NIH's $30.8M contract for clinical data management awarded to Peraton Inc. shows fair value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $30,851,823 ($30.9M)
Contractor: Peraton Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Start Date: 2016-07-15
End Date: 2020-01-14
Contract Duration: 1,278 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTION - CLINICAL DATA MANAGEMENT FOR THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE CENTER FOR CANCER RESEARCH.
Place of Performance
Location: BETHESDA, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20814
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Health and Human Services obligated $30.9 million to PERATON INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTION - CLINICAL DATA MANAGEMENT FOR THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE CENTER FOR CANCER RESEARCH. Key points: 1. The contract's value appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar IT services contracts. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration and delivery order structure present moderate performance risks. 4. This contract supports critical cancer research data management for the National Cancer Institute. 5. The IT services sector is characterized by high demand and evolving technological needs.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total value of approximately $30.8 million over its period of performance suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar IT services contracts for data management and clinical support indicates that the pricing is within an expected range. While specific cost breakdowns are not available, the overall value does not appear to be excessively high or low compared to industry standards for the services rendered.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but the use of full and open competition generally promotes price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. This approach is intended to ensure the government receives the best value by considering a wide range of potential contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at competitive market rates, thereby optimizing the use of public funds.
Public Impact
Researchers at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) benefit from efficient clinical data management. The contract supports the collection, organization, and analysis of critical data for cancer research. Geographic impact is primarily within the research facilities of the NCI, likely in Maryland. The contract supports IT professionals and potentially clinical research staff involved in data handling.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep given the nature of clinical data management and research evolution.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical data infrastructure could pose a risk if performance falters.
- Ensuring data security and privacy compliance throughout the contract lifecycle is paramount.
Positive Signals
- The use of full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
- The contract's duration implies a stable, long-term need for these services.
- The specific focus on clinical data management for cancer research aligns with a critical public health mission.
Sector Analysis
The IT services sector, particularly within healthcare and research, is a significant market. Contracts for clinical data management are essential for organizations like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to process and analyze vast amounts of research data. This contract fits within the broader category of health IT and data analytics services, a rapidly growing segment driven by the increasing volume and complexity of biomedical research.
Small Business Impact
Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not provided for this contract. As it was awarded under full and open competition, there is no explicit indication of a specific set-aside for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether small businesses participated as prime contractors or subcontractors, which is not detailed in the available data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), specifically the Center for Cancer Research. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance work statement and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though detailed operational oversight specifics are not publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- National Cancer Institute Research Support Contracts
- NIH IT Services and Support
- Clinical Data Management Services
- Health IT Infrastructure Contracts
Risk Flags
- Data Security and Privacy Risk
- Performance and Delivery Risk
- Contractor Dependency Risk
Tags
healthcare, it-services, data-management, national-institutes-of-health, department-of-health-and-human-services, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, delivery-order, computer-systems-design-services, maryland, research-and-development, cancer-research
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Health and Human Services awarded $30.9 million to PERATON INC.. IGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTION - CLINICAL DATA MANAGEMENT FOR THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE CENTER FOR CANCER RESEARCH.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PERATON INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (National Institutes of Health).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-07-15. End: 2020-01-14.
What is the contractor's track record with similar government contracts, particularly within the NIH or other health research agencies?
Peraton Inc. has a significant history of performing IT and mission support services for various government agencies, including defense, intelligence, and civilian sectors. While specific details on their performance for this particular National Cancer Institute contract are not elaborated upon in the provided data, their broader portfolio suggests experience in managing complex IT systems and data. A deeper dive into past performance evaluations and any reported issues on similar contracts would be necessary to fully assess their track record in health research data management.
How does the cost of this contract compare to other clinical data management contracts awarded by the NIH or similar research institutions?
The total contract value of approximately $30.8 million over its duration represents a moderate annual expenditure for clinical data management services. Without access to a detailed cost breakdown or specific performance metrics, a precise comparison is challenging. However, based on general industry benchmarks for IT services supporting research, this figure appears to be within a reasonable range. Factors such as the scope of services, complexity of data, and duration significantly influence pricing, making direct comparisons difficult without granular data.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Key risks include potential data breaches or security vulnerabilities given the sensitive nature of clinical data, performance issues leading to delays in research, and contractor dependency. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust security protocols, regular performance reviews, clear service level agreements (SLAs), and contingency planning. The contract's structure, including delivery orders, allows for adjustments, but effective oversight is crucial to manage these risks throughout the performance period.
How effective has this contract been in supporting the National Cancer Institute's research objectives?
The effectiveness of this contract is directly tied to its ability to facilitate the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) research goals. By providing reliable clinical data management, the contract should enable researchers to efficiently collect, store, analyze, and share data, thereby accelerating discoveries and treatment development. Quantifying effectiveness would require examining metrics related to data integrity, accessibility, timeliness of analysis, and ultimately, the impact on research outcomes and publications stemming from the NCI's Center for Cancer Research.
What are the historical spending patterns for clinical data management services at the NIH or NCI?
Historical spending on clinical data management at the NIH and NCI likely shows a consistent and growing trend, reflecting the increasing volume and complexity of biomedical research and the critical need for robust data infrastructure. Such spending is essential for supporting large-scale clinical trials, genomic research, and epidemiological studies. Analyzing past contracts for similar services would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the types of technologies and services procured, indicating a sustained investment in this area.
What is the specific nature of the 'Computer Systems Design Services' provided under this contract?
The 'Computer Systems Design Services' under this contract specifically pertain to the management of clinical data for the National Cancer Institute's Center for Cancer Research. This likely involves designing, implementing, and maintaining systems for data collection, storage, processing, security, and retrieval. It could encompass database development, software integration, ensuring data integrity and compliance with regulations (like HIPAA), and providing technical support to researchers utilizing these systems to advance cancer research.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: NIHJT2010001
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 12975 WORLDGATE STE 7322, HERNDON, VA, 20170
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $48,514,082
Exercised Options: $31,268,325
Current Obligation: $30,851,823
Actual Outlays: $180,107
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HHSN316201200025W
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-07-15
Current End Date: 2020-01-14
Potential End Date: 2021-07-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-04-25
More Contracts from Peraton Inc.
- 200107!000034!5700!GZ80 !smc/Pks !F0470101C0001 !A!N!*!Y! !20001103!20061031!052819732!052819732!001216845!n!itt Industries, Inc , Systems !4410 E Fountain Blvd !colorado Sprin !co!80916!16000!041!08!colorado Springs !EL Paso !colorado !+000016429445!n!n!000000000000!ac26!rdte/Missile and Space Systems-Mgmt Support !A2 !missile and Space Systems !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!B! !A !Y!R!2!003!B! !A!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $1.7B (Department of Defense)
- THE Exploration and Space Communications Projects Division (ESC) IS a National Resource Located AT Goddard Space Flight Center (gsfc) Which Enables Scientific Discovery and Space Exploration by Providing Innovative and Mission-Effective Space Communications and Navigation Solutions to a Large Community of Diverse Customers. ESC Manages Operational Geostationary Communications Relay Satellites and Ground Systems for the Space Communications and Navigation (scan) Program AT Nasa Headquarters. Today, Scan Network Systems Consist of the Space Network (SN), the Near Earth Network (NEN), and the Deep Space Network (DSN). the Day-To-Day Management of These Three Networks IS Currently NOT Fully Consistent. IT IS the Intention of the Government to Unify the SN and NEN Where Practicable Under This Contract Using Integrated, Common Management Practices and Network Solutions — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center's (gsfc) Goal for the Space Communications Networks Services Contract (scns) IS to Enable Mission Success for Every Customer Using Scns Services. KEY Objectives of the Scns Contract ARE to Decrease Cost and Maintain or Improve Operational Efficiency and Reliability, While Maintaining an Acceptable Level of Risk and Providing for Safe Operation of the Missions. the Contractor Shall Implement a Safety, Health, and Mission Assurance Program That Provides a Safe and Healthy Work Environment, Minimizes Program Risk, and Maximizes Nasa Mission Success. the Contractor Shall BE Responsible and Accountable for Achieving the Required Results. Core Requirement Functions, Such AS Configuration Management, Quality Assurance, ETC. ARE Required to Support Idiq Task Orders. the Space Network (SN) IS Comprised of a Fleet of On-Orbit Tracking and Data Relay Satellites (tdrs) and Associated Ground Systems That Provide Telecommunications Services. the Nature of the SN Architecture, I.E., Extremely Large Capital Investment, Contractor Operated Facilities, Continuous 24X7 Requirements, ETC., Lends Itself to a Core Requirements Approach. the Ground Network (GN) Consists of an Orbital Tracking Network and the Satellite Laser Ranging Network. the Nature of the Ground Network Architecture, I.E., Diverse MIX of Commercial and Government Assets, Evolving Geographic and Technical Customer Requirements, and Legacy Systems, ETC. Lends Itself to an Idiq Approach. Other Activities, I.E., Very Long Baseline Interferometry Network Operations and Maintenance (O&M), Electronic System Test Laboratory, Requirements Development, Hardware and Software Development, ETC. ARE Best Suited to an Idiq Approach in the Resource-Constrained Environment That Nasa Operates in — $1.2B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Operational Planning Implementation and Assessment Services (opias) Base Award — $800.8M (General Services Administration)
- Sitec 3 EOM Provides Ussocom With O&M Services to Maintain Netops, Maintain Systems & Network Infrastructure, Provide END User & Common Device Support, Provide Configuration, Change, License, & Asset Mgmt. Conduct Training and Perform Imacs Services — $651.0M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts
- Contact Center Operations (CCO) — $5.5B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS Oper of Govt R&D Goco Facilities — $4.8B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide the Full Complement of Services Necessary to Care for UC in ORR Custody Including Facilities Set-Up, Maintenance, and Support Internal and Perimeter (IF Applicable) Security, Direct Care and Supervision Inc — $3.5B (Rapid Deployment Inc)
- Contact Center Operations — $2.6B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- Federal Contract — $2.4B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →