GSA's $10.6M O&M Contract with ODOI Associates Faces Scrutiny Over Competition and Value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,585,345 ($10.6M)

Contractor: Odoi Associates, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2007-11-05

End Date: 2012-10-31

Contract Duration: 1,822 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20597

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $10.6 million to ODOI ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract awarded to ODOI Associates for Operation and Maintenance services represents a significant expenditure of $10.6 million. 2. Competition was limited, raising questions about potential price discovery and taxpayer value. 3. The contract's duration and fixed-price nature warrant a closer look at cost control and performance. 4. The sector involves essential building services, impacting public facilities and their operational efficiency.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the $10.6M price against similar O&M contracts is challenging without detailed service scope. The fixed-price structure suggests an expectation of predictable costs, but the lack of robust competition could mean the government did not secure the best possible pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a non-standard procurement method that likely limited the pool of potential bidders. This restricted competition may have hindered effective price discovery and potentially led to a higher price than could have been achieved through broader competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best value for the $10.6 million spent on these essential maintenance services.

Public Impact

Public buildings in Washington D.C. rely on these services for operational continuity. Taxpayer funds are allocated for maintaining critical infrastructure. The procurement process impacts the availability of contracts for other service providers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition
  • Potential for overpayment due to restricted bidding
  • Long contract duration (5 years)

Positive Signals

  • Contract awarded for essential services
  • Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically related to building operations and maintenance. Spending in this area is crucial for government facility upkeep, with benchmarks varying widely based on building size, complexity, and service level agreements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business, as the 'sb' field is false. This suggests that larger, established firms dominated the bidding process, potentially limiting opportunities for small businesses in this service area.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' clause warrants further review to ensure compliance with procurement regulations and to understand the justification for excluding certain sources. Oversight should focus on whether the chosen method truly served the government's best interest.

Related Government Programs

  • Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors
  • General Services Administration Contracting
  • Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Limited competition raises value concerns.
  • Procurement method requires justification.
  • Long contract duration may mask inefficiencies.
  • Lack of small business participation.

Tags

plumbing-heating-and-air-conditioning-co, general-services-administration, dc, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $10.6 million to ODOI ASSOCIATES, INC.. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ODOI ASSOCIATES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-11-05. End: 2012-10-31.

What was the specific justification for excluding sources in this 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' procurement, and did it result in a fair and reasonable price?

The justification for excluding sources is critical. Typically, such clauses are used when specific technical capabilities or security requirements necessitate a narrowed field. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the exclusion was warranted or if it unduly restricted competition, potentially inflating the $10.6M price and impacting overall value for taxpayers.

How does the $10.6M contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar Operation and Maintenance services in the Washington D.C. area, considering the contract's duration?

A comprehensive comparison requires detailed service scope, building specifics, and prevailing market rates in D.C. However, given the 5-year duration and the fixed-price nature, the $10.6M total cost implies an average annual expenditure. If this average significantly exceeds market rates for comparable services, it indicates potential overspending and reduced taxpayer value.

What performance metrics were established for this contract, and how effectively were they monitored to ensure service quality and accountability over its 5-year term?

Effective oversight of O&M contracts hinges on robust performance metrics and diligent monitoring. Understanding the key performance indicators (KPIs) used, the frequency of performance reviews, and any documented issues or successes is essential to gauge the contractor's effectiveness and ensure the $10.6M investment yielded the expected operational benefits for public facilities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionBuilding Equipment ContractorsPlumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: GS-11P-07-YT-D-0466

Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7911BELLE POINT DR, GREENBELT, MD, 04

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,757,130

Exercised Options: $10,585,345

Current Obligation: $10,585,345

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-11-05

Current End Date: 2012-10-31

Potential End Date: 2012-10-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-09-29

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending