DoD's $27M REDSEAL License: Full Competition After Exclusion of Sources Raises Questions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,031,461 ($27.0M)

Contractor: Norseman Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-12-19

End Date: 2021-12-30

Contract Duration: 1,837 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: REDSEAL UNLIMITIED TERM LICENSE

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $27.0 million to NORSEMAN INC for work described as: REDSEAL UNLIMITIED TERM LICENSE Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $27 million for a software license. 2. Competition method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' warrants scrutiny. 3. Potential risk associated with the exclusion of sources impacting price discovery. 4. IT sector spending, specifically 'Other Computer Related Services', is a key area.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $27,031,461 for a term license is substantial. Benchmarking against similar unlimited term licenses for enterprise software is difficult without specific product details, but the competition method raises concerns about whether the government achieved the best possible price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. While this indicates an attempt at broad competition, the exclusion of specific sources suggests a potentially narrowed field, which could impact the effectiveness of price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs.

Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources, even with a stated full and open competition, may limit competitive pressure, potentially resulting in higher costs for taxpayers than if all potential sources were considered.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying more due to a potentially limited competitive landscape. The effectiveness of the procurement process for IT software licenses is called into question. Lack of transparency regarding the 'exclusion of sources' could hinder public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Competition method raises concerns about price discovery.
  • Exclusion of sources limits potential bidders.
  • Lack of specific product details hinders value assessment.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under a full and open competition framework.
  • Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically 'Other Computer Related Services'. Spending in this area is consistently high across government agencies, with a constant need for software licenses and related services. Benchmarks are highly variable based on the specific software and licensing model.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this procurement. The nature of large enterprise software licenses often favors larger, established vendors, potentially limiting small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) under the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract management by DISA officials to ensure compliance with terms and conditions, and adherence to procurement regulations.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Computer Related Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Information Systems Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Competition method raises concerns about price discovery.
  • Exclusion of sources may limit competitive pressure.
  • Lack of transparency regarding source exclusion.
  • Potential for overpayment due to narrowed competition.
  • Difficulty in benchmarking value without product specifics.

Tags

other-computer-related-services, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $27.0 million to NORSEMAN INC. REDSEAL UNLIMITIED TERM LICENSE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORSEMAN INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-12-19. End: 2021-12-30.

What specific criteria led to the exclusion of certain sources in this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award, and how did this impact the final price?

The exclusion of sources typically occurs when specific technical requirements, security mandates, or existing infrastructure compatibility necessitate a limited pool of vendors. Without knowing the exact reasons for exclusion, it's difficult to definitively state the price impact. However, reducing the number of potential bidders generally decreases competitive pressure, which could lead to a higher price than if a truly open competition had been feasible.

How does the $27 million cost for an unlimited term license compare to industry standards for similar enterprise software, considering the competition method used?

Assessing the value of an unlimited term license at $27 million requires detailed knowledge of the specific software product, its capabilities, and the user base it supports. The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method introduces a caveat; while competition existed, it wasn't fully open. This suggests the price might be higher than if all potential vendors could have bid, making direct comparison to industry standards challenging without further context on the software's market position and the impact of the source exclusion.

What are the long-term implications for the Department of Defense's IT infrastructure and budget given this significant, potentially non-optimally priced, software license?

A $27 million investment in a software license represents a significant commitment. If the exclusion of sources led to a suboptimal price, the DoD may face increased long-term costs for this capability. This could strain future IT budgets, potentially diverting funds from other critical needs or requiring budget increases. Furthermore, reliance on a limited vendor pool could create future lock-in risks and limit flexibility in adopting newer, potentially more cost-effective technologies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8172 LARK BROWN RD STE 201, ELKRIDGE, MD, 21075

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $31,793,961

Exercised Options: $27,031,461

Current Obligation: $27,031,461

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNG15SC83B

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2016-12-19

Current End Date: 2021-12-30

Potential End Date: 2021-12-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-17

More Contracts from Norseman Inc

View all Norseman Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending