DoD's Defense Commissary Agency Spends $11M on All Other Support Services with PRIDE INDUSTRIES

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,065,797 ($11.1M)

Contractor: Pride Industries

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-05-26

End Date: 2009-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,892 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Place of Performance

Location: VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH (CITY) County, VIRGINIA, 23460

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.1 million to PRIDE INDUSTRIES for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant spending of $11.07M on support services. 2. Contract awarded to PRIDE INDUSTRIES, a single vendor. 3. Potential for limited competition due to contract type. 4. Sector is Defense, with specific focus on commissary support.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $11.07M over 5 years is substantial. Without comparable contracts or detailed service descriptions, assessing value for money is difficult. The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status further complicates pricing assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not available for competition, indicating a limited or sole-source approach. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a fully competitive environment.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in the government paying more than necessary for these support services, impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the absence of competitive bidding. Reliance on a single vendor for essential support services could pose a risk if the vendor fails to perform. The long contract duration (5 years) means potential inefficiencies are locked in.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpayment
Vendor lock-in

Positive Signals

Established vendor relationship
Long-term service provision

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting the Defense Commissary Agency. Spending benchmarks for 'All Other Support Services' can vary widely, but significant single-vendor contracts warrant scrutiny for efficiency.

Small Business Impact

Information on small business participation is not available for this contract. The focus on a single, likely larger, vendor may limit opportunities for small businesses in this service area.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status suggests a need for robust oversight to ensure the awarded vendor is performing adequately and that the pricing remains reasonable throughout the contract term.

Related Government Programs

All Other Support Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Commissary Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competitive bidding
Potential for inflated pricing
Limited transparency on service details
Long contract duration without re-evaluation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.1 million to PRIDE INDUSTRIES. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PRIDE INDUSTRIES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-05-26. End: 2009-07-31.

What specific support services are being provided under this contract, and how do they align with the agency's core mission?

The contract covers 'All Other Support Services' (NAICS 561990), a broad category. Without further detail, it's unclear if these services are mission-critical or administrative. Understanding the exact nature of the services is crucial for assessing their necessity and value for money, especially given the lack of competition.

What justification was provided for not making this contract available for competition?

The justification for 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' is critical. Typically, this requires demonstrating a unique capability, urgent need, or lack of other sources. Without this justification, it's impossible to assess if the government acted prudently or missed an opportunity for better pricing and service through competition.

How does the contract's pricing compare to industry benchmarks for similar support services, considering the lack of competition?

Benchmarking is challenging without competitive data. The government likely relied on internal estimates or historical pricing. However, the absence of competition inherently raises concerns about whether the negotiated price truly reflects fair market value. A post-award review comparing actual costs to industry averages would be beneficial.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Other Support Services › All Other Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10030 FOOTHILLS BLVD, ROSEVILLE, CA, 03

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline