Air Force Advisory Services Contract Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton for $21.8M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,822,785 ($21.8M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2013-08-22

End Date: 2017-02-21

Contract Duration: 1,279 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: SECRETARY OF AIR FORCE ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES IGF::CL::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: MC LEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22101

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $21.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: SECRETARY OF AIR FORCE ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES IGF::CL::IGF Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single large business, Booz Allen Hamilton. 2. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting. 3. The contract duration was 1279 days. 4. This award represents a portion of broader federal consulting spend.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $21.8M over approximately 3.5 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar large-scale consulting contracts is difficult without more granular data on service scope and deliverables.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The $21.8M spent on advisory services represents taxpayer funds allocated for management consulting support to the Air Force.

Public Impact

Supports Air Force strategic planning and administrative functions. Consulting services can influence policy and operational efficiency. Potential for knowledge transfer and capacity building within the Air Force.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics.
Potential for scope creep in advisory services.
Reliance on a single large contractor.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Services support critical Air Force functions.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management consulting. Federal spending on these services is substantial, supporting various agency operations and strategic initiatives.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to a large business (Booz Allen Hamilton) and there is no indication of small business participation in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Air Force to ensure deliverables meet requirements and funds are used appropriately.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Contract duration is lengthy.
No small business participation noted.
Lack of specific service details.
Potential for cost overruns with Time and Materials contract type.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $21.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. SECRETARY OF AIR FORCE ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES IGF::CL::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-08-22. End: 2017-02-21.

What specific advisory and assistance services were provided under this contract?

The contract description is broad, encompassing 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' Specific details on the nature of the advisory services, such as strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, or policy development, are not provided in the data. Understanding the precise services is crucial for assessing value and effectiveness.

How did the competitive bidding process ensure the best value for the government?

While awarded under full and open competition, the data does not detail the number of bids received or the evaluation criteria used. Assessing the effectiveness of the competition requires examining the bid landscape and the government's evaluation process to confirm that the chosen contractor offered the best combination of technical merit and price.

What was the impact of this contract on the Air Force's operational effectiveness?

The provided data does not include performance metrics or outcomes related to the advisory services. To determine the impact on operational effectiveness, one would need to review post-contract assessments, program reviews, or qualitative feedback on how the consulting services contributed to Air Force goals and efficiency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID02120066

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,877,758

Exercised Options: $28,877,758

Current Obligation: $21,822,785

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $881,034

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F9755H

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline