GSA's $14.5M contract for STAR application maintenance and development awarded to Delta Corporate Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,464,096 ($14.5M)

Contractor: Delta Corporate Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2006-10-24

End Date: 2008-10-24

Contract Duration: 731 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.8K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FOR THE STAR APPLICATION (SYSTEM FOR TRACKING AND ADMINISTERING REAL-PROPERTY) FOR PBS CIO.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20405

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $14.5 million to DELTA CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. for work described as: MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FOR THE STAR APPLICATION (SYSTEM FOR TRACKING AND ADMINISTERING REAL-PROPERTY) FOR PBS CIO. Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in IT system maintenance and development. 2. The contract was awarded via a competitive delivery order, suggesting a degree of market vetting. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs, but requires careful scope management. 4. The duration of the contract (2 years) is typical for system maintenance and development projects. 5. The system's purpose (tracking and administering real property) indicates its importance for asset management. 6. Geographic location in DC may imply a focus on federal real estate assets within the capital region.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $14.5 million over two years for IT system maintenance and development appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar GSA IT contracts for system administration and development suggests this falls within a typical range for a specialized application. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, assuming the scope of work is well-defined and managed effectively to prevent costly change orders.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely had an opportunity to bid. The use of a competitive process is a positive sign for price discovery and ensures that the government is likely receiving a fair market price. The specific details of the competition, such as the number of bidders, are not provided, but the 'full-and-open' designation suggests a robust competitive environment.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering price competition among vendors.

Public Impact

Federal agencies utilizing the STAR application will benefit from continued system support and potential enhancements. The contract supports the maintenance and development of a critical system for managing federal real property. The primary geographic impact is likely within the District of Columbia, where the contract is registered. The contract supports IT professionals and developers involved in maintaining and enhancing the STAR application.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
  • Reliance on a single contractor for critical system maintenance could pose a risk if performance falters.
  • Ensuring ongoing alignment with evolving federal real property management needs requires proactive engagement.

Positive Signals

  • Competitive award process likely secured favorable pricing.
  • Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
  • System maintenance ensures continuity of essential government operations.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically focusing on software maintenance and development. The market for IT services supporting government operations is substantial, with agencies constantly seeking to modernize and maintain their critical systems. This contract for the STAR application is likely part of a broader GSA strategy to manage its extensive real property portfolio efficiently. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar enterprise-level IT system support contracts can vary widely based on complexity and user base.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Delta Corporate Services, Inc., is likely a larger entity. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this contract are dependent on the prime contractor's subcontracting strategy, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS). Mechanisms likely include regular performance reviews, contract management by contracting officers, and adherence to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) guidelines. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General oversight may be invoked if performance issues or potential fraud are identified.

Related Government Programs

  • Federal Real Property Management Systems
  • Government IT Infrastructure Support
  • Asset Management Software Contracts
  • GSA IT Modernization Initiatives

Risk Flags

  • Potential for vendor lock-in
  • Risk of performance degradation over contract term
  • Dependency on contractor's key personnel

Tags

it-services, software-maintenance, software-development, general-services-administration, gsa, federal-acquisition-service, fas, district-of-columbia, competitive-delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, real-property-management, asset-management

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $14.5 million to DELTA CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.. MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FOR THE STAR APPLICATION (SYSTEM FOR TRACKING AND ADMINISTERING REAL-PROPERTY) FOR PBS CIO.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DELTA CORPORATE SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-10-24. End: 2008-10-24.

What is the track record of Delta Corporate Services, Inc. in performing similar federal IT maintenance and development contracts?

Delta Corporate Services, Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts, primarily in IT services and support. While specific details on their performance for the STAR application are not detailed in this summary, their award suggests they met the qualifications required for this competitive delivery order. A deeper dive into their contract history, including past performance evaluations and any reported issues on similar projects, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability. Reviewing their performance on other GSA or agency contracts for system development and maintenance would be crucial for assessing their track record.

How does the $14.5 million contract value compare to the total federal spending on real property management IT systems?

The $14.5 million contract value for the STAR application represents a specific investment within the broader federal spending on IT systems for real property management. Federal agencies collectively spend billions annually on IT infrastructure, software, and services. While this contract is significant for the STAR application itself, it is a fraction of the total federal IT budget. To contextualize it further, one would need to analyze the total spending across all agencies on similar asset and property management systems, as well as the complexity and user base of the STAR application compared to others.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of the STAR application maintenance and development?

Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. However, typical KPIs for such IT maintenance and development contracts often include system uptime and availability, response times for issue resolution, successful deployment of new features or updates, user satisfaction ratings, and adherence to project timelines and budgets. The contracting officer and the agency program manager would establish and monitor these KPIs to ensure Delta Corporate Services, Inc. is meeting the performance requirements outlined in the contract statement of work.

What is the historical spending trend for the STAR application or similar real property management systems within GSA?

The provided data only details this specific $14.5 million contract awarded in 2006. To understand historical spending trends for the STAR application or similar systems within GSA, one would need to access historical contract data over multiple years. This would involve analyzing previous contracts for the STAR application (if any existed prior to this award) and comparing spending on other GSA real property management IT solutions. Such an analysis would reveal whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and identify any significant shifts in investment priorities.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single vendor for the maintenance and development of a critical system like STAR?

Relying on a single vendor, even one selected through a competitive process, carries inherent risks. These include vendor lock-in, where transitioning to another provider becomes difficult and costly. Performance degradation is another risk; if the vendor's capabilities decline or they face internal challenges, the system's functionality could suffer. There's also the risk of knowledge loss if key personnel at the vendor leave. Furthermore, a sole vendor might have less incentive to innovate aggressively compared to a market with more active competition. Mitigating these risks often involves robust contract management, clear performance expectations, and contingency planning.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 129 LITTLETON RD, PARSIPPANY, NJ, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,196,848

Exercised Options: $14,464,096

Current Obligation: $14,464,096

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0319M

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-10-24

Current End Date: 2008-10-24

Potential End Date: 2008-10-24 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-03-01

More Contracts from Delta Corporate Services, Inc.

View all Delta Corporate Services, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending