CACI INC - FEDERAL awarded $14.8M for Computer Systems Design Services by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,844,152 ($14.8M)

Contractor: CACI Inc - Federal

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2006-08-25

End Date: 2011-11-28

Contract Duration: 1,921 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.7K/day

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: THIS IS A LOGICAL FOLLOW ON TO TASK ORDER 11SLM0002N

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20398

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $14.8 million to CACI INC - FEDERAL for work described as: THIS IS A LOGICAL FOLLOW ON TO TASK ORDER 11SLM0002N Key points: 1. Contract awarded as a logical follow-on to a previous task order, suggesting continuity and established performance. 2. The firm fixed price contract type indicates a defined scope and budget, potentially limiting cost overruns. 3. Services are for Computer Systems Design, a critical area for federal IT infrastructure. 4. The contract duration of 1921 days (approx. 5.2 years) suggests a long-term need for these services. 5. Awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), a key agency for federal procurement. 6. The contract was awarded in the District of Columbia, indicating a potential focus on federal operations in the capital region.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $14.8 million over approximately 5.2 years averages to about $2.85 million annually. Without specific benchmarks for similar Computer Systems Design Services contracts from GSA or other agencies, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the firm fixed price structure provides some cost control. Further analysis would require comparison to industry standards for similar scope and complexity.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data does not specify the competition level for this contract. It is unclear if it was competed under full and open competition, a limited competition, or awarded as a sole-source. The number of bidders and the specific procurement vehicle used are not detailed. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the competition in driving favorable pricing and terms.

Taxpayer Impact: Without knowing the competition level, it's impossible to determine the specific impact on taxpayer dollars. A well-competed contract typically leads to better prices, while a sole-source award may result in higher costs.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring computer systems design and integration services benefit from this contract. The services delivered likely support the modernization and efficiency of federal IT infrastructure. The geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, potentially supporting federal operations in the capital. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for IT professionals and system designers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of transparency regarding competition level hinders assessment of best value for taxpayers.
The long contract duration could present risks if technology or requirements change significantly.
No specific performance metrics or quality assurance details are provided in the summary data.

Positive Signals

Awarded as a follow-on task order, indicating a potentially stable and predictable requirement.
Firm fixed price contract type offers budget certainty.
Contractor CACI INC - FEDERAL is a known entity in federal IT services, suggesting experience.

Sector Analysis

Computer Systems Design Services fall under the broader Information Technology (IT) sector. This contract likely supports the design, development, and integration of complex IT systems for federal agencies. The market for these services is highly competitive, with numerous large and small businesses vying for federal contracts. Benchmarking would involve comparing pricing and scope to similar IT services contracts awarded by GSA and other civilian agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, CACI INC - FEDERAL, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on their own subcontracting plans and the nature of the services required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the General Services Administration. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is limited by the available data; further details on performance reviews or audits would be needed for a comprehensive assessment. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

IT Professional Services
Computer Systems Integration
Federal IT Modernization
GSA Schedule Contracts
IT Services for Civilian Agencies

Risk Flags

Competition Level Unknown
Long Contract Duration
Lack of Performance Metrics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $14.8 million to CACI INC - FEDERAL. THIS IS A LOGICAL FOLLOW ON TO TASK ORDER 11SLM0002N

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI INC - FEDERAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-08-25. End: 2011-11-28.

What is CACI INC - FEDERAL's track record with the General Services Administration?

CACI INC - FEDERAL has a significant history of contracting with the General Services Administration (GSA) across various IT and professional services. The provided data indicates this specific contract is a logical follow-on to a previous task order, suggesting a sustained relationship and potentially satisfactory performance on prior work. GSA, as a major procurer of IT services, relies on contractors like CACI for a wide range of needs. A deeper dive into CACI's contract history with GSA, including past performance evaluations, contract modifications, and any disputes or terminations, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record. This includes examining their performance on similar Computer Systems Design Services contracts to gauge their reliability and expertise within this specific domain.

How does the $14.8 million value compare to similar Computer Systems Design Services contracts?

The $14.8 million contract value for Computer Systems Design Services, spanning approximately 5.2 years, translates to an average annual value of roughly $2.85 million. To benchmark this effectively, comparisons should be made with other firm fixed price contracts for similar IT system design services awarded by the General Services Administration or other federal agencies. Factors such as the specific scope of work, complexity of the systems designed, geographic location, and the number of bidders would influence comparability. Without access to a database of comparable contract values and detailed scopes, a precise comparison is challenging. However, this value appears to be within a moderate range for long-term, specialized IT services supporting federal operations.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

Several risks are associated with this contract. Firstly, the long duration (1921 days) increases the risk of technological obsolescence or shifts in federal requirements, potentially making the designed systems outdated or misaligned with future needs. Secondly, the lack of detailed information on the competition level raises concerns about whether the government secured the best possible price and value. If the contract was not competitively bid, there's a risk of paying a premium. Thirdly, the absence of specific performance metrics or quality assurance details in the summary data makes it difficult to proactively monitor contractor performance and ensure the delivered systems meet stringent federal standards. Finally, reliance on a single contractor for a follow-on task order, even if competitively sourced initially, can create vendor lock-in.

How effective is the firm fixed price (FFP) contract type in managing costs for IT services?

The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in managing costs for IT services when the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. Under an FFP contract, the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns, providing the government with budget certainty. This structure incentivizes the contractor to manage their costs efficiently to maximize profit. For Computer Systems Design Services, where requirements can sometimes evolve, the FFP structure is most effective if detailed specifications and performance requirements are established upfront. If scope creep occurs, it can lead to costly change orders or disputes. Therefore, while FFP offers cost control, its effectiveness is highly dependent on the clarity and stability of the contract's statement of work.

What is the historical spending pattern for Computer Systems Design Services by GSA?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a significant spender on IT professional services, including Computer Systems Design Services, reflecting the federal government's continuous need to modernize and maintain its technological infrastructure. Historical spending patterns indicate a consistent demand for these services, often procured through GSA's Multiple Award Schedules (MAS) and other contract vehicles. GSA's spending in this area typically supports a wide range of agency requirements, from developing new software systems to integrating complex hardware and network solutions. Analyzing GSA's overall IT spending trends, particularly within the 541512 NAICS code (Computer Systems Design Services), would reveal fluctuations based on federal IT priorities, budget appropriations, and major modernization initiatives. This specific contract, being a follow-on, suggests a sustained spending pattern for this particular requirement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 1100 N. GLEBE RD, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,844,152

Exercised Options: $14,844,152

Current Obligation: $14,844,152

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07T00BGD0058

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline