Army Aviation Logistics System Contracts Total $19.98M, Aiming to Boost Aircraft Availability and Efficiency

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,979,012 ($20.0M)

Contractor: Peraton Aerospace & Defense Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2006-03-16

End Date: 2009-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,294 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.4K/day

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: THE OBJECTIVE OF THE UNIT LEVEL LOGISTICS SYSTEM-AVIATION (ULLS-A) AND COMMON TRANSITION SYSTEM ARMY (CTS-A) PROGRAM (CTS-A) PROGRAMS ARE TO INCREASE AIRCRAFT AVAILABILITY AND IMPROVE OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY BY PROVIDING AN INFORMATION SYSTEM TO SUPPORT THE U.S. ARMY S HIGH OPERATIONAL TEMPO AND DIVERSE DEPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD DURING PEACETIME AND WARTIME ENGAGEMENTS.

Place of Performance

Location: FORT EUSTIS, NEWPORT NEWS CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23604

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $20.0 million to PERATON AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INC. for work described as: THE OBJECTIVE OF THE UNIT LEVEL LOGISTICS SYSTEM-AVIATION (ULLS-A) AND COMMON TRANSITION SYSTEM ARMY (CTS-A) PROGRAM (CTS-A) PROGRAMS ARE TO INCREASE AIRCRAFT AVAILABILITY AND IMPROVE OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY BY PROVIDING AN INFORMATION SYSTEM TO SUPPORT THE U.S. ARMY S HIGH OPER… Key points: 1. The ULLS-A and CTS-A programs aim to enhance aircraft availability and operational efficiency through an advanced information system. 2. Peraton Aerospace & Defense Inc. is the contractor for these critical Army logistics systems. 3. The contract, valued at $19.98 million, spans from March 2006 to September 2009. 4. This spending falls under Computer Systems Design Services, a key area for modern defense operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's Time and Materials pricing structure, while flexible, can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. Benchmarking against similar IT system development contracts is difficult without more granular cost data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract type is listed as a Delivery Order, but the specific competition method used to award it is not detailed. The lack of transparency regarding competition makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized to improve military readiness and operational capabilities through enhanced logistics information systems.

Public Impact

Improved aircraft readiness directly impacts the Army's ability to deploy and sustain operations globally. Enhanced operational efficiency can lead to reduced maintenance costs and faster response times in critical situations. The system supports the Army's high operational tempo, ensuring vital information is available during both peacetime and wartime. Investment in such systems contributes to the modernization of military logistics and information management.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
Lack of clarity on competition method for award.
Limited insight into specific performance metrics and achieved efficiencies.

Positive Signals

Addresses critical need for improved aircraft availability.
Supports high operational tempo and diverse deployment requirements.
Aims to increase overall operational efficiency for the Army.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on computer systems design for defense logistics. Spending benchmarks for similar large-scale defense IT systems vary widely, but this $19.98 million contract appears moderate for a multi-year program supporting critical operational needs.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific set-asides or participation goals for small businesses in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service likely provided oversight for this contract. However, details on specific oversight mechanisms, performance reviews, or accountability measures are not present in the provided data.

Related Government Programs

Computer Systems Design Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to T&M pricing.
Lack of transparency regarding competition.
Limited data on performance metrics and achieved outcomes.
No clear indication of small business participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $20.0 million to PERATON AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INC.. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE UNIT LEVEL LOGISTICS SYSTEM-AVIATION (ULLS-A) AND COMMON TRANSITION SYSTEM ARMY (CTS-A) PROGRAM (CTS-A) PROGRAMS ARE TO INCREASE AIRCRAFT AVAILABILITY AND IMPROVE OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY BY PROVIDING AN INFORMATION SYSTEM TO SUPPORT THE U.S. ARMY S HIGH OPERATIONAL TEMPO AND DIVERSE DEPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD DURING PEACETIME AND WARTIME ENGAGEMENTS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PERATON AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-16. End: 2009-09-30.

What specific metrics were used to define and measure 'increased aircraft availability' and 'improved operational efficiency' under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact metrics used to define or measure improvements in aircraft availability and operational efficiency. Typically, such metrics could include reduced downtime, faster turnaround times for maintenance, improved parts tracking, and enhanced data accuracy for flight scheduling and readiness reporting. Without detailed contract documentation or performance reports, a precise answer is not possible.

How did the Time and Materials pricing structure impact the final cost compared to a fixed-price contract for similar IT development?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts offer flexibility but can lead to higher costs if scope creep or inefficiencies occur, as the government pays for actual labor and materials. A fixed-price contract would have provided greater cost certainty upfront, but potentially less flexibility to adapt to evolving requirements. The final cost impact of T&M versus fixed-price is contingent on the contractor's efficiency and the program's requirement stability throughout its duration.

What was the competitive landscape for this contract, and did it result in optimal price discovery for the government?

The provided data does not specify the competitive process used for this delivery order. If it was awarded under a broad agency announcement or a competitive IDIQ, it might have involved multiple bidders. However, without details on the number of proposals received and the evaluation criteria, it's difficult to definitively assess the extent of competition and its impact on price discovery. A sole-source or limited competition scenario could potentially lead to less favorable pricing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Qinetiq Group PLC

Address: 4 RESEARCH PK DR, SAINT CHARLES, MO, 63304

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,344,839

Exercised Options: $19,979,012

Current Obligation: $19,979,012

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0120K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline