GSA Awards $22.6M for Electronic Processing and Storage Solution to CACI Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,631,333 ($22.6M)

Contractor: CACI Inc - Federal

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2007-08-30

End Date: 2012-08-29

Contract Duration: 1,826 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.4K/day

Competition Type: NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND STORAGE SOLUTION FOR SEC

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22310

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $22.6 million to CACI INC - FEDERAL for work described as: ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND STORAGE SOLUTION FOR SEC Key points: 1. Contract awarded to CACI INC - FEDERAL for $22.6M. 2. Service category is Computer Systems Design Services (NAICS 541512). 3. Contract type is Non-Competitive Delivery Order. 4. Duration of the contract is 1826 days. 5. Awarded by General Services Administration, Federal Acquisition Service.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract is a Cost Plus Award Fee type, which can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. The total award value is $22.6M over approximately 5 years. Without specific performance metrics or benchmarks, assessing value is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This was a non-competitive delivery order, indicating limited competition. This method may not result in the best possible price discovery for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about potential overspending and reduced value for taxpayer dollars.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may not have received the best value due to the non-competitive nature of the award. The use of a Cost Plus Award Fee contract requires diligent oversight to ensure performance and cost control. The duration of the contract (5 years) suggests a significant, ongoing need for these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Non-competitive award
Cost Plus Award Fee contract type
Lack of clear performance benchmarks for value assessment

Positive Signals

Award to an established federal contractor (CACI)
Clear service category (Computer Systems Design)

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under IT services, specifically computer systems design. Spending in this sector can vary widely, but non-competitive awards for IT solutions warrant scrutiny to ensure cost-effectiveness and alignment with technological advancements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the award went to CACI INC - FEDERAL, a large business. There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), Federal Acquisition Service. Oversight would be crucial given the non-competitive nature and the Cost Plus Award Fee structure to ensure accountability and prevent cost overruns.

Related Government Programs

Computer Systems Design Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Non-competitive award limits price competition.
Cost Plus Award Fee structure can incentivize higher costs.
Potential for outdated technology given the award date.
Lack of transparency regarding justification for non-competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $22.6 million to CACI INC - FEDERAL. ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND STORAGE SOLUTION FOR SEC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI INC - FEDERAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-08-30. End: 2012-08-29.

What specific electronic processing and storage capabilities were procured, and how do they align with current government needs and technological standards?

The data does not specify the exact capabilities procured beyond 'ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND STORAGE SOLUTION'. A detailed review of the contract's statement of work would be necessary to understand the specific technologies and services. Given the award date (2007), it's possible the procured solution may be outdated, impacting its effectiveness and value compared to contemporary offerings.

What was the justification for a non-competitive award, and were alternative solutions or vendors considered?

The justification for a non-competitive award is not provided in the data. Typically, such awards are made under specific circumstances like urgent needs, sole-source availability of technology, or prior contract vehicles. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the government explored all viable options to ensure fair pricing and competition.

How was the performance of CACI INC - FEDERAL evaluated under the Cost Plus Award Fee structure to ensure optimal value for the government?

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure implies performance metrics were established and evaluated. However, the provided data does not detail these metrics or the resulting award fees. Effective oversight by the GSA would have been critical to ensure CACI met or exceeded performance expectations, thereby justifying the 'award' portion of the fee.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 1100 N. GLEBE RD, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $47,602,915

Exercised Options: $22,631,333

Current Obligation: $22,631,333

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07T00BGD0021

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline