GSA awards $18.9M for 6-month CFM services at New Carrollton Federal Building

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,900,359 ($18.9M)

Contractor: Park Tower Metro View Management, L.P.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2008-02-29

End Date: 2011-09-28

Contract Duration: 1,307 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 6 MONTHS CFM SERVICES FOR NEW CARROLLTON FEDERAL BLD

Place of Performance

Location: LANHAM, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20706

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $18.9 million to PARK TOWER METRO VIEW MANAGEMENT, L.P. for work described as: 6 MONTHS CFM SERVICES FOR NEW CARROLLTON FEDERAL BLD Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Park Tower Metro View Management, L.P. for facilities support. 2. Services are for the New Carrollton Federal Building, located in Maryland. 3. The contract duration is 1307 days, significantly longer than the initial 6-month scope. 4. This contract was not competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures. 5. The base award amount is $18.9M, with a potential value of $14.4M.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The base award of $18.9M for 6 months of services seems high for facilities support. The potential value of $14.4M, which is less than the base award, is also unusual and warrants further investigation into the contract's structure and pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP,' indicating a limited competition approach. This method may not have resulted in the best possible price discovery for the government, potentially leading to higher costs.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of full and open competition and the unusual award structure suggest potential for suboptimal taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Federal employees working at the New Carrollton Federal Building will experience continuity of facilities services. Taxpayers may be overpaying for facilities management due to limited competition. The extended duration beyond the initial 6-month scope raises questions about planning and cost control.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Unusual award structure with base award exceeding potential value.
  • Limited competition method ('NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP').
  • Extended contract duration beyond initial scope.
  • No indication of small business participation.

Positive Signals

  • Services provided to a federal building, ensuring operational continuity.

Sector Analysis

Facilities support services, including building operations and maintenance, are crucial for government infrastructure. Benchmarks for such services vary widely based on building size, complexity, and location, but the pricing here appears high for the stated initial scope.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract involved small businesses, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to confirm if small business participation was sought or achieved.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation suggests a deviation from standard competitive procurement processes. Oversight is needed to ensure the justification for limited competition was sound and that the pricing is reasonable.

Related Government Programs

  • Facilities Support Services
  • General Services Administration Contracting
  • Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential overpricing due to limited competition.
  • Unusual contract award structure (base > potential).
  • Lack of transparency regarding competition justification.
  • Extended contract duration raises cost control concerns.
  • No apparent small business participation.

Tags

facilities-support-services, general-services-administration, md, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $18.9 million to PARK TOWER METRO VIEW MANAGEMENT, L.P.. 6 MONTHS CFM SERVICES FOR NEW CARROLLTON FEDERAL BLD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PARK TOWER METRO VIEW MANAGEMENT, L.P..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-02-29. End: 2011-09-28.

What is the justification for the unusual award structure where the base award significantly exceeds the potential value?

The provided data does not contain the justification for the unusual award structure. Typically, a base award represents the guaranteed amount, and the potential value includes options or contract line items that may or may not be exercised. The inverse relationship here suggests a potential error in data entry or a highly unconventional contract modification that requires further investigation.

What specific factors led to the decision to not compete this contract under SAP?

The data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP.' This implies that the procurement did not meet the criteria for simplified acquisition procedures, which are typically used for purchases below a certain dollar threshold. Reasons could include the complexity of the services, the need for specialized capabilities, or specific agency requirements that necessitated a different procurement approach.

How does the per-unit cost of these CFM services compare to similar contracts for federal buildings of comparable size and scope?

Without a detailed breakdown of the services provided and their associated costs, a direct per-unit cost comparison is not feasible. However, the overall award amount of $18.9M for an initial 6-month period appears high for standard facilities support services. A more granular analysis of the contract's PWS and pricing would be necessary to establish relevant benchmarks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 499 PARK AVE FL 27, NEW YORK, NY, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,900,359

Exercised Options: $18,900,359

Current Obligation: $18,900,359

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-02-29

Current End Date: 2011-09-28

Potential End Date: 2011-09-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-09-29

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending