HHS CDC awards $10.19M for Custom Computer Programming Services to Northrop Grumman via full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,186,164 ($10.2M)
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Start Date: 2004-09-01
End Date: 2008-08-31
Contract Duration: 1,460 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: MULTIPLE CONTRACT TYPES
Place of Performance
Location: ATLANTA, DEKALB County, GEORGIA, 30329
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Health and Human Services obligated $10.2 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: MULTIPLE CONTRACT TYPES Key points: 1. Total contract value of $10.19M over 4 years. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting market availability. 3. Risk appears moderate given the contract type and duration. 4. Sector is IT services, specifically custom programming.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract uses a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar CPFF contracts for custom programming services is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives fair market value.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the most cost-effective method for taxpayers, as it drives down prices through market forces.
Public Impact
Ensures access to specialized IT programming for public health initiatives. Supports critical functions of the CDC through custom software solutions. Potential for innovation in public health data management and analysis.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- CPFF pricing structure can incentivize cost escalation.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
- Long contract duration may not adapt to rapidly changing tech needs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Supports a critical government agency (CDC).
- Northrop Grumman is a large, established contractor.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically custom computer programming. Spending in this area is substantial across government, supporting everything from IT infrastructure to specialized application development.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. Given the prime contractor is Northrop Grumman, it's likely that any small business involvement would be as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically involve regular performance reviews, cost audits, and adherence to contract terms by the CDC. The CPFF structure necessitates close monitoring of expenditures and contractor performance to ensure value.
Related Government Programs
- Custom Computer Programming Services
- Department of Health and Human Services Contracting
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics.
- Contract duration may lead to outdated technology.
- Limited visibility into subcontractor performance.
Tags
custom-computer-programming-services, department-of-health-and-human-services, ga, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Health and Human Services awarded $10.2 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. MULTIPLE CONTRACT TYPES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-09-01. End: 2008-08-31.
What was the specific scope of work for these custom computer programming services, and how did it align with the CDC's mission?
The provided data lacks specifics on the scope of work. However, custom computer programming services for the CDC likely involved developing, maintaining, or enhancing software systems critical for public health surveillance, data analysis, disease tracking, or operational support. The alignment would be directly tied to enabling the CDC's core functions through tailored technological solutions.
How effectively was the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure managed to control costs and ensure value for the taxpayer?
Effective management of a CPFF contract requires rigorous oversight of contractor expenditures, detailed progress reporting, and clear definition of fixed fee milestones. Without access to performance reports and cost audits, it's impossible to definitively assess cost control effectiveness. However, the potential for cost overruns is inherent in this pricing model.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract and the quality of the programming services delivered?
The provided data does not specify the KPIs. Typically, for custom programming, KPIs might include software functionality meeting requirements, on-time delivery of milestones, system performance and reliability, user satisfaction, and adherence to security protocols. The absence of this information limits a full assessment of service quality and contract effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation
Address: 12011 SUNSET HILLS RD, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $1,401,943,213
Exercised Options: $1,185,258,759
Current Obligation: $10,186,164
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HHSD200200403409I
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-09-01
Current End Date: 2008-08-31
Potential End Date: 2008-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-12-30
More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
- 200506!000026!5700!fa8214!oo-Alc/Pkme/Lmke !F4261098C0001 !A!N! !Y! !p01502!20041213!20050701!001563738!004179453!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Space & Missi!888 S 2000 E !clearfield !ut!84015!13850!011!49!clearfield !davis !utah !-000001960000!n!n!000000000000!l014!tech REP Svcs/Guided Missiles !A2 !missile and Space Systems !302 !minuteman III GRP !541330!E! !3! ! !C! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!l!2!002!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $10.0B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-7) — $8.5B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-2) — $5.4B (Department of Defense)
- First DDT and E, Ares I-X, and Flight Tests. First Stage Will BE a Five Segment, Solid Rocket Booster Derived From the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) Solid Rocket Booster (srb)/Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (rsrm). the Contractor Shall Furnish the Necessary Management, Engineering, Labor, Facilities, Tools, Equipment, and Materials Required for First Stage Development, Qualification, Certification and Acceptance Program. Activities Include: Redesign and Testing of the Motor to Incorporate the Fifth Segment and Production of Five Full Scale Ground Static Test Motors: TWO Development Motors (dms)-And Three Qualification Motors (QMS); Structural Test Article (STA), Ground Vibration Test Motors (gvtms) and Other Development Testing; Redesign of the Avionics, Deceleration, Separation, and Flight Termination System (FTS) Subsystems; Ares I-X: Simulated Ares I Outer Mold Line/Mass Properties Using Modified Srb/Rsrm; and Three Flight Test Vehicles. TAS::80 0124::TAS — $4.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Federal Contract — $4.4B (Department of Defense)
View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts
- Contact Center Operations (CCO) — $5.5B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS Oper of Govt R&D Goco Facilities — $4.8B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide the Full Complement of Services Necessary to Care for UC in ORR Custody Including Facilities Set-Up, Maintenance, and Support Internal and Perimeter (IF Applicable) Security, Direct Care and Supervision Inc — $3.5B (Rapid Deployment Inc)
- Contact Center Operations — $2.6B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- Federal Contract — $2.4B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →