GSA awards $13.3M contract for Army architectural structure support to Enterprise Integration, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,343,334 ($13.3M)

Contractor: Enterprise Integration, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-02-23

End Date: 2010-02-22

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.3K/day

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR PEO AND THE DALEI IN DEVELOPING AND MANAGING THE ARMY'S ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE.

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22030

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $13.3 million to ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION, INC. for work described as: TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR PEO AND THE DALEI IN DEVELOPING AND MANAGING THE ARMY'S ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE. Key points: 1. Contract value of $13.3 million over five years indicates a significant investment in technical support. 2. The award to Enterprise Integration, Inc. suggests a focus on specialized expertise in architectural structure development. 3. The 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code points to a broad range of potential IT and technical services. 4. A Time and Materials contract type can pose cost control risks if not closely managed. 5. The contract duration of 1825 days (5 years) allows for long-term project development and support. 6. The award was made under the Federal Acquisition Service, indicating a centralized procurement approach. 7. The contract's purpose is to support PEO and DALEI in managing the Army's architectural structure.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $13.3 million over five years averages to approximately $2.66 million per year. Without specific benchmarks for 'PEO and DALEI architectural structure development and management,' it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, while flexible, can lead to higher costs if not managed diligently compared to fixed-price contracts. Benchmarking against similar technical support services for large-scale defense architectural projects would be necessary for a more precise value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data does not specify the competition level for this contract. The absence of details regarding the solicitation process, number of bidders, or whether it was a sole-source award makes it impossible to assess the dynamics of competition. Understanding the procurement method is crucial for determining if the government received the best possible pricing and solutions through a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly impacts taxpayer value. Limited or no competition can lead to higher prices and potentially less innovative solutions, while robust competition generally drives down costs and encourages better performance.

Public Impact

The U.S. Army benefits from enhanced development and management of its architectural structure. The PEO (Program Executive Office) and DALEI (Defense Acquisition Logistics and Technology Enterprise Systems and Services) are key beneficiaries, receiving critical technical support. The services delivered are focused on the foundational IT and architectural frameworks supporting Army operations. The geographic impact is primarily within the Army's operational and developmental spheres, likely supporting various defense installations and personnel. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized technical and architectural expertise within the Army and its supporting contractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
Lack of transparency on competition level makes it difficult to assess price reasonableness.
The broad NAICS code 'Other Computer Related Services' could encompass a wide range of services, potentially leading to scope creep if not well-defined.

Positive Signals

Long contract duration (5 years) allows for sustained support and development of complex architectural structures.
Award to a specific contractor suggests a potential alignment of expertise with the Army's needs.
Procurement through GSA's Federal Acquisition Service indicates adherence to established government procurement processes.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader Information Technology and Professional Services sector, specifically focusing on computer-related services. The market for such services supporting defense agencies is substantial, driven by the continuous need for modernization and robust architectural frameworks. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other large-scale IT support and systems integration contracts awarded to defense entities, often measured in millions of dollars annually.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, Enterprise Integration, Inc., presumably a larger entity, received the award. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. Without set-asides or specific subcontracting goals, the direct benefit to small businesses from this particular contract appears limited.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA) as the contracting agency and the U.S. Army as the end-user. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is often facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Army IT Modernization Programs
Defense Enterprise Architecture Services
PEO Support Contracts
GSA IT Schedule Contracts
Technical Consulting Services for Federal Agencies

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Lack of transparency regarding the competitive bidding process.
Broad NAICS code may lead to undefined scope or scope creep.
Need for robust oversight to ensure value for money.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $13.3 million to ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION, INC.. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR PEO AND THE DALEI IN DEVELOPING AND MANAGING THE ARMY'S ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-02-23. End: 2010-02-22.

What is the specific nature of the 'architectural structure' being developed and managed for the Army?

The 'architectural structure' likely refers to the enterprise architecture (EA) of the Army's systems and processes. Enterprise architecture provides a strategic blueprint that defines the current and future state of an organization's business processes, information systems, and technology infrastructure. For the Army, this would encompass how various IT systems, data flows, and operational capabilities are integrated and managed to support its mission. Developing and managing this structure involves defining standards, policies, and roadmaps to ensure interoperability, security, efficiency, and alignment with strategic objectives. The technical support services provided by Enterprise Integration, Inc. would be crucial in analyzing existing architectures, designing future states, and overseeing the implementation of changes across the vast Army enterprise.

How does the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type compare to other contract types in terms of cost efficiency for this type of service?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts are flexible and suitable for projects where the scope of work is not clearly defined at the outset or is expected to evolve. They reimburse the contractor for the actual cost of labor (at specified hourly rates) and materials, plus a fixed fee or profit. While offering flexibility, T&M contracts carry a higher risk of cost overruns for the government compared to fixed-price contracts, as the final cost is not predetermined. For services like architectural structure development, where requirements might change, T&M can be appropriate. However, effective government oversight, including labor hour limitations and detailed monitoring of expenditures, is critical to ensure cost efficiency and prevent uncontrolled spending. Fixed-price contracts, conversely, offer greater cost certainty but may be less adaptable to evolving technical requirements.

What is Enterprise Integration, Inc.'s track record with similar large-scale defense IT support contracts?

Enterprise Integration, Inc. (EII) has a history of providing IT services and solutions to government agencies, including defense clients. While specific details on their track record for 'PEO and DALEI architectural structure development and management' are not detailed in this summary, EII has experience in areas such as systems engineering, software development, and IT support. Their past performance on contracts with agencies like the Department of Defense (DoD) would be a key factor in their selection for this award. A thorough review of their past performance evaluations, including any past performance questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS reports, would provide a clearer picture of their capabilities, reliability, and success in delivering complex IT solutions within the defense sector.

What are the potential risks associated with the 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code in terms of service delivery?

The NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' is a broad category that encompasses a wide array of IT services not specifically classified under other codes. This breadth can introduce risks related to scope definition and service delivery. For instance, it could include services ranging from IT consulting and disaster recovery to software installation and hardware troubleshooting. If the contract's statement of work (SOW) is not meticulously detailed and clearly delineates the specific services required for the Army's architectural structure, there is a risk of scope creep, where the contractor may be asked to perform services beyond the original intent, potentially leading to cost increases and delivery delays. Clear communication, robust project management, and precise SOWs are essential to mitigate these risks.

How does this $13.3 million contract compare to overall GSA spending on IT support services?

The $13.3 million awarded to Enterprise Integration, Inc. represents a specific investment within the broader landscape of GSA's IT support services spending. GSA manages a vast array of IT contracts through various vehicles, including IT Schedule 70 (now IT Professional Services), which facilitates the procurement of a wide range of IT services. Total GSA spending on IT services annually runs into billions of dollars, supporting numerous agencies across the federal government. This particular contract, while significant for the specific project it supports, is a fraction of GSA's overall IT procurement portfolio. Benchmarking this contract's value against similar, large-scale enterprise architecture or technical support contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies would provide better context for its relative size and significance within the federal IT services market.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Contractor Details

Address: 11350 RANDOM HILLS RD, FAIRFAX, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $39,406,449

Exercised Options: $39,406,449

Current Obligation: $13,343,334

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0557L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline