GSA Awards $13.8M for Lafayette Building Design; DMJM Design/McClier Selected

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,816,354 ($13.8M)

Contractor: Dmjm Design/Mcclier, a Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2005-06-10

End Date: 2019-03-29

Contract Duration: 5,040 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF THE LAFAYETTE BUILDING, WASH., DC

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20407

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $13.8 million to DMJM DESIGN/MCCLIER, A JOINT VENTURE for work described as: PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF THE LAFAYETTE BUILDING, WASH., DC Key points: 1. Contract awarded for architectural services to modernize the Lafayette Building. 2. Full and open competition was utilized for this procurement. 3. The contract duration spans over 5000 days, indicating a long-term project. 4. The firm fixed price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $13.8M for architectural services appears reasonable for a large-scale building modernization project. Benchmarking against similar GSA projects would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Full and open competition was employed, allowing multiple firms to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for taxpayer value, as it encourages market forces to drive down costs.

Public Impact

Modernization of a significant federal building in Washington D.C. Potential for improved facility functionality and energy efficiency. Impact on local businesses and workforce during the design and subsequent construction phases.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (5040 days) may present risks of scope creep or outdated designs if not managed effectively.
Lack of specific small business participation noted.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed price contract provides cost predictability.
Full and open competition likely yielded competitive pricing.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under architectural services, a key component of the construction and professional services sector. Spending in this area is often tied to infrastructure upgrades and federal facility management.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside or requirement for this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for managing federal buildings. Oversight would involve ensuring the design meets federal standards and project milestones are met within budget.

Related Government Programs

Architectural Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may lead to design obsolescence.
No explicit mention of small business participation.
Potential for scope creep over an extended project timeline.
Lack of detailed cost breakdown for subsequent construction phases.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $13.8 million to DMJM DESIGN/MCCLIER, A JOINT VENTURE. PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF THE LAFAYETTE BUILDING, WASH., DC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DMJM DESIGN/MCCLIER, A JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-06-10. End: 2019-03-29.

What is the estimated cost of the subsequent construction phase, and how does the design cost compare as a percentage?

The provided data only covers the design services contract. The subsequent construction costs are not detailed here. Typically, design fees for major federal building modernizations can range from 5-15% of the total construction cost, depending on project complexity and scope. A detailed cost breakdown of the construction phase would be necessary for a comprehensive value assessment.

Are there any specific sustainability or energy efficiency goals mandated for the Lafayette Building modernization?

The contract details do not explicitly mention specific sustainability or energy efficiency goals. However, modern federal building projects often incorporate requirements for LEED certification or other green building standards. The architectural design services would likely include considerations for energy efficiency and environmental impact, aligning with federal mandates for sustainable facilities.

How will the long contract duration impact the relevance and cost-effectiveness of the final design?

A 5040-day (approximately 13.8 years) duration for design services is exceptionally long and raises concerns about design obsolescence and cost management. While the contract was awarded in 2005 and ended in 2019, the extended period suggests potential for significant changes in technology, building codes, or project requirements. Effective project management and phased design reviews would be crucial to mitigate risks associated with such a lengthy engagement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)

Address: 1525 WILSON BLVD, ARLINGTON, VA, 22209

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,816,354

Exercised Options: $13,816,354

Current Obligation: $13,816,354

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline