DoD's DISA Spends $21.8M on Computer Services via Non-Competitive Contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,780,999 ($21.8M)
Contractor: Chickasaw Advisory Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-08-01
End Date: 2014-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,886 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: SERVICES - LABOR
Place of Performance
Location: FORT BELVOIR, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22060
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.8 million to CHICKASAW ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC for work described as: SERVICES - LABOR Key points: 1. Significant spending on 'Other Computer Related Services' ($21.8M) over 5 years. 2. Contract awarded to Chickasaw Advisory Services, LLC, with no indication of competition. 3. Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpayment and value for taxpayer money. 4. The IT sector is prone to rapid technological change, requiring continuous evaluation of service relevance.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to higher costs if not managed tightly. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the $21.8M represents fair market value for the services rendered.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, suggesting a limited or sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for a $21.8M contract means taxpayers may not have received the best possible price or value for these computer-related services.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the lack of competitive bidding. The long contract duration (5 years) could mean the services became outdated or less effective over time. Transparency in government contracting is crucial; non-competitive awards warrant closer scrutiny.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Long contract duration
- No small business participation
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded to a specific company, potentially indicating specialized expertise.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically 'Other Computer Related Services'. Spending benchmarks in this area vary widely based on the specific services, but significant non-competitive awards often signal potential inefficiencies.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract did not involve small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This represents a missed opportunity to support small business growth and potentially leverage specialized capabilities.
Oversight & Accountability
The non-competitive nature of this award suggests a potential gap in oversight regarding fair competition. Further review is needed to understand why this contract was not competed.
Related Government Programs
- Other Computer Related Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Information Systems Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for overpayment due to lack of competition.
- Risk of acquiring outdated technology or services over a long contract period.
- Limited transparency in the procurement process.
- No small business participation.
Tags
other-computer-related-services, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.8 million to CHICKASAW ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC. SERVICES - LABOR
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHICKASAW ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-08-01. End: 2014-09-30.
What specific computer-related services were provided under this contract, and how did their value align with the $21.8M cost?
The contract falls under NAICS code 541519 (Other Computer Related Services). Without detailed service descriptions and performance metrics, it's impossible to definitively assess the value received. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure means costs were reimbursed plus a fixed fee, making cost control and value assessment critical but difficult without further data.
What were the justifications for awarding this contract on a non-competitive basis, and were alternatives explored?
The data states 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', implying a justification was made, possibly under specific FAR exceptions (e.g., sole-source justification). However, the lack of detailed documentation makes it impossible to verify if this was the most appropriate path or if competitive alternatives were adequately considered and rejected.
How effective were Chickasaw Advisory Services' contributions to the Defense Information Systems Agency's mission over the contract's five-year period?
Effectiveness is not directly measurable from the provided data. While the contract was awarded and presumably services rendered, the lack of competition and the CPFF structure mean that performance incentives might have been less robust. Assessing effectiveness would require reviewing performance reports, mission impact, and user feedback.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: HC102809R2016
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chickasaw Nation
Address: 17 EXECUTIVE PARK DR S STE 500, ATLANTA, GA, 30329
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,780,999
Exercised Options: $21,780,999
Current Obligation: $21,780,999
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-08-01
Current End Date: 2014-09-30
Potential End Date: 2014-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-10-16
More Contracts from Chickasaw Advisory Services, LLC
- NEW; Title: Administrative, Technical, Professional, Information Management and Technology Support and Assistance to the Office of Science; PI: Gayland Osteen — $14.8M (Department of Energy)
View all Chickasaw Advisory Services, LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)