CACI INC - FEDERAL awarded $11.37M for ADP Systems Analysis Services by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,369,013 ($11.4M)

Contractor: CACI Inc - Federal

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-06-15

End Date: 2010-10-30

Contract Duration: 1,963 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.8K/day

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: ADP SYSTEMS ANALYSIS SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, WILCOX County, ALABAMA, 36722

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $11.4 million to CACI INC - FEDERAL for work described as: ADP SYSTEMS ANALYSIS SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded for ADP Systems Analysis Services, indicating a need for IT consulting and system design. 2. The contract was awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), a key agency for federal IT procurement. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can carry higher risk if costs are not well-managed. 4. The duration of the contract was 1963 days, suggesting a long-term need for these services. 5. The award was made under the Federal Acquisition Service, which supports various government agencies. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541512 points to Computer Systems Design Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure requires careful monitoring to ensure value for money, as it allows for cost reimbursement plus a fixed fee. Without detailed cost breakdowns and performance metrics, it's challenging to benchmark against similar contracts. The total value of $11.37 million over approximately five years suggests a moderate investment in IT analysis services. Further analysis would require access to the contractor's cost proposals and performance reports to assess if the fixed fee was commensurate with the services rendered and if the overall cost was competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition level for this contract is not specified in the provided data. If it was competed, the number of bidders and the nature of the solicitation (e.g., full and open, limited) would significantly impact price discovery. A competitive process generally leads to better pricing for the government. If it was sole-source or a limited competition, the government may have paid a premium.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly impacts taxpayer value. Robust competition typically drives down prices, ensuring that taxpayer funds are used more efficiently. Limited competition can result in higher costs.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring analysis of their Automated Data Processing (ADP) systems benefit from improved efficiency and effectiveness. The services delivered likely involve IT strategy, system design, and potentially modernization efforts. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting federal agencies across the United States. The contract supports the federal IT workforce by engaging specialized analytical and design expertise.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can incentivize contractors to incur costs, requiring strong government oversight to manage expenses.
Lack of detailed competition data makes it difficult to assess if the government achieved the best possible price.
The long contract duration could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.

Positive Signals

Award to CACI INC - FEDERAL suggests a contractor with established capabilities in IT services.
Award by GSA indicates adherence to established procurement processes.
The contract addresses a critical government need for ADP systems analysis.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT consulting and computer systems design sector, a significant area of federal spending. The market for these services is large and competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. Federal agencies rely heavily on such services for managing complex IT infrastructures, ensuring cybersecurity, and driving digital transformation. Benchmarking this contract's value would involve comparing its total value and duration against similar IT analysis and design contracts awarded by federal agencies over the same period.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting goals. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem. Federal contracts of this size often have provisions for small business participation, but this specific award's details are unknown.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the contracting officers and program managers within the General Services Administration (GSA). The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitates rigorous oversight of incurred costs and the contractor's performance against the fixed fee. Transparency would depend on GSA's reporting practices and the availability of contract performance data. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

IT Consulting Services
Computer Systems Design
ADP Modernization
Federal IT Procurement
GSA Schedules

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires diligent oversight to manage costs.
Competition level is unknown, potentially impacting price discovery and value.
Long contract duration could pose risks if requirements evolve significantly.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $11.4 million to CACI INC - FEDERAL. ADP SYSTEMS ANALYSIS SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI INC - FEDERAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-06-15. End: 2010-10-30.

What is CACI INC - FEDERAL's track record with government contracts, particularly for IT analysis services?

CACI INC - FEDERAL is a well-established government contractor with a significant history of awards across various federal agencies. They specialize in a wide range of IT services, including systems integration, cybersecurity, and data analytics, which align with the scope of ADP Systems Analysis Services. Their track record generally indicates experience in managing large-scale IT projects. However, a detailed review of past performance evaluations, past performance information (PPI) databases, and any contract disputes or terminations would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their specific performance on similar contracts. This would help determine their reliability and effectiveness in delivering complex IT analysis solutions.

How does the $11.37 million value compare to similar ADP systems analysis contracts?

The $11.37 million contract value awarded to CACI INC - FEDERAL for ADP Systems Analysis Services over approximately five years (1963 days) represents a moderate investment. To benchmark this value, one would need to compare it against other contracts for similar IT analysis, system design, and consulting services awarded by agencies like GSA, DOD, or civilian departments during the same period. Factors such as contract duration, scope of work complexity, specific deliverables, and the level of competition would influence comparability. Without access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state whether this represents excellent, fair, or concerning value. However, for a five-year engagement, this figure suggests a sustained need for specialized IT expertise.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for IT services?

The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, like the one awarded to CACI INC - FEDERAL, is that the government may overpay if costs are not rigorously controlled and scrutinized. While the fixed fee provides the contractor with a predictable profit margin, the 'cost plus' portion means the government reimburses allowable costs. This structure can incentivize contractors to incur higher costs than necessary, as their fee remains constant. Effective risk mitigation requires robust government oversight, detailed cost accounting, regular audits, and clear performance metrics to ensure that costs are reasonable, allocable, and necessary for the services rendered. Without strong oversight, the CPFF structure can lead to cost overruns and reduced value for taxpayer money.

What is the typical duration for ADP systems analysis contracts, and how does this contract's duration compare?

The duration of ADP systems analysis contracts can vary significantly based on the scope and complexity of the required services. Contracts for strategic analysis or system design might range from a few months to several years. This contract's duration of 1963 days (approximately 5.4 years) is on the longer side, suggesting a long-term, ongoing need for these analytical services rather than a discrete, short-term project. Longer durations can offer stability for both the agency and the contractor but also increase the risk of technological obsolescence or changes in agency requirements. Comparing this duration to similar long-term IT support or analysis contracts would provide context on whether it is standard, unusually long, or short for the services procured.

How does the GSA Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) typically manage IT service contracts like this one?

The GSA Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) manages IT service contracts by leveraging various acquisition vehicles, including GSA Schedules, Government-Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs), and direct procurements. For a contract like this, FAS likely utilized existing contract vehicles or conducted a specific solicitation. Their management typically involves establishing clear performance work statements (PWS), defining key performance indicators (KPIs), and conducting regular performance reviews. FAS aims to ensure fair and competitive pricing, compliance with federal acquisition regulations, and timely delivery of services. Oversight mechanisms include contract administration, payment approvals, and dispute resolution processes, all designed to maximize value and minimize risk for the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 1100 N. GLEBE RD, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,866,832

Exercised Options: $11,866,832

Current Obligation: $11,369,013

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07T00BGD0058

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline