DoD's $41.2M Computer Facilities Management Services Contract Awarded to Peraton Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $41,204,504 ($41.2M)
Contractor: Peraton Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-04-14
End Date: 2016-06-28
Contract Duration: 1,902 days
Daily Burn Rate: $21.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: LABOR
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22203
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $41.2 million to PERATON INC. for work described as: LABOR Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $41.2 million for essential IT services. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of 1902 days indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. Services fall under Computer Facilities Management, a critical area for defense operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $41.2 million for 1902 days suggests a reasonable annual spend. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT service contracts would provide further insight into its cost-effectiveness.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which typically leads to competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The presence of multiple bids would have further validated price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely benefited from a fair market price for these critical IT services.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operation of critical defense information systems. Supports the Department of Defense's technological infrastructure. Provides essential IT management services to a key agency.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.
- Reliance on a single vendor for critical IT functions.
- Scope creep could increase costs beyond initial estimates.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process likely secured favorable pricing.
- Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery.
- Services are essential for national security operations.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on computer facilities management. Spending in this area is substantial across government agencies, with benchmarks varying based on service scope and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting larger, established firms were likely the primary bidders.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), a component of the Department of Defense, implying established oversight mechanisms. However, the duration of the contract warrants ongoing monitoring for performance and cost efficiency.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Facilities Management Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Information Systems Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in
- Reliance on a single provider for critical IT infrastructure
- Risk of cost overruns due to scope creep
- Ensuring consistent service quality over a long contract period
Tags
computer-facilities-management-services, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $41.2 million to PERATON INC.. LABOR
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PERATON INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $41.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-04-14. End: 2016-06-28.
What was the total number of bids received during the full and open competition, and how did the winning bid compare to others?
The provided data does not specify the number of bids received. To assess the effectiveness of the competition, it would be beneficial to know how many proposals were submitted and the relative pricing and technical merits of each, ensuring the government secured the best overall value.
Are there any performance metrics or key performance indicators (KPIs) associated with this contract to ensure service quality and mitigate risks?
The data does not detail specific performance metrics or KPIs. For a contract of this duration and criticality, establishing clear KPIs for uptime, response times, and issue resolution is crucial for ensuring service quality and holding the contractor accountable for meeting expectations.
How does the per-unit cost of these computer facilities management services compare to industry benchmarks for similar government contracts?
Without specific details on the services rendered and their breakdown, a precise per-unit cost benchmark is difficult. However, the total value and duration suggest a significant investment. Comparing the annual cost to similar large-scale IT service contracts managed by other federal agencies would provide a valuable benchmark.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Facilities Management Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 950 N GLEBE RD STE 1100, ARLINGTON, VA, 22203
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $41,204,504
Exercised Options: $41,204,504
Current Obligation: $41,204,504
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS35F0149K
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-04-14
Current End Date: 2016-06-28
Potential End Date: 2016-06-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-06-14
More Contracts from Peraton Inc.
- 200107!000034!5700!GZ80 !smc/Pks !F0470101C0001 !A!N!*!Y! !20001103!20061031!052819732!052819732!001216845!n!itt Industries, Inc , Systems !4410 E Fountain Blvd !colorado Sprin !co!80916!16000!041!08!colorado Springs !EL Paso !colorado !+000016429445!n!n!000000000000!ac26!rdte/Missile and Space Systems-Mgmt Support !A2 !missile and Space Systems !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!B! !A !Y!R!2!003!B! !A!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $1.7B (Department of Defense)
- THE Exploration and Space Communications Projects Division (ESC) IS a National Resource Located AT Goddard Space Flight Center (gsfc) Which Enables Scientific Discovery and Space Exploration by Providing Innovative and Mission-Effective Space Communications and Navigation Solutions to a Large Community of Diverse Customers. ESC Manages Operational Geostationary Communications Relay Satellites and Ground Systems for the Space Communications and Navigation (scan) Program AT Nasa Headquarters. Today, Scan Network Systems Consist of the Space Network (SN), the Near Earth Network (NEN), and the Deep Space Network (DSN). the Day-To-Day Management of These Three Networks IS Currently NOT Fully Consistent. IT IS the Intention of the Government to Unify the SN and NEN Where Practicable Under This Contract Using Integrated, Common Management Practices and Network Solutions — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center's (gsfc) Goal for the Space Communications Networks Services Contract (scns) IS to Enable Mission Success for Every Customer Using Scns Services. KEY Objectives of the Scns Contract ARE to Decrease Cost and Maintain or Improve Operational Efficiency and Reliability, While Maintaining an Acceptable Level of Risk and Providing for Safe Operation of the Missions. the Contractor Shall Implement a Safety, Health, and Mission Assurance Program That Provides a Safe and Healthy Work Environment, Minimizes Program Risk, and Maximizes Nasa Mission Success. the Contractor Shall BE Responsible and Accountable for Achieving the Required Results. Core Requirement Functions, Such AS Configuration Management, Quality Assurance, ETC. ARE Required to Support Idiq Task Orders. the Space Network (SN) IS Comprised of a Fleet of On-Orbit Tracking and Data Relay Satellites (tdrs) and Associated Ground Systems That Provide Telecommunications Services. the Nature of the SN Architecture, I.E., Extremely Large Capital Investment, Contractor Operated Facilities, Continuous 24X7 Requirements, ETC., Lends Itself to a Core Requirements Approach. the Ground Network (GN) Consists of an Orbital Tracking Network and the Satellite Laser Ranging Network. the Nature of the Ground Network Architecture, I.E., Diverse MIX of Commercial and Government Assets, Evolving Geographic and Technical Customer Requirements, and Legacy Systems, ETC. Lends Itself to an Idiq Approach. Other Activities, I.E., Very Long Baseline Interferometry Network Operations and Maintenance (O&M), Electronic System Test Laboratory, Requirements Development, Hardware and Software Development, ETC. ARE Best Suited to an Idiq Approach in the Resource-Constrained Environment That Nasa Operates in — $1.2B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Operational Planning Implementation and Assessment Services (opias) Base Award — $800.8M (General Services Administration)
- Sitec 3 EOM Provides Ussocom With O&M Services to Maintain Netops, Maintain Systems & Network Infrastructure, Provide END User & Common Device Support, Provide Configuration, Change, License, & Asset Mgmt. Conduct Training and Perform Imacs Services — $651.0M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)