GSA's $10.6M Engineering Support Contract Awarded to Engility Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,610,787 ($10.6M)

Contractor: Engility Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-03-01

End Date: 2009-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,674 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: ANDOVER, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01810

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $10.6 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC for work described as: ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract provides engineering and technical support services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract duration spans over 4 years. 4. Services were procured using a Time and Materials pricing structure. 5. The contract was awarded to a single vendor. 6. This contract falls under the Federal Acquisition Service. 7. The contract was awarded in 2005 and expired in 2009.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.6 million over approximately 4.5 years suggests a moderate annual spend for engineering and technical support. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the use of Time and Materials pricing can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. Benchmarking against similar GSA contracts for engineering support would provide a clearer picture of whether the pricing was competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The data shows two bids were received. While full and open competition is generally preferred for maximizing competition and achieving best value, a low number of bids (two) might suggest potential limitations in the market for these specific services or challenges in the solicitation process.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even with a limited number of bidders, is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages vendors to offer competitive pricing and terms to secure the award.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring engineering and technical support services benefit from this contract. The contract supports the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service. Services likely contributed to various government projects and initiatives. The contract supported a workforce involved in engineering and technical disciplines.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost escalation due to Time and Materials pricing structure if not rigorously monitored.
Limited competition with only two bids received could indicate market concentration or barriers to entry.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, ensuring a broad initial outreach.
Contract provided essential engineering and technical support to federal agencies.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of specialized expertise. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, utilizing them for everything from IT support and engineering design to research and development. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms ranging from large corporations to small businesses offering specialized capabilities. This contract represents a portion of the government's overall spending on technical expertise to support its operations and missions.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (sb: false). There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not detailed, though larger prime contractors may engage small businesses for specialized support.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officers and program managers within the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance requirements outlined in the contract and the Time and Materials pricing structure, requiring diligent tracking of hours and costs against approved rates. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Acquisition Service Contracts
Engineering and Technical Support Services
Time and Materials Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition (2 bids)
Time and Materials pricing structure carries inherent cost risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $10.6 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC. ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-03-01. End: 2009-09-30.

What was the specific nature of the engineering and technical support provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT' services. However, the specific nature of these services is not detailed. Typically, such contracts can encompass a wide range of activities including systems engineering, design, analysis, testing, technical consulting, program management support, and lifecycle management for various government systems and projects. Without further documentation, the precise deliverables and technical areas supported remain unspecified. The General Services Administration (GSA) often uses such contracts to provide flexible support across multiple agencies and programs.

How did the pricing structure (Time and Materials) compare to other similar contracts awarded by GSA during that period?

The contract utilized a Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure. T&M contracts are often used when the scope of work is not clearly defined or is expected to evolve. While flexible, they carry a higher risk of cost overruns if not managed carefully. To assess its competitiveness, one would need to compare the labor rates and overhead factors billed by Engility Services, LLC against prevailing market rates and similar GSA contracts awarded around 2005-2009 for comparable engineering and technical support services. Benchmarking would involve analyzing the average hourly rates for different labor categories and the associated indirect cost rates to determine if the pricing was reasonable and offered good value for the government.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Engility Services, LLC's performance?

The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance metrics that were used to evaluate Engility Services, LLC. In Time and Materials contracts, performance is often assessed based on the timely completion of tasks, the quality of work delivered, adherence to technical specifications, and effective management of resources. Contracting officers and technical monitors would typically track progress against milestones, review deliverables, and manage the overall relationship to ensure satisfactory performance. Formal performance reports or ratings are usually part of the contract administration but are not detailed in this dataset.

What is the typical annual spending for engineering and technical support services by the GSA?

The total value of this contract was approximately $10.6 million over its 1674-day duration (roughly 4.5 years). This equates to an average annual spend of about $2.35 million for this specific contract. GSA's overall spending on engineering and technical support services can vary significantly year to year and across different programs and services offered by the agency. To establish a benchmark for typical annual spending, one would need to analyze GSA's historical procurement data across all its contracting vehicles and agencies for similar service categories over multiple fiscal years. This contract represents a single instance of such spending.

What is the track record of Engility Services, LLC in securing and performing on federal contracts, particularly for engineering support?

Engility Services, LLC (and its predecessors/successors) has historically been a significant contractor for the U.S. federal government, particularly in the areas of engineering, IT, and technical support. Prior to its acquisition by SAIC in 2019, Engility held numerous large contracts across various agencies, including the Department of Defense, intelligence community, and civilian agencies. Its track record generally involved providing complex technical solutions and support services. Performance on specific contracts would vary, and a detailed review would require examining individual contract performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports) and any associated contract disputes or awards.

How does the number of bids (2) on this 'full and open' contract compare to the average number of bids for similar GSA contracts?

The fact that this 'full and open' competition resulted in only two bids is noteworthy. For many federal contracts, especially those procured through broad categories like GSA's Federal Supply Schedule (FAS) or large IDIQs, the number of bids can range widely. However, for significant contract actions, receiving only two offers in a full and open competition might suggest several possibilities: the market for the specific niche services required was limited, the solicitation requirements were highly specialized, the contract value was not large enough to attract a wider range of bidders, or there were challenges in the outreach or proposal process. A comparative analysis against GSA's historical bid data for similar service types and contract values would be needed to determine if two bids is unusually low or within a typical range for this specific procurement context.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Address: 55 WALKERS BROOK DRIVE, READING, MA, 06

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $152,709,481

Exercised Options: $88,211,265

Current Obligation: $10,610,787

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS09K99BHD0008

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline