DHS Consolidation Project: GSA awards $25M for Construction Management Support Services to AFG Group Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,950,265 ($25.0M)

Contractor: AFG Group Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2015-03-31

End Date: 2021-02-28

Contract Duration: 2,161 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES - PHASE II DHS CONSOLIDATION AT ST ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS, SE, WASHINGTON, DC: BASE YEAR SERVICES (BA51 PORTION ONLY)

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20032

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $25.0 million to AFG GROUP INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES - PHASE II DHS CONSOLIDATION AT ST ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS, SE, WASHINGTON, DC: BASE YEAR SERVICES (BA51 PORTION ONLY) Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Phase II of DHS Consolidation at St. Elizabeths West Campus. 2. AFG Group Inc. secured the base year services portion of the contract. 3. The contract is for Engineering Services (NAICS 541330). 4. This award represents a significant investment in federal infrastructure modernization.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $24.95M for a 2161-day duration appears reasonable for comprehensive construction management support services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale federal construction management contracts would provide further validation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to competitive pricing as multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from competitive pricing achieved through a full and open bidding process, ensuring value for money on this significant infrastructure project.

Public Impact

Enhances security and operational efficiency for the Department of Homeland Security. Contributes to the revitalization of the historic St. Elizabeths campus. Supports job creation in the construction management and engineering sectors. Represents a long-term commitment to federal facility modernization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for scope creep in long-term construction projects.
  • Reliance on a single contractor for critical support services.
  • Schedule delays inherent in large-scale construction.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Clear definition of services for base year.
  • Long-term contract duration allows for consistent support.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting large-scale federal construction and infrastructure projects. Spending in this area is often driven by modernization efforts and national security requirements.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to AFG Group Inc. and does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses in this particular award action. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) managed this award, indicating established oversight processes. The Public Buildings Service (PBS) within GSA is responsible for managing federal real estate, including projects like this.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • General Services Administration Contracting
  • Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration (2161 days) increases risk of cost escalation.
  • Potential for schedule delays common in large construction projects.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for critical support.
  • Scope creep could lead to budget overruns.
  • Limited visibility into specific performance metrics from provided data.

Tags

engineering-services, general-services-administration, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $25.0 million to AFG GROUP INC.. IGF::OT::IGF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES - PHASE II DHS CONSOLIDATION AT ST ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS, SE, WASHINGTON, DC: BASE YEAR SERVICES (BA51 PORTION ONLY)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AFG GROUP INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-03-31. End: 2021-02-28.

What is the projected total cost of the entire DHS Consolidation project, and how does this $25M contract fit into the overall budget?

The provided data only details the base year services for construction management support. The total cost for the entire DHS Consolidation project is not specified here. This $25M award represents a portion of the overall project expenditure, likely covering initial planning, design oversight, and management for the base year of Phase II. A comprehensive understanding requires access to the full project budget and scope.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of AFG Group Inc.'s services under this contract?

Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for AFG Group Inc.'s services are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, for construction management support, KPIs would include adherence to schedule, budget management, quality control, safety compliance, and effective coordination among various project stakeholders. The contract documents themselves would outline these performance metrics and evaluation criteria.

How will the GSA ensure continued cost-effectiveness and value for money throughout the contract's duration, especially if options are exercised?

The GSA ensures cost-effectiveness through the initial full and open competition, which drives competitive pricing. For subsequent periods or option exercises, the GSA would likely rely on performance reviews, market research for comparable services, and potentially re-negotiation based on demonstrated performance and current market conditions. Robust contract administration and oversight are crucial for maintaining value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 950 HERNDON PKWY STE 200, HERNDON, VA, 20170

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,950,265

Exercised Options: $24,950,265

Current Obligation: $24,950,265

Actual Outlays: $93,966

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F0371P

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2015-03-31

Current End Date: 2021-02-28

Potential End Date: 2021-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-11-10

More Contracts from AFG Group Inc.

View all AFG Group Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending