GSA awards $10M+ in engineering and construction management services to Amentum Technology, Inc. over 10 years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $9,986,839 ($10.0M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2016-09-30
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 3,560 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF AWARD OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PES) AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (CMA).
Place of Performance
Location: NASHVILLE, DAVIDSON County, TENNESSEE, 37203
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $10.0 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF AWARD OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PES) AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (CMA). Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant long-term investment in infrastructure management. 2. The firm fixed-price structure aims to control costs and provide predictability. 3. A 10-year duration suggests a need for sustained, specialized support. 4. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified vendors. 5. The contract supports public buildings and infrastructure, impacting federal facilities nationwide. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 points to specialized engineering expertise.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's total value of over $9.98 million spread across a decade suggests a moderate annual spend, likely in the range of $1 million per year. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale engineering and construction management contracts awarded by GSA or other federal agencies would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally favorable for the government when scope is well-defined, as it shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. However, without detailed task orders and specific deliverables, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 4 bids (no) indicates a competitive environment, which typically leads to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The level of competition suggests that GSA sought a robust pool of qualified engineering and construction management firms, and the selection process likely involved a thorough evaluation of technical capabilities and price.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a market where contractors are incentivized to offer competitive pricing and high-quality services to win awards. This approach helps ensure that federal funds are used efficiently.
Public Impact
Federal agencies utilizing GSA-managed facilities benefit from improved infrastructure maintenance and development. The contract supports the modernization and upkeep of public buildings across the United States. Specialized engineering and construction management expertise is being leveraged to ensure project success. The duration of the contract implies a stable pipeline of work for the contractor and potential workforce stability.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long-term nature of the contract could lead to contractor over-reliance and potential complacency if not actively managed.
- Scope creep on large, multi-year engineering projects can lead to cost increases if not rigorously controlled.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a decade may limit opportunities for other firms to gain experience with GSA projects.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government over the contract term.
- Full and open competition ensures a wide selection of qualified vendors, promoting best value.
- The contract's duration allows for deep expertise development and long-term relationship building with the agency.
Sector Analysis
The engineering services sector (NAICS 541330) is a critical component of federal infrastructure development and maintenance. This contract falls within a broad category of professional, scientific, and technical services. Federal spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to manage, design, and oversee the construction and renovation of government facilities. The market is characterized by a mix of large, established firms and smaller specialized companies. GSA's role as a central procurement agency means contracts like this are indicative of broader federal real estate and infrastructure investment trends.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (sb: false, ss: false). While the prime contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., is a large entity, the contract terms may allow for subcontracting opportunities. Analysis of subcontracting plans would be necessary to determine the extent to which small businesses might benefit from this award, either directly or indirectly, by providing specialized services or materials.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Public Buildings Service. GSA typically employs contract officers, project managers, and quality assurance specialists to monitor performance, ensure compliance with contract terms, and approve payments. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by limiting the government's exposure to cost overruns. Transparency would be enhanced through regular reporting requirements and potentially through public access to contract modifications and performance reviews.
Related Government Programs
- GSA Federal Buildings Fund
- Public Buildings Service Contracts
- Engineering and Architectural Services
- Construction Management Services
- Federal Infrastructure Modernization Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of scope creep or unforeseen cost increases.
- Firm Fixed Price contracts can be problematic if initial scope is not well-defined for complex engineering projects.
- Potential for contractor over-reliance over the 10-year period.
Tags
engineering-services, construction-management, general-services-administration, public-buildings-service, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, professional-services, infrastructure, tennessee, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $10.0 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. IGF::CL::IGF AWARD OF THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES (PES) AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (CMA).
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-09-30. End: 2026-06-30.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with GSA and similar federal contracts?
Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant history of performing federal contracts, including those with the General Services Administration (GSA) and other agencies like the Department of Defense. Their portfolio often includes large-scale engineering, technical services, and facility management. Prior performance with GSA would be a key factor in their selection for this contract, likely involving evaluations of their ability to deliver on time, within budget, and to required quality standards. Reviewing past performance reports and any documented issues or commendations would provide insight into their reliability and expertise in managing complex federal projects.
How does the $10M+ award value compare to similar GSA engineering and construction management contracts?
The $10M+ award value for a 10-year contract for professional engineering and construction management services is substantial but not extraordinary for GSA's scale of operations. GSA manages a vast portfolio of federal buildings, and large-scale renovation, design, and management projects frequently exceed this value. For instance, major building modernizations or new construction oversight contracts can easily run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars over similar or shorter durations. This $10M+ award likely represents a significant, but not top-tier, investment in a specific set of facilities or a particular program requiring sustained expertise.
What are the primary risks associated with a 10-year firm fixed-price contract for engineering services?
The primary risks with a 10-year firm fixed-price (FFP) contract for engineering services revolve around scope definition and potential for unforeseen changes. While FFP shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor, if the initial scope is poorly defined or if significant unforeseen technical challenges arise (e.g., discovering hazardous materials, unexpected structural issues), the contractor may be unwilling or unable to absorb the additional costs. This could lead to disputes, delays, or a contractor seeking modifications. Conversely, if the scope is too narrowly defined, the government might not receive the full range of services needed. The long duration also increases the risk of technological obsolescence or changes in regulatory requirements that may not have been anticipated.
How effective is full and open competition in ensuring value for money for GSA engineering contracts?
Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for money in GSA engineering contracts. By allowing all qualified sources to compete, GSA can leverage market forces to drive down prices and encourage innovation. The presence of multiple bidders, as indicated by the 4 bids received in this case, suggests a healthy competitive environment. This process allows GSA to compare technical approaches and pricing from various firms, selecting the offer that provides the best overall value, not just the lowest price. However, the effectiveness is contingent on GSA's ability to clearly define requirements and evaluate proposals rigorously.
What is the historical spending trend for engineering and construction management services by GSA?
GSA's historical spending on engineering and construction management services has been consistently high, reflecting its mandate to manage and maintain the federal government's real property assets. Annual spending fluctuates based on infrastructure needs, budget allocations, and major project cycles. Over the past decade, GSA has increasingly focused on modernizing aging federal buildings, improving energy efficiency, and ensuring facility security, all of which require significant engineering and construction management support. Spending in this category typically represents a substantial portion of the GSA Federal Buildings Fund, indicating a sustained demand for these professional services.
What are the implications of the 'TENNESSEE' (TN) state designation for this contract?
The 'TENNESSEE' (TN) designation likely indicates the primary geographic location or area of operations for this specific contract award, or at least a significant portion of the work to be performed. This could mean that the engineering and construction management services are focused on federal facilities located within Tennessee, or that the contractor's regional office responsible for this work is based there. For taxpayers, this might imply a localized investment in infrastructure within that state. It could also influence the selection process if GSA prioritizes local or regional expertise, though the 'full and open competition' clause suggests the primary driver was capability and price, not necessarily geographic preference.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: GS-P-04-16-BV-7008
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 600 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $9,986,839
Exercised Options: $9,986,839
Current Obligation: $9,986,839
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 6
Total Subaward Amount: $499,695
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F038CA
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-09-30
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2026-08-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-30
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)