GSA Awards $51.4M for Integrated Award Environment Common Services to Booz Allen Hamilton

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $51,356,088 ($51.4M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2015-09-08

End Date: 2020-03-07

Contract Duration: 1,642 days

Daily Burn Rate: $31.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: INTEGRATED AWARD ENVIRONMENT COMMON SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF FOR OTHER FUNCTIONS

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20405

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $51.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: INTEGRATED AWARD ENVIRONMENT COMMON SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF FOR OTHER FUNCTIONS Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single large business, Booz Allen Hamilton. 2. The contract falls under Computer Systems Design Services (NAICS 541512). 3. Full and open competition was utilized for this award. 4. The contract duration is over 4.5 years, indicating a significant investment.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which can lead to higher costs if not managed effectively. Benchmarking against similar contracts for IT services is difficult without more granular cost data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires careful monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for IT services supporting federal acquisition. The effectiveness of the competition and contract management will determine the ultimate value for taxpayers.

Public Impact

Supports the Federal Acquisition Service's mission. Impacts the efficiency of federal contract awards. Provides essential IT infrastructure for government procurement.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Award Fee structure may incentivize higher costs.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
Long contract duration could lead to vendor lock-in.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Supports critical federal acquisition functions.
Experienced contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically computer systems design. Spending benchmarks for similar large-scale IT service contracts can vary widely based on scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to a large business and did not include any small business set-aside provisions. This indicates no direct benefit to small businesses through this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for oversight. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure necessitates strong oversight to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

Computer Systems Design Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
Long contract duration may limit future flexibility.
Lack of small business participation.
Limited transparency on performance metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $51.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. INTEGRATED AWARD ENVIRONMENT COMMON SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF FOR OTHER FUNCTIONS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $51.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-09-08. End: 2020-03-07.

What specific performance metrics are in place to ensure the 'award fee' component drives desired outcomes and value for money?

The provided data does not detail the specific performance metrics tied to the award fee. A Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract typically includes objective and subjective criteria. Effective oversight would involve rigorous tracking of these metrics to ensure the contractor meets or exceeds performance expectations, thereby justifying the award fee and maximizing value for the government.

How does the government ensure cost reasonableness and prevent potential cost overruns with a CPAF contract structure over its multi-year duration?

Preventing cost overruns in a CPAF contract requires robust government oversight, including regular audits, detailed cost analysis, and active negotiation. The government must closely monitor incurred costs against the base fee and establish clear criteria for the award fee. Proactive engagement with the contractor to identify and mitigate risks early is crucial to maintaining cost control throughout the contract's lifecycle.

What is the long-term strategy for the Integrated Award Environment, and how does this contract contribute to its evolution and potential future consolidation or competition?

This contract appears to support the ongoing operational needs of the Integrated Award Environment (IAE). The long-term strategy would likely involve continuous improvement, potential modernization, and adaptation to evolving federal acquisition requirements. Future competition or consolidation would depend on the IAE's strategic roadmap, technological advancements, and the government's assessment of market capabilities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID15150002

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $253,958,754

Exercised Options: $193,469,322

Current Obligation: $51,356,088

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q09BGD0019

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline