DoD's $23.6M computer training contract awarded to Foxhole Technology LLC shows fair value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,615,182 ($23.6M)

Contractor: Foxhole Technology LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-04-18

End Date: 2018-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,473 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF LABOR

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.6 million to FOXHOLE TECHNOLOGY LLC for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF LABOR Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and scope of services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment. 3. No significant risk indicators identified in the contract award. 4. Performance context is within standard IT training delivery for defense agencies. 5. This contract fits within the broader IT services sector for government training. 6. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of $23.6 million over approximately 4 years (1473 days) suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar IT training contracts within the Department of Defense is challenging without more granular data on specific training modules and user counts. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the award indicates that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government. The number of bids received (2) is on the lower side for full and open competition, which could slightly temper the assessment of value, but the final price is presumed to be competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. While the data shows two bids were received, the process itself suggests a competitive environment was sought. The limited number of bidders could imply a specialized niche or a market with fewer qualified vendors for this specific type of training. Nevertheless, the competition mechanism is designed to encourage price discovery and ensure the government receives competitive offers.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with a limited number of bidders, generally benefits taxpayers by promoting a more level playing field and encouraging competitive pricing compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Public Impact

Military and civilian personnel within the Department of Defense are the primary beneficiaries, receiving essential computer training. Services delivered include computer training, likely covering software, hardware, and IT systems relevant to defense operations. The geographic impact is likely nationwide within DoD facilities, supporting personnel across various bases and commands. Workforce implications include the potential for upskilling DoD personnel and supporting the IT workforce's technical proficiency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited number of bidders (2) in a full and open competition could suggest potential market concentration or high barriers to entry for other firms.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to fully assess the quality and effectiveness of the training delivered.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, maximizing potential for competitive pricing.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty and transfers risk to the contractor.
Contract duration of over 4 years suggests a stable, long-term need for these services.
Awarded to a single contractor, potentially allowing for specialized expertise and streamlined service delivery.

Sector Analysis

The IT training sector within government contracting is a significant market, driven by the constant need to update skills and adapt to new technologies. This contract falls within the broader IT services category, specifically focusing on training and education. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large-scale IT training contracts awarded by federal agencies, particularly within the defense sector, to assess if the $23.6 million over four years represents a competitive rate for the services rendered.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside requirement. The primary contractor, Foxhole Technology LLC, would determine any subcontracting opportunities based on their business strategy and the nature of the training services required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected or reported.

Related Government Programs

DoD IT Services Contracts
Federal IT Training Programs
Defense Information Systems Agency Procurements
Information Technology Professional Services
Government Computer Education Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited number of bidders in full and open competition.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in summary data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.6 million to FOXHOLE TECHNOLOGY LLC. IGF::CL::IGF LABOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FOXHOLE TECHNOLOGY LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-04-18. End: 2018-04-30.

What is the specific nature of the computer training provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 611420, which corresponds to 'Computer Training'. This suggests the training likely covers a range of IT-related skills, potentially including software proficiency, cybersecurity awareness, network administration, system operations, or specialized defense IT systems. Without more detailed contract line item numbers (CLINs) or a statement of work (SOW), the precise curriculum and depth of training remain unspecified. However, given the awarding agency (DISA), the training is expected to be tailored to the operational needs and technological infrastructure of the Department of Defense.

How does the per-contractor value compare to similar IT training contracts within the DoD?

Direct per-contractor value comparison is difficult without access to detailed contract specifics like the number of trainees, duration of each training session, and the complexity of the subject matter. The total award of $23.6 million over approximately 1473 days (roughly 4 years) averages to about $6.3 million per year. This figure needs to be contextualized against the scale of the DoD's training needs. For instance, if this contract supports thousands of personnel across various training modules, the annual spend might be considered efficient. Conversely, if it serves a smaller, more specialized group, it might represent a higher per-participant cost. Benchmarking requires comparing similar scope, duration, and service levels.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract award?

The primary risk indicators identified are relatively low based on the available data. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which generally mitigates risks associated with lack of market research or limited vendor pools. The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor, which is favorable for the government. However, a potential area of concern could be the limited number of bids received (2) in a full and open competition. This might suggest a niche market or potential barriers to entry for other qualified vendors, which could indirectly impact long-term competition or innovation. Additionally, the lack of detailed performance metrics in the summary data prevents a full assessment of performance risk.

What is the historical spending pattern for computer training by the Defense Information Systems Agency?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for computer training by DISA requires accessing comprehensive federal procurement databases over multiple fiscal years. The provided data only captures a single contract award ($23.6M from 2014-2018). To establish a pattern, one would need to aggregate spending on NAICS code 611420 (Computer Training) and potentially related IT training codes awarded by DISA. This would reveal trends in contract values, types of training procured, primary contractors, and fluctuations in spending over time. Without this broader historical context, it's impossible to determine if this specific contract represents a typical, increased, or decreased level of investment in computer training by DISA.

What is the track record of Foxhole Technology LLC in fulfilling federal IT training contracts?

The provided data identifies Foxhole Technology LLC as the contractor for this $23.6 million computer training contract with the Department of Defense (DISA). To assess their track record, one would need to examine their performance history on this and other federal contracts. This includes reviewing past performance evaluations, any contract modifications, delivery timeliness, and adherence to quality standards. Information on previous contracts awarded to Foxhole Technology LLC, their values, durations, and the agencies they served would provide a clearer picture of their experience and reliability in delivering IT training services to the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Computer Training

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 11781 LEE JACKSON HWY STE 250, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,251,787

Exercised Options: $23,615,182

Current Obligation: $23,615,182

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0569V

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline