Department of Defense awards $6.8M facilities support contract to Compass Contract Services (U.K.) Limited

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,811,135 ($6.8M)

Contractor: Compass Contract Services (U.K.) Limited

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-12-03

End Date: 2026-04-01

Contract Duration: 1,945 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: UK CUSTODIAL SERVICES

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $6.8 million to COMPASS CONTRACT SERVICES (U.K.) LIMITED for work described as: UK CUSTODIAL SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1945 days indicates a long-term need for these services. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to facilities support services. 5. The award was made by the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA). 6. The contractor, Compass Contract Services (U.K.) Limited, is a UK-based entity.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $6.8 million contract for custodial services is challenging without specific performance metrics or detailed service scope. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests the government has negotiated a set price for defined services, which can be advantageous if the contractor efficiently manages costs. Comparing this to similar contracts would require access to detailed scopes of work and pricing structures for other facilities support services awarded by DoDEA or the broader Department of Defense.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this requirement. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions, but three bidders still provide a basis for price discovery and selection of the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process, with multiple bidders, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages competitive pricing and can lead to cost savings compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are students and staff within the Department of Defense Education Activity facilities, who will receive custodial services. The services delivered include general custodial support, contributing to a safe and clean learning environment. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the specific DoDEA facilities where the services are being performed. The contract supports jobs within the facilities support services sector, potentially including both direct employees of Compass Contract Services and indirect employment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price contract scope is not precisely defined or if unforeseen circumstances arise.
Dependence on a single contractor for essential facility maintenance could pose a risk if performance issues emerge.
Limited transparency into the specific performance metrics and quality control measures employed by the contractor.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a structured procurement process.
Long contract duration suggests a stable and reliable service provision for the duration.
Contractor is a UK-based entity, potentially indicating international sourcing capabilities for the DoD.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, is a broad sector encompassing a range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and other facilities. This includes services such as cleaning, janitorial, and general maintenance. The market for these services is substantial, driven by government agencies, commercial enterprises, and institutions requiring upkeep of their physical infrastructure. This contract fits within the government's broader spending on base operations and facility management.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside, as indicated by 'sb': false. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary contract was awarded to a large business, and opportunities for small businesses would likely be through direct subcontracting by Compass Contract Services, if they choose to engage them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) contracting officer and their representatives. Accountability measures would be defined within the contract's statement of work and performance standards. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed performance reports or audits may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
DoD Education Activity Operations
Government Custodial Services Contracts
Base Operations Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Contract Type
Competition Level

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $6.8 million to COMPASS CONTRACT SERVICES (U.K.) LIMITED. UK CUSTODIAL SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COMPASS CONTRACT SERVICES (U.K.) LIMITED.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of Defense Education Activity).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-12-03. End: 2026-04-01.

What is the specific scope of custodial services included in this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 561210, Facilities Support Services, and is for 'UK CUSTODIAL SERVICES'. However, the precise details of the scope of work, such as the frequency of cleaning, specific areas to be covered (e.g., classrooms, offices, restrooms, common areas), types of cleaning required (e.g., daily, weekly, deep cleaning), and any specialized services (e.g., floor care, window washing), are not detailed in the summary data. A comprehensive understanding of the services would require reviewing the contract's Statement of Work (SOW).

How does the awarded amount of $6.8 million compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the DoD?

Direct comparison of the $6.8 million award to similar contracts is difficult without more specific data points like contract duration, service scope, and geographic location. However, for context, large federal agencies often award multi-million dollar contracts for facilities support services, which can range from routine maintenance to comprehensive base operations. The duration of this contract (1945 days, approximately 5.3 years) suggests a significant, ongoing requirement. The firm-fixed-price nature implies a defined service level for the total cost, which is a common and often preferred contract type for predictable services.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The summary data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, for custodial services, KPIs might include response times for reported issues, cleanliness ratings based on inspections, adherence to schedules, and safety compliance. These metrics are crucial for ensuring the contractor meets the required standards and for evaluating their performance throughout the contract period. The Department of Defense Education Activity would have established these metrics within the contract's SOW.

What is the track record of Compass Contract Services (U.K.) Limited with the Department of Defense or other government agencies?

Information on the specific track record of Compass Contract Services (U.K.) Limited with the Department of Defense or other government agencies is not provided in the summary data. To assess their track record, one would typically look at past performance evaluations, any history of contract disputes or terminations, and the successful completion of similar contracts. As a UK-based entity, their experience with US federal contracts would be a key factor in evaluating their suitability and reliability for this award.

What is the potential impact of the firm-fixed-price contract type on cost management and contractor performance?

A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type means the contractor agrees to a set price for the defined scope of work, regardless of their actual costs. This shifts the cost risk to the contractor, incentivizing them to manage their expenses efficiently to maximize profit. For the government, it provides cost certainty. However, it also means that if the contractor encounters unforeseen difficulties or inefficiencies, they bear the loss. For performance, the FFP structure can motivate timely and quality delivery to avoid costly rework or penalties, but it relies heavily on a well-defined SOW to prevent scope creep or disputes.

How does the competition level (3 bidders) influence the value and pricing for this contract?

Having three bidders for this contract suggests a moderate level of competition. While more bidders generally lead to more aggressive pricing and potentially better value, three offers still provide a basis for price discovery and comparison. The government can assess the offers against each other and potentially negotiate terms. This level of competition is generally considered adequate to prevent a sole-source situation and encourage reasonable pricing, though it may not yield the absolute lowest price achievable in a highly saturated market. The selection would likely be based on a combination of price and non-price factors.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: HE125421R1000

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Compass Group PLC

Address: PARKLANDS COURT, 24 PARKLANDS, BIRMINGHAM

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,161,542

Exercised Options: $6,811,135

Current Obligation: $6,811,135

Actual Outlays: $1,362,975

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline