HHS Spends $124.6M on Computer Systems Design Services with Northrop Grumman

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $124,638,211 ($124.6M)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2011-05-01

End Date: 2015-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,705 days

Daily Burn Rate: $73.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: OTHER ADP&TELECOMMUNICATIONS SVCS

Place of Performance

Location: MC LEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $124.6 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: OTHER ADP&TELECOMMUNICATIONS SVCS Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $124.6 million awarded to a single large business. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of over 4 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The use of Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $124.6 million for computer systems design services over approximately 4 years is substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for complex IT services is difficult without more granular data on the specific services provided, but the CPFF structure warrants close monitoring.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which is generally positive for price discovery. However, the specific details of the bidding process and the number of bids received are not provided, making it hard to fully assess the competitive intensity and its impact on the final price.

Taxpayer Impact: While competition was employed, the CPFF contract type introduces potential for costs to exceed initial estimates, impacting the overall value for taxpayers. Effective oversight is crucial to mitigate this risk.

Public Impact

Taxpayers are funding essential IT services for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The contract supports critical healthcare administration functions through technology. Potential for cost escalation under the CPFF contract type requires vigilant oversight.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee pricing structure
  • Long contract duration
  • Lack of specific performance metrics
  • No indication of small business participation

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition utilized
  • Awarded to a well-established contractor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT and professional services sector, specifically computer systems design. Spending in this area is critical for government operations, but benchmarks vary widely based on the complexity and scope of services. The value here is significant for a single contract.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). There is no information provided on subcontracting opportunities for small businesses, which is a missed opportunity for broader economic impact.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's duration and CPFF structure necessitate robust oversight from the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure cost control and performance. Regular audits and performance reviews are essential to hold the contractor accountable and protect taxpayer funds.

Related Government Programs

  • Computer Systems Design Services
  • Department of Health and Human Services Contracting
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure
  • Lack of transparency on specific deliverables and performance metrics
  • No small business participation noted
  • Long contract duration may indicate a lack of flexibility or innovation

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, department-of-health-and-human-services, va, do, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $124.6 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. OTHER ADP&TELECOMMUNICATIONS SVCS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $124.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-05-01. End: 2015-12-31.

What specific computer systems design services were rendered under this contract, and how do they align with CMS's core mission objectives?

The contract for 'Computer Systems Design Services' (NAICS 541512) likely encompassed a range of activities such as system analysis, design, development, integration, and potentially maintenance of IT systems supporting CMS operations. These services are crucial for managing Medicare and Medicaid programs, processing claims, and maintaining beneficiary data. The alignment would depend on the specific projects undertaken, but generally, such services are fundamental to the agency's technological infrastructure and operational efficiency.

Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure, what mechanisms were in place to control costs and prevent scope creep?

CPFF contracts require stringent oversight to manage costs. Mechanisms likely included detailed work breakdown structures, regular progress reviews, baseline cost tracking against performance, and defined ceilings for allowable costs. The government contracting officer and technical team would need to actively monitor expenditures, approve any changes to the scope of work through formal modification processes, and ensure that the fixed fee remained appropriate based on performance and effort.

How was the success and effectiveness of Northrop Grumman's performance measured throughout the contract's duration?

Effectiveness would typically be measured against pre-defined performance standards and metrics outlined in the contract's statement of work. This could include factors like system uptime, successful implementation of new features, adherence to project timelines, quality of deliverables, and user satisfaction. Formal performance evaluations, contractor performance assessment reporting (CPARs), and milestone reviews would have been used to document and assess the contractor's success.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation (UEI: 967356127)

Address: 8110 GATEHOUSE RD, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $126,926,656

Exercised Options: $124,638,211

Current Obligation: $124,638,211

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HHSM500200700014I

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-05-01

Current End Date: 2015-12-31

Potential End Date: 2015-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-09-18

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending