Northrop Grumman Awarded $45M for MCEN Network Defense Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $45,036,798 ($45.0M)
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2016-06-03
End Date: 2019-06-02
Contract Duration: 1,094 days
Daily Burn Rate: $41.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO SUPPORT MCNOSC IN CARRYING OUT THE TECHNICAL SUBSET OF THE DOCTRINAL DOD CNDSP FUNCTIONS OF PROTECTION DETECTION AND RESPONSE IN ORDER TO DISRUPT DENY AND DEGRADE NETWORK ADVERSARIES ABILITY TO INFLUENCE THE CONFIDENTIALITY INTEGRITY AVAILABILITY AUTHENTICATION AND NON-REPUDIATION OF IT SERVICES PROVIDED TO USERS ON THE MCEN AND JOINT NETWORKS.
Place of Performance
Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $45.0 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO SUPPORT MCNOSC IN CARRYING OUT THE TECHNICAL SUBSET OF THE DOCTRINAL DOD CNDSP FUNCTIONS OF PROTECTION DETECTION AND RESPONSE IN ORDER TO DISRUPT DENY AND DEGRADE NETWORK ADVERSARIES ABILITY TO INFLUENCE THE CONFIDENTIALIT… Key points: 1. Contract supports critical Department of Defense (DoD) Cyber Network Defense (CND) functions. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk is moderate, given the complexity of cyber defense and reliance on a single vendor for this task order. 4. Sector is Information Technology, specifically Computer Systems Design Services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), which can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Benchmarking against similar DoD cyber defense contracts is difficult without more granular cost data.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. However, the specific task order award to Northrop Grumman suggests a competitive process for this particular requirement.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used to enhance national cybersecurity infrastructure, which is a critical public good. The effectiveness of spending will depend on the successful execution of the CND functions.
Public Impact
Enhances national cybersecurity for military networks (MCEN and Joint Networks). Supports protection, detection, and response against cyber adversaries. Aims to disrupt adversaries' ability to compromise IT services. Contributes to the overall security and readiness of military operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- CPFF contract type can incentivize cost overruns.
- Reliance on a single vendor for this specific task order.
- Complexity of cyber defense operations requires robust oversight.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Supports critical national security functions.
- Clear objectives for network defense.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining secure and operational government networks, especially within defense contexts. Benchmarks for similar cyber defense contracts are highly variable due to unique requirements and threat landscapes.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, small businesses were likely not primary awardees, though they may participate as subcontractors to Northrop Grumman.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is likely managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service and the requiring agency (MCNOSC). Robust oversight is essential for CPFF contracts to ensure cost control and performance effectiveness.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Federal Acquisition Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost overruns potential with CPFF.
- Vendor lock-in for critical cyber defense.
- Complexity of cyber threats requires continuous adaptation.
- Dependence on contractor's personnel expertise.
- Potential for scope creep in evolving cyber landscape.
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, general-services-administration, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $45.0 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. IGF::OT::IGF THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO SUPPORT MCNOSC IN CARRYING OUT THE TECHNICAL SUBSET OF THE DOCTRINAL DOD CNDSP FUNCTIONS OF PROTECTION DETECTION AND RESPONSE IN ORDER TO DISRUPT DENY AND DEGRADE NETWORK ADVERSARIES ABILITY TO INFLUENCE THE CONFIDENTIALITY INTEGRITY AVAILABILITY AUTHENTICATION AND NON-REPUDIATION OF IT SERVICES PROVIDED TO USERS ON THE MCEN AND JOINT NETWORKS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $45.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-06-03. End: 2019-06-02.
What is the specific performance metric used to evaluate the success of the protection, detection, and response functions?
The provided data does not specify the performance metrics for the CND functions. Effective oversight would require clearly defined metrics such as mean time to detect (MTTD), mean time to respond (MTTR), number of successful threat mitigations, and reduction in successful cyber intrusions. These metrics are crucial for assessing the value and effectiveness of the contract.
How is the fixed fee determined in this Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, and what mechanisms are in place to prevent contractor inefficiency from increasing costs?
The fixed fee in a CPFF contract is negotiated at the outset and represents the contractor's profit. While the government pays actual allowable costs plus the fixed fee, mechanisms to prevent inefficiency include performance incentives, audits, and strict oversight of expenditures. The government's ability to manage scope and monitor performance is key to controlling costs.
What is the process for transitioning these critical cyber defense capabilities if a future contract is awarded to a different vendor?
Transitioning critical cyber defense capabilities requires meticulous planning to ensure continuity of operations and security. This typically involves phased handovers, knowledge transfer sessions, and joint testing. The contract likely includes clauses for transition assistance, and the government would manage the process to minimize disruption and security gaps.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation (UEI: 967356127)
Address: 7575 COLSHIRE DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $47,775,869
Exercised Options: $47,775,869
Current Obligation: $45,036,798
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 327
Total Subaward Amount: $210,554,856
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00Q09BGD0056
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-06-03
Current End Date: 2019-06-02
Potential End Date: 2019-06-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-03-03
More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
- 200506!000026!5700!fa8214!oo-Alc/Pkme/Lmke !F4261098C0001 !A!N! !Y! !p01502!20041213!20050701!001563738!004179453!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Space & Missi!888 S 2000 E !clearfield !ut!84015!13850!011!49!clearfield !davis !utah !-000001960000!n!n!000000000000!l014!tech REP Svcs/Guided Missiles !A2 !missile and Space Systems !302 !minuteman III GRP !541330!E! !3! ! !C! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!l!2!002!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $10.0B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-7) — $8.5B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-2) — $5.4B (Department of Defense)
- First DDT and E, Ares I-X, and Flight Tests. First Stage Will BE a Five Segment, Solid Rocket Booster Derived From the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) Solid Rocket Booster (srb)/Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (rsrm). the Contractor Shall Furnish the Necessary Management, Engineering, Labor, Facilities, Tools, Equipment, and Materials Required for First Stage Development, Qualification, Certification and Acceptance Program. Activities Include: Redesign and Testing of the Motor to Incorporate the Fifth Segment and Production of Five Full Scale Ground Static Test Motors: TWO Development Motors (dms)-And Three Qualification Motors (QMS); Structural Test Article (STA), Ground Vibration Test Motors (gvtms) and Other Development Testing; Redesign of the Avionics, Deceleration, Separation, and Flight Termination System (FTS) Subsystems; Ares I-X: Simulated Ares I Outer Mold Line/Mass Properties Using Modified Srb/Rsrm; and Three Flight Test Vehicles. TAS::80 0124::TAS — $4.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Federal Contract — $4.4B (Department of Defense)
View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)