GSA awards $20.5M for engineering and IT support to Engility Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,511,750 ($20.5M)

Contractor: Engility Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-10-06

End Date: 2008-03-31

Contract Duration: 907 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.6K/day

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE HOMELAND SECURITY EXPERTISE IN ENGINEERING; ANALYSIS; EXERCISE PLANNING AND CONTROL; TRAINING; AND PROGRAM, MISSION, AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT.

Place of Performance

Location: PANAMA CITY, BAY County, FLORIDA, 32403, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $20.5 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE HOMELAND SECURITY EXPERTISE IN ENGINEERING; ANALYSIS; EXERCISE PLANNING AND CONTROL; TRAINING; AND PROGRAM, MISSION, AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT. Key points: 1. Contract provides broad support including engineering, analysis, exercise planning, training, and IT. 2. The contract was awarded as Other Direct Cost (ODC) which can sometimes lead to less predictable spending. 3. The contract duration of approximately 2.5 years is relatively short for the scope of services. 4. The contract was awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), a common civilian agency. 5. The contract's primary focus is on engineering and IT support services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $20.5 million over roughly 2.5 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, it's difficult to benchmark value for money. The 'Other Direct Cost' (ODC) award type means the government pays for actual costs incurred by the contractor plus a fee, which can be less predictable than fixed-price contracts. Comparing this to similar broad engineering and IT support contracts would be necessary for a more precise value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data does not specify the competition level for this contract. Understanding whether it was competed full and open, limited, or sole-source is crucial for assessing price discovery and potential value. If it was a limited competition, the number of bidders would be important. A full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly impacts taxpayer value. More competition typically drives down prices, ensuring taxpayer dollars are used more efficiently. Limited or sole-source awards may result in higher costs if not carefully managed.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely agencies requiring homeland security expertise in engineering, analysis, and IT support. Services delivered include critical functions such as exercise planning, training, and program management. The contract's geographic impact is noted as Florida (FL), suggesting a concentration of services or personnel in that state. Workforce implications could involve skilled engineers, analysts, and IT professionals supporting homeland security missions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'Other Direct Cost' (ODC) award type can lead to less predictable spending compared to fixed-price contracts.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and value of the services provided.
The contract's broad scope could lead to potential scope creep if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

The contract addresses critical homeland security needs, indicating strategic importance.
The award to Engility Services, LLC suggests a contractor with existing capabilities in the required domains.
The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), which has established procurement processes.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), which is a significant part of the federal contracting landscape. The total federal spending on engineering services is substantial, encompassing a wide range of activities from design and consulting to specialized analysis and support. This particular contract appears to focus on the application of engineering principles to homeland security, including program support and IT integration, rather than traditional infrastructure design. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other contracts for similar support services to federal agencies, particularly those focused on national security or public safety.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, Engility Services, LLC, would be responsible for its own subcontracting plan if applicable, but this contract does not mandate small business participation through a set-aside.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA), which awarded the contract. GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) is responsible for managing a wide range of government-wide acquisition contracts and services. Accountability measures would be defined within the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency would depend on GSA's public reporting practices for this specific contract, including contract modifications and performance data. Inspector General jurisdiction would typically apply if there were allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Homeland Security Contracts
Engineering Services
IT Support Services
Program Management Support
Exercise Planning Contracts

Risk Flags

ODC Award Type
Broad Scope of Services
Lack of Specific Performance Metrics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $20.5 million to ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE HOMELAND SECURITY EXPERTISE IN ENGINEERING; ANALYSIS; EXERCISE PLANNING AND CONTROL; TRAINING; AND PROGRAM, MISSION, AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENGILITY SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-06. End: 2008-03-31.

What is the track record of Engility Services, LLC in delivering similar homeland security support services?

Engility Services, LLC, has a history of providing a wide range of services to the federal government, including IT, engineering, and mission support. While specific details on their performance for this particular contract are not provided, their broader portfolio suggests experience in complex government programs. To assess their track record for this specific type of homeland security support, one would need to examine past performance evaluations, contract awards, and any publicly available CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) reports. A review of their historical contract data, including any awards or terminations for default, would also be informative. Without this granular data, it's challenging to definitively state their specific success rate in delivering these precise services.

How does the $20.5 million contract value compare to similar engineering and IT support contracts for homeland security?

The $20.5 million contract value, awarded over approximately 2.5 years (907 days), translates to an average annual value of roughly $8.2 million. This figure is moderate within the context of federal IT and engineering support services, especially for large-scale programs. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare this to contracts with similar scopes of work (engineering, analysis, exercise planning, IT support) awarded to other contractors by agencies focused on national security or homeland security. Factors like contract duration, specific deliverables, and the level of technical expertise required would influence comparability. Contracts for broader system integration or large-scale infrastructure projects would likely be significantly higher, while smaller, more specialized support contracts might be lower.

What are the key risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential scope creep due to the broad nature of the services (engineering, analysis, exercise planning, IT support), the 'Other Direct Cost' (ODC) award type which can lead to less predictable spending and potential cost overruns if not managed diligently, and the possibility of performance issues if the contractor lacks the specific expertise required for homeland security applications. Mitigation strategies would involve robust contract management by the GSA, including clear definition of tasks, regular performance reviews, and strict oversight of expenditures under the ODC structure. The government would need to ensure detailed statements of work and performance metrics are in place. Contractor selection based on demonstrated past performance in similar environments is also a critical risk mitigation factor.

How effective is the General Services Administration (GSA) in managing contracts of this nature?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a primary agency for managing government-wide acquisition contracts and providing shared services, including IT and professional services. GSA has extensive experience in contract administration and oversight. Their effectiveness in managing contracts like this one for homeland security support hinges on several factors: the clarity of the contract's objectives and deliverables, the adequacy of the contract's funding, the diligence of the contracting officers and program managers in overseeing performance and costs, and the contractor's own performance. GSA utilizes various tools and processes for contract oversight, including performance monitoring and financial management. However, the effectiveness can vary depending on the specific contract and the resources allocated to its management.

What are the historical spending patterns for engineering and IT support services within the Department of Homeland Security or similar agencies?

Historical spending patterns for engineering and IT support services within agencies like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are generally substantial and growing, reflecting the increasing reliance on technology and specialized expertise for national security and public safety missions. DHS, in particular, procures a vast array of services, including cybersecurity, data analytics, infrastructure engineering, and mission-critical IT systems support. Spending in these categories often fluctuates based on evolving threats, technological advancements, and specific program requirements. Benchmarking this $20.5 million contract against the overall spending of DHS or other security-focused agencies would place it as a moderate-sized award, likely supporting a specific program or set of functions rather than a broad agency-wide initiative.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Contractor Details

Address: 100 BRICKSTONE SQUARE, ANDOVER, MA, 01810

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,511,750

Exercised Options: $20,511,750

Current Obligation: $20,511,750

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F0008K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline