FDA Awards $35.6M Software Contract to Booz Allen Hamilton for CBER Program

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $35,570,720 ($35.6M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2007-09-24

End Date: 2010-12-20

Contract Duration: 1,183 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: TAS::75 0600::TAS OIT CBER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE PROG

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20857, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $35.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: TAS::75 0600::TAS OIT CBER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE PROG Key points: 1. Contract value of $35.6M over 3 years. 2. Booz Allen Hamilton is the sole awardee. 3. Potential risk due to lack of competition. 4. Spending is within the IT sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded as a delivery order under a larger contract. Without knowing the original contract's pricing structure and competition, it's difficult to assess value. The time and materials pricing could lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This was a delivery order, suggesting it might have been competed under a broader contract. However, the data indicates only one awardee, implying limited competition for this specific order. This lack of direct competition may have impacted price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for software development and maintenance. The effectiveness of competition directly impacts the value for money received.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation of critical CBER software. Supports FDA's mission in regulating biological products. Potential for cost efficiencies through competitive bidding.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition for the delivery order.
Time and materials pricing can inflate costs.
Contract duration is significant.

Positive Signals

Supports a critical government function.
Awarded to a known contractor.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Information Technology sector, specifically software development and maintenance. IT spending benchmarks vary widely, but consistent funding for critical systems is common.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in this specific delivery order. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the FDA program office responsible for CBER. Accountability for performance and cost would be tied to the contract terms and delivery order requirements.

Related Government Programs

Department of Health and Human Services Contracting
Food and Drug Administration Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of clear competition for the delivery order.
Potential for cost overruns with Time and Materials.
Contract duration and value warrant close monitoring.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical software.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $35.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. TAS::75 0600::TAS OIT CBER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE PROG

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Food and Drug Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $35.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-09-24. End: 2010-12-20.

What was the original contract under which this delivery order was placed, and what was its competitive history?

The provided data does not specify the parent contract. Understanding the original contract's procurement method and competition is crucial for a complete value assessment. If the parent contract was competitively awarded, it provides some assurance, but the limited competition for this specific order remains a point of concern.

Are there established benchmarks for CBER software development and maintenance costs to assess this contract's pricing?

Without specific benchmarks for CBER software development and maintenance, a direct cost comparison is challenging. However, time and materials contracts inherently carry a risk of cost escalation if not meticulously managed and monitored against project milestones and deliverables.

How effectively has Booz Allen Hamilton delivered on similar software maintenance contracts for government agencies?

Assessing Booz Allen Hamilton's past performance on similar contracts would provide insight into their reliability and efficiency. Positive past performance could mitigate some of the risks associated with limited competition and time-and-materials pricing, suggesting a higher likelihood of successful project completion.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR # 700, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $35,570,720

Exercised Options: $35,570,720

Current Obligation: $35,570,720

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 26301D0072

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline