GSA awards $73.5M contract for program management and system development support to URS Federal Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $73,507,112 ($73.5M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2010-12-23

End Date: 2016-06-22

Contract Duration: 2,008 days

Daily Burn Rate: $36.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, ACQUISITION, AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, MONTGOMERY County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $73.5 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, ACQUISITION, AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value of $73.5M over approximately 5.5 years. 2. Competition was full and open, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks. 4. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Time and Materials contract type, while flexible, offers less price certainty compared to fixed-price contracts. Benchmarking against similar consulting services is difficult without detailed task order data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust process for selecting the contractor. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is positive for taxpayer value. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure requires diligent oversight to manage costs effectively.

Public Impact

Supports critical government functions in program management and system development. Ensures access to specialized consulting expertise for federal agencies. The contract duration spans multiple fiscal years, providing continuity of services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials pricing can lead to cost overruns if not managed closely.
Lack of specific task order details makes granular cost analysis challenging.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition ensures a broad range of potential bidders.
Contract supports essential government operational needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management consulting. Spending in this area is common across federal agencies for specialized expertise not available internally.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the prime contractor is URS Federal Services, Inc. There is no explicit information on small business subcontracting participation within this data snippet.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for awarding and overseeing this contract. Diligent oversight of the Time and Materials contract is crucial to ensure cost efficiency and prevent scope creep.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data.
Limited insight into specific deliverables and their impact.
No explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals or achievements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $73.5 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, ACQUISITION, AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $73.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-12-23. End: 2016-06-22.

What was the average hourly rate or total cost per task order under this contract, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks for similar consulting services?

Without access to individual task order details, it's impossible to determine the average hourly rate or total cost per task. Benchmarking would require comparing specific deliverables and labor categories against market data for administrative management and general management consulting services, which is not provided here.

What specific program management and system development activities were supported by this contract, and what was the measurable impact on agency efficiency or mission accomplishment?

The provided data lacks specifics on the exact programs or systems supported. To assess impact, one would need to review task order descriptions and performance reports to identify key achievements, improvements in operational efficiency, or successful system implementations directly attributable to the contractor's services.

How effectively did the GSA manage the Time and Materials aspect of this contract to ensure fair pricing and prevent potential cost overruns?

Effective management of a Time and Materials contract hinges on robust oversight, including detailed review of labor hours, rates, and direct costs. Success would be indicated by the contract staying within its ceiling, timely delivery of services, and GSA's ability to negotiate favorable rates and control scope creep through vigilant monitoring.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 02R257100215

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)

Address: 20501 SENECA MEADOWS PKWY STE 300, GERMANTOWN, MD, 20876

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $83,506,968

Exercised Options: $73,581,024

Current Obligation: $73,507,112

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0202K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline