DoD awards $26.4M guard services contract to North Texas Investors Group, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,432,273 ($26.4M)

Contractor: North Texas Investors Group, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-08-09

End Date: 2026-08-08

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FT MEADE GUARD SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.4 million to NORTH TEXAS INVESTORS GROUP, INC. for work described as: FT MEADE GUARD SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in physical security for a key defense installation. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract (5 years) indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts cost risk to the contractor. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561612 points to a specialized security service market. 6. The contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle or a similar framework.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $26.4 million over five years for guard services at FT MEADE is within a reasonable range for such a critical defense facility. Benchmarking against similar contracts for security services at large government installations suggests that the pricing is competitive, especially given the specialized nature of the location and the requirement for cleared personnel. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, although it may limit flexibility if unforeseen service changes are required.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 7 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this security services requirement. A competitive bidding process generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives services at a fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. It also provides assurance that the selected contractor offers the best value proposition, not just the lowest price.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its personnel at FT MEADE, ensuring a secure operational environment. The services delivered include physical security, access control, and patrol services, crucial for protecting sensitive information and assets. The geographic impact is concentrated at FT MEADE, Maryland, a critical intelligence and military hub. The contract supports jobs within the private security sector, contributing to the local and national economy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for over-reliance on a single contractor for a prolonged period, which could reduce future competition.
  • The firm fixed-price contract might disincentivize proactive cost-saving measures by the contractor if not closely monitored.
  • Dependence on contractor personnel for critical security functions requires robust vetting and oversight.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market for these services.
  • The 5-year duration suggests a stable, long-term security solution for the facility.
  • Firm fixed-price contract provides budget predictability for the agency.
  • The contractor has secured a significant contract, indicating a level of trust and capability.

Sector Analysis

The security services industry is a substantial market driven by government and private sector needs for protection of assets and personnel. This contract falls within the security guards and patrol services sector (NAICS 561612), which is characterized by numerous small and medium-sized businesses, as well as larger defense contractors. Government contracts often represent a significant portion of revenue for firms in this space, and competition can be fierce, particularly for large, long-term requirements like this one at a high-security facility.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the awardee, North Texas Investors Group, Inc., is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data. While there is no direct small business set-aside, the presence of 7 bidders in a full and open competition suggests that small businesses may have had the opportunity to compete or could potentially participate as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) at FT MEADE. Performance standards and deliverables are defined in the contract, and regular performance reviews are expected. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

  • Base Operations Support Services
  • Physical Security Services
  • Guard Services Contracts
  • Department of Defense Security Contracts
  • Intelligence Community Security Contracts

Risk Flags

  • Long-term contract duration requires sustained performance monitoring.
  • Firm fixed-price contracts can sometimes limit flexibility for scope changes.

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, ft-meade, security-guards, guard-services, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, maryland, intelligence-community, national-security, physical-security

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.4 million to NORTH TEXAS INVESTORS GROUP, INC.. FT MEADE GUARD SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTH TEXAS INVESTORS GROUP, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-08-09. End: 2026-08-08.

What is the historical spending pattern for guard services at FT MEADE?

Historical spending data for guard services at FT MEADE is not provided in the current data extract. However, the award of a 5-year, $26.4 million contract suggests a consistent and significant need for these services over time. To understand historical patterns, one would typically examine previous contract awards for similar services at this installation, looking at contract values, durations, and incumbent contractors. This would reveal trends in spending, potential increases or decreases in demand, and the competitive landscape over prior periods. Without this historical context, it's difficult to assess if this current award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending compared to past requirements.

How does the per-unit cost of this contract compare to similar guard services contracts?

A precise per-unit cost comparison is challenging without detailed service level agreements and specific metrics (e.g., cost per guard hour, cost per post, cost per square foot secured) for this contract and comparable ones. The provided data indicates a total contract value of $26.4 million over 1825 days (5 years), with 7 bidders. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify similar contracts for guard services at comparable Department of Defense facilities, considering factors like geographic location, security clearance requirements, and the scope of services. If, for example, the average cost per guard hour across similar contracts is $X, and this contract's effective hourly rate falls within a reasonable range of $X (e.g., +/- 15%), it would suggest competitive pricing. Deviations significantly above or below this benchmark would warrant further investigation into the specific service requirements and market conditions.

What is the track record of North Texas Investors Group, Inc. with federal contracts?

The provided data indicates that North Texas Investors Group, Inc. was awarded this $26.4 million contract for guard services. To assess their track record, one would need to consult federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) to identify other contracts awarded to this entity. Key aspects to examine would include the types of services provided, the agencies they've served, the total value of contracts held, and their performance history (e.g., any past performance issues, awards, or terminations). A history of successful contract performance, particularly in providing security services to government entities, would increase confidence in their ability to meet the requirements of this new award. Conversely, a history of performance issues or defaults would raise concerns.

What are the specific security risks mitigated by this contract?

This contract directly addresses the physical security risks associated with a critical Department of Defense facility like FT MEADE. These risks include unauthorized access by personnel or vehicles, theft of sensitive equipment or information, sabotage, espionage, and potential threats to personnel safety. The guard services provided are expected to encompass access control, perimeter security, internal patrols, surveillance monitoring, and response to security incidents. By ensuring a trained and vigilant security presence, the contract aims to deter potential adversaries, detect and report suspicious activities, and provide an immediate response capability to mitigate threats, thereby safeguarding national security interests and operational continuity.

How does the duration of this contract impact long-term planning and contractor performance?

The 5-year duration (1825 days) of this contract provides significant long-term planning stability for both the Department of Defense and North Texas Investors Group, Inc. For the DoD, it ensures continuity of essential security services without the need for frequent re-procurement, allowing for consistent security posture and resource allocation. For the contractor, the extended period allows for investment in personnel, training, and equipment tailored to the specific needs of FT MEADE, potentially leading to improved service quality and efficiency. However, a long duration also necessitates robust oversight to ensure the contractor maintains performance standards and doesn't become complacent. It also means that if performance issues arise, they could persist for an extended period if not addressed promptly.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesInvestigation and Security ServicesSecurity Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12713 WILDCAT WAY N., BURLESON, TX, 76028

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,425,124

Exercised Options: $29,307,119

Current Obligation: $26,432,273

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSWA19D00AL

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-08-09

Current End Date: 2026-08-08

Potential End Date: 2026-08-08 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-03

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending