DoD's $16M custom programming contract awarded to MERLIN LABS INC for 652 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,955,778 ($16.0M)

Contractor: Merlin Labs Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-08-01

End Date: 2026-05-15

Contract Duration: 652 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: COST SHARING

Sector: IT

Official Description: PDR & CDR

Place of Performance

Location: BOSTON, SUFFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02111

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.0 million to MERLIN LABS INC for work described as: PDR & CDR Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and service type. 2. Limited competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced innovation. 3. Performance risk is moderate, typical for custom software development. 4. This contract supports specialized IT services for U.S. Special Operations Command. 5. The IT services sector is highly dynamic, requiring continuous adaptation.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of approximately $16 million over 652 days suggests a daily rate of roughly $24,472. Benchmarking this against similar custom computer programming services requires detailed analysis of scope and complexity. Without specific comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the pricing structure (COST SHARING) indicates a potential for cost efficiencies if managed effectively, but also introduces risk if not properly controlled.

Cost Per Unit: $24,472 per day (estimated)

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded under a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities or when urgency precludes a competitive process. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to explore alternative solutions and potentially secure more favorable pricing through a bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can lead to higher costs for taxpayers as the government does not benefit from the price discovery mechanisms inherent in a competitive bidding environment.

Public Impact

This contract directly benefits the U.S. Special Operations Command by providing essential custom computer programming services. The services delivered are critical for enhancing operational capabilities and technological support for special operations missions. The geographic impact is primarily within the operational theaters of U.S. Special Operations Command, with potential for global reach. Workforce implications include the need for highly skilled software developers and IT professionals, likely concentrated within MERLIN LABS INC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition may lead to suboptimal pricing.
  • Sole-source awards can reduce transparency in procurement.
  • Cost-sharing contracts require robust oversight to prevent cost overruns.

Positive Signals

  • MERLIN LABS INC is likely chosen for specialized expertise required by SOCOM.
  • The contract duration suggests a need for sustained, integrated support.
  • The award supports critical national security functions.

Sector Analysis

The Information Technology (IT) services sector is a vast and rapidly evolving market. Custom computer programming services, classified under NAICS code 541511, represent a significant segment focused on developing tailored software solutions. The total addressable market for such services within the federal government is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Defense being major consumers. This contract fits within the broader IT services procurement landscape, supporting specialized defense needs.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'ss': false and 'sb': false. The award to MERLIN LABS INC, a company not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data, suggests it is likely a larger entity. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses, which could represent a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Defense and U.S. Special Operations Command contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be tied to the delivery order terms and conditions, performance metrics, and the cost-sharing agreement. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense IT Services
  • Special Operations Command Technology Procurement
  • Custom Software Development Contracts
  • Sole-Source IT Acquisitions

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Potential for price inflation due to lack of competition
  • Cost-sharing model requires diligent oversight

Tags

it-services, custom-computer-programming, department-of-defense, u-s-special-operations-command, sole-source, delivery-order, cost-sharing, massachusetts, large-contract, software-development

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.0 million to MERLIN LABS INC. PDR & CDR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MERLIN LABS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-08-01. End: 2026-05-15.

What is MERLIN LABS INC's track record with the Department of Defense and U.S. Special Operations Command?

Information regarding MERLIN LABS INC's specific track record with the Department of Defense (DoD) and U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous engagements with these entities. Understanding their history of delivering similar custom computer programming services on time and within budget is crucial for evaluating the risk associated with this new award. Without this historical context, it is difficult to gauge their reliability and capability beyond the current contract's scope.

How does the estimated daily rate of $24,472 compare to market benchmarks for similar custom programming services?

The estimated daily rate of approximately $24,472 for custom computer programming services is a significant figure that warrants careful benchmarking. Market rates for senior software developers and custom programming can vary widely based on location, skill set, security clearance requirements, and complexity of the project. For highly specialized or classified work, rates can indeed be higher. However, without knowing the specific technical requirements, labor mix, and overhead associated with this contract, a direct comparison is challenging. A thorough analysis would involve comparing this rate against industry surveys, other government contracts for similar services (especially those competed openly), and prevailing commercial rates for comparable expertise.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for custom computer programming?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for custom computer programming include a lack of competitive pressure, which can lead to inflated pricing and reduced incentive for innovation. The government may not be exposed to the most cost-effective solutions or the latest technological advancements that might have emerged from a competitive bidding process. Furthermore, sole-source awards can sometimes indicate a lack of available qualified vendors or a failure in the government's acquisition planning. This can also raise concerns about transparency and fairness in the procurement process, potentially leading to perceptions of favoritism or inefficiency. Robust justification and oversight are critical to mitigate these risks.

How effective is the 'COST SHARING' pricing model in controlling costs for custom software development?

The 'COST SHARING' pricing model, also known as cost-plus-incentive-fee or similar variations, aims to incentivize both the contractor and the government to control costs. In this model, the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs, but the final profit is adjusted based on performance against cost targets. While it can encourage cost consciousness, its effectiveness heavily relies on the clarity of the contract's cost objectives, the accuracy of initial estimates, and the government's ability to effectively monitor and audit the contractor's expenses. If not managed diligently, cost-sharing contracts can still lead to cost overruns, especially in complex custom development where scope can be fluid. Strong government oversight and clear performance metrics are essential for success.

What is the historical spending trend for custom computer programming services by U.S. Special Operations Command?

Analyzing the historical spending trends for custom computer programming services by U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) would provide valuable context for this $16 million award. Understanding whether this contract represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in such services is important. Data on past contract values, durations, and the number of competitive versus sole-source awards in this category would reveal patterns. For instance, a trend of increasing sole-source awards might indicate growing reliance on specific vendors or potential challenges in competing these requirements. Conversely, a stable or decreasing trend might suggest effective program management or shifts in technological needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesCustom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SVCS.TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST SHARING (T)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 129 SOUTH ST, BOSTON, MA, 02111

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,653,189

Exercised Options: $22,653,189

Current Obligation: $15,955,778

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: H9240824D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-08-01

Current End Date: 2026-05-15

Potential End Date: 2026-05-15 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-16

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending