL::IGF STUDIES&TECHNICAL ANALYSIS SUPPORT' awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton shows a total award value of $30,591,580.65. This single award covers the period from September 29, 2015, to February 14, 2019, with a duration of 1234 days. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), and it was awarded via full and open competition. The data indicates this was a significant, multi-year engagement for engineering and technical analysis services supporting the Department of Defense through Washington Headquarters Services. Without access to prior or subsequent contracts under the same or similar identifiers, it's difficult to establish a long-term trend, but this specific award represents a substantial investment over its performance period.

How does the pricing structure (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) compare to other engineering services contracts?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure is common for complex engineering and technical services where the scope of work may evolve or is difficult to define precisely at the outset. Compared to fixed-price contracts, CPFF offers flexibility but can potentially lead to higher costs for the government if not managed diligently, as the contractor is reimbursed for actual costs plus a predetermined profit. Other common structures include Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), which incentivizes performance, and Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), which provides cost certainty but requires a well-defined scope. For specialized technical analysis and engineering support, CPFF is often deemed appropriate due to the inherent uncertainties in research, development, and complex problem-solving, allowing contractors to pursue innovative solutions without bearing all the financial risk.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) typically associated with engineering and technical analysis support contracts?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for engineering and technical analysis support contracts often focus on the quality, timeliness, and accuracy of deliverables. For this specific contract, KPIs might include adherence to technical specifications, the thoroughness and validity of analytical reports, the successful completion of engineering studies within defined parameters, and the responsiveness of the contractor to government requests. Timeliness in delivering reports and analyses, meeting project milestones, and maintaining effective communication channels are also critical. Furthermore, KPIs could assess the contractor's ability to provide innovative solutions or identify efficiencies. The effectiveness of the support in contributing to the Department of Defense's objectives would be an overarching measure of success.

What is the typical duration and value range for similar engineering services contracts at the Department of Defense?

The duration of this contract was approximately 3.4 years (1234 days), and the total award was $30.6 million. Similar engineering services contracts at the Department of Defense can vary widely in duration and value depending on the complexity, scope, and criticality of the services. Contracts for basic engineering support might be shorter and valued in the millions, while large-scale R&D, system design, or specialized technical analysis programs can extend for many years and reach hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. Contracts like this one, focused on specific technical analysis and engineering studies, often fall into the mid-to-high single-digit millions per year range, making the $30.6 million award over its term representative of a significant, multi-faceted engagement.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with the Department of Defense for engineering and technical services?

Booz Allen Hamilton has a long-standing and extensive track record of providing a wide array of services, including engineering and technical support, to the Department of Defense (DoD). They are a major federal contractor with deep experience across various defense agencies and military branches. Their portfolio includes complex systems engineering, cybersecurity, intelligence analysis, IT modernization, and strategic consulting. The DoD represents a significant portion of Booz Allen Hamilton's revenue. While specific performance metrics for every contract are not publicly detailed, their continued success in winning and performing on numerous large-scale DoD contracts suggests a generally positive track record and established expertise in meeting the department's demanding requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: HQ003415R0080

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,591,581

Exercised Options: $30,591,581

Current Obligation: $30,591,581

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 8

Total Subaward Amount: $385,745

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADU108

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline