GSA awards $10.3M for Engineering Services to Summit Technologies, Inc. over 5 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,297,692 ($10.3M)

Contractor: Summit Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2004-10-21

End Date: 2009-09-15

Contract Duration: 1,790 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.8K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WINTER PARK, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32789

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $10.3 million to SUMMIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract Value: $10.3 million over 5 years. 2. Contractor: Summit Technologies, Inc. 3. Agency: General Services Administration (GSA). 4. Service Type: Engineering Services (NAICS 541330).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.3 million over 5 years for engineering services appears reasonable given the duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar GSA contracts for engineering services would provide a clearer assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

This was a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely had an opportunity to bid. The competitive nature should have driven price discovery and ensured a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently, with pricing determined through market forces.

Public Impact

Supports critical engineering functions for the GSA. Provides employment opportunities within the engineering sector. Ensures access to specialized technical expertise for government projects.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep over the 5-year period.
Reliance on a single contractor for specialized services.

Positive Signals

Competitive award process.
Long-term engagement allows for continuity.

Sector Analysis

Engineering services are crucial for government infrastructure and technical projects. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs and project complexity. GSA's role is to facilitate efficient procurement for various federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard GSA oversight mechanisms should be in place to ensure performance and accountability.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Contract duration of 5 years may lead to price escalation.
Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $10.3 million to SUMMIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SUMMIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-10-21. End: 2009-09-15.

What specific engineering services are covered under this contract?

The contract falls under NAICS code 541330 for Engineering Services. This typically includes services such as civil, mechanical, electrical, and environmental engineering, as well as design, consulting, and project management for various government projects.

What were the key performance metrics and evaluation criteria used in this competitive award?

While the award was competitive, specific performance metrics and evaluation criteria are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such criteria would include technical approach, past performance, management capability, and price, to ensure the best value was selected.

How does the awarded price compare to industry benchmarks for similar engineering services?

Without specific details on the services rendered and the labor categories involved, a direct comparison to industry benchmarks is difficult. However, the $10.3 million over 5 years suggests an average annual spend of approximately $2.06 million, which needs to be evaluated against the complexity and criticality of the engineering tasks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 360 S PENNSYLVANIA AVE, WINTER PARK, FL, 10

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,674,147

Exercised Options: $10,297,692

Current Obligation: $10,297,692

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F0097K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline